Comparison of anterior and posterior vertebral column resection versus anterior release with posterior internal distraction for severe and rigid scoliosis

被引:17
|
作者
Ren, Chunpeng [1 ]
Liu, Limin [1 ]
Song, Yueming [1 ]
Zhou, Chunguang [1 ]
Liu, Hao [1 ]
Li, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
关键词
Severe and rigid scoliosis; Vertebral column resection; Anterior release; Internal distraction; SEVERE SPINAL DEFORMITIES; HALO-GRAVITY TRACTION; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; OSTEOTOMY; EFFICACY; FUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-014-3270-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to compare efficacy, safety, and cost between staged vertebral column resection (VCR) and anterior release with internal distraction in treating severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis. We examined the records of 43 patients with severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis treated in our hospital. Group A included 26 patients who underwent anterior VCR followed by posterior vertebral column resection and instrumentation from July 2007 to October 2009. Group B included 17 patients who underwent anterior release with temporary posterior internal distraction, followed by posterior fusion and instrumentation from November 2009 to June 2011. The average preoperative main curve for group A was 101.3A degrees (range 90A degrees-130A degrees) and for group B was 104.8A degrees (range 90A degrees-136A degrees). Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. A t test demonstrated that the differences between the groups in preoperative and postoperative coronal and sagittal imbalance, thoracic kyphosis correction, and lumbar lordosis were not statistically significant. Patients in group B showed better postoperative (P = 0.031) and final (P = 0.030) main thoracic curve correction (76.8 and 75.6 %, respectively) than patients in group A (68.3 and 67.7 %, respectively). Patients in group B had better thoracolumbar or lumbar curve correction (85.8 %) than those in group A (76.8 %; P = 0.048). The differences in blood loss and operation time were not statistically significant (P = 0.094 and P = 0.060, respectively). Hospital stay was longer (P = 0.001) and patient cost was higher (P < 0.001) for patients in group B. One patient in group A required ventilator support for 12 h after anterior surgery. One transient dyspnea occurred in group B. No neurologic deficits occurred in either group. Anterior release with posterior internal distraction produces better corrective effects than anterior and posterior VCR, though hospital stay and costs are greater.
引用
收藏
页码:1237 / 1243
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Posterior vertebral column resection for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis after failed anterior instrumented fusion
    Lu, Jian
    Dai, Zhe-Hao
    Li, Hai-Sheng
    Kang, Yi-Jun
    Chen, Fei
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (29) : E20982
  • [32] Comparison of posterior vertebral column resection and anterior corpectomy and instrumentation for correcting late post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis
    Wang, Hui
    Wang, Tao
    Ma, Lei
    Wang, Yanhong
    Yang, Dalong
    Yang, Sidong
    Ding, Wen-Yuan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (09): : 17435 - 17441
  • [33] Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Versus Multiple Posterior Column Osteotomies in Severe and Rigid Neuromuscular Scoliosis
    Bekmez, Senol
    Ozhan, Mehmet
    Olgun, Zeynep Deniz
    Suzer, Anil
    Ayvaz, Mehmet
    Demirkiran, Halil Gokhan
    Karaagaoglu, Ergun
    Yazici, Muharrem
    SPINE, 2018, 43 (15) : E905 - E910
  • [34] Anterior Column Realignment Through Open Pre-posterior Release-Anterior-Posterior Fusion Versus Hybrid Minimally Invasive-Anterior-Posterior Fusion for Dynamic Sagittal Imbalance of the Spine
    Ahn, Joonghyun
    Ha, Kee-Yong
    Kim, Yong-Chan
    Kim, Ki-Tack
    Kim, Sung-Min
    Ko, Taeyoung
    Kim, Sang-Il
    Kim, Young-Hoon
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (01) : 48 - 58
  • [35] Posterior Approach Alone Versus Combined Anterior and Posterior Approach in the Management of Vertebral Tuberculosis
    Demirel, Mehmet
    Akgul, Turgut
    Pehlivanoglu, Tuna
    Karademir, Gokhan
    Bayram, Serkan
    Dikici, Fatih
    Sar, Cuneyt
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 29 (05) : 724 - 733
  • [36] Comparison of 1-stage versus 2-stage anterior and posterior spinal fusion for severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis -: A randomized prospective study
    Shen, Jianxiong
    Qiu, Guixing
    Wang, Yipeng
    Zhang, Zhihai
    Zhao, Yu
    SPINE, 2006, 31 (22) : 2525 - 2528
  • [37] Commentary: Is a two-staged anterior-posterior vertebral column resection (VCR) safer than a posterior-only VCR approach for severe pediatric deformities?
    Daubs, Michael D.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (05): : 487 - 488
  • [38] Posterior only versus combined anterior and posterior approaches to lumbar scoliosis in adults -: A radiographic analysis
    Pateder, Dhruv B.
    Kebaish, Khaled M.
    Cascio, Brett M.
    Neubaeur, Phillip
    Matusz, David M.
    Kostuik, John P.
    SPINE, 2007, 32 (14) : 1551 - 1554
  • [39] Comparison of Thoracoscopic Anterior Release Combined With Posterior Spinal Fusion Versus Posterior-only Approach With an All-pedicle Screw Construct in the Treatment of Rigid Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Shi, Zhicai
    Chen, Jiayu
    Wang, Chao
    Li, Ming
    Li, Quan
    Zhang, Ye
    Li, Cheng
    Qiao, Yuehua
    Guo Kaijin
    Chen Xiangyang
    Ran, Bo
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (08): : E454 - E459
  • [40] Posterior total resection of the vertebral column for severe kyphoscoliosis: A case report
    Li, Zhongfeng
    Chen, Youying
    Li, Zhenhao
    Deng, Qiang
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (12) : 5700 - 5701