Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review

被引:69
|
作者
Sneegas, Gretchen [1 ]
Beckner, Sydney [2 ]
Brannstrom, Christian [1 ]
Jepson, Wendy [1 ]
Lee, Kyungsun [1 ]
Seghezzo, Lucas [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, 3147 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Water Resources Inst, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Nacl Salta UNSa, CONICET, Inst Invest Energia No Convenc INENCO, Salta, Argentina
关键词
STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSTRUCTIVE CONFLICT; FLOOD MANAGEMENT; CORE BELIEFS; WIND ENERGY; LAND-USE; DISCOURSES; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106864
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Q-methodology is a mixed qualitative-quantitative method used to measure social perspectives on issues relating to sustainability and environmental governance in a systematic, replicable manner. Although its use grown over the past two decades, to date there has not been a comprehensive review of the environmental sustainability Q-methodology literature. Using bibliometric analysis and systematic review, this paper examines the rapid growth in published Q-methodology research on sustainable natural resource management and environmental governance. We analysed and iteratively coded 277 empirical Q-studies published between 2000-2018 to establish research trends, shared gaps, and best practices among environmental social science Q-researchers. We also conducted co-authorship and co-citation analyses to identify research clusters using Q-methodology. We find that, while Q-methodology uses a relatively standardized protocol, considerable heterogeneity persists across such domains as study design, p-set identification, concourse and Q-set development, analysis and interpretation. Further, we identify major reporting gaps among Q methodology publications where researchers do not fully describe or justify subjective decision-making throughout the research process. The paper ends with recommendations for improving research reporting and increasing the circulation and uptake of up-to-date Q-methodology practices and innovations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research
    Churruca, Kate
    Ludlow, Kristiana
    Wu, Wendy
    Gibbons, Kate
    Nguyen, Hoa Mi
    Ellis, Louise A.
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [2] A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research
    Kate Churruca
    Kristiana Ludlow
    Wendy Wu
    Kate Gibbons
    Hoa Mi Nguyen
    Louise A. Ellis
    Jeffrey Braithwaite
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
  • [3] Q-methodology and tourism research
    Stergiou, Dimitrios
    Airey, David
    [J]. CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2011, 14 (04) : 311 - 322
  • [4] Assessing Sustainability Perspectives in Rural Innovation Projects Using Q-Methodology
    Hermans, Frans
    Kok, Kasper
    Beers, Pieter J.
    Veldkamp, Tom
    [J]. SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2012, 52 (01) : 70 - 91
  • [5] Considering sustainability in project management decision making; An investigation using Q-methodology
    Silvius, A. J. Gilbert
    Kampinga, Martin
    Paniagua, Silvana
    Mooi, Herman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (06) : 1133 - 1150
  • [6] Q-METHODOLOGY - RELEVANCE AND APPLICATION TO NURSING RESEARCH
    DENNIS, KE
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NURSING SCIENCE, 1986, 8 (03) : 6 - 17
  • [7] qfactor: A command for Q-methodology analysis
    Akhtar-Danesh, Noori
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (02): : 432 - 446
  • [8] Warehouse Management Systems for Social and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis
    Minashkina, Daria
    Happonen, Ari
    [J]. LOGISTICS-BASEL, 2023, 7 (03):
  • [9] Child and Adolescent Psychodynamic Therapy: Using Q-Methodology in Process Research
    Goodman, Geoff
    [J]. PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDY OF THE CHILD, 2022, 75 (01) : 260 - 277
  • [10] Regional Development and Sustainability: Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis
    Silva Rincon, Julio Cesar
    Pabon Leon, Jhon Antuny
    Barrientos Monsalve, Ender Jose
    [J]. REVISTA UNIVERSIDAD EMPRESA, 2021, 23 (41):