Considering sustainability in project management decision making; An investigation using Q-methodology

被引:132
|
作者
Silvius, A. J. Gilbert [1 ,2 ]
Kampinga, Martin [3 ]
Paniagua, Silvana [4 ]
Mooi, Herman [4 ]
机构
[1] LOI Univ Appl Sci, Leiderdorp, Netherlands
[2] Univ Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
[3] Inholland Univ Appl Sci, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Project; Project management; Sustainability; Triple constraint; Decision-making; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Sustainability is one of the most important challenges of our time. Projects play a pivotal role in the realization of more sustainable business practices and the concept of sustainability has also been linked to project management. However, how managers of projects consider sustainability in their operational daily work is still to be explored. This paper uses Q-methodology to investigate the consideration of sustainability aspects in the decision making processes of project managers. The research question was How are dimensions of sustainability considered in the decision making processes of project managers in relation to the triple constraint of time, cost and quality? Based on the Q-sort of selected respondents, the study found that the consideration of sustainability principles is underrepresented, compared to the triple constraint criteria. However, the analysis of the individual Q-sorts revealed four distinct perspectives that differ significantly in their consideration of sustainability principles and triple constraint criteria. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd, APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1133 / 1150
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Q-methodology and farmers' decision-making
    van Dijk, Ruben
    Zambrano, Juan Carlo Intriago
    Diehl, Jan Carel
    Ertsen, Maurits W.
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6
  • [2] Assessing Sustainability Perspectives in Rural Innovation Projects Using Q-Methodology
    Hermans, Frans
    Kok, Kasper
    Beers, Pieter J.
    Veldkamp, Tom
    SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2012, 52 (01) : 70 - 91
  • [3] Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review
    Sneegas, Gretchen
    Beckner, Sydney
    Brannstrom, Christian
    Jepson, Wendy
    Lee, Kyungsun
    Seghezzo, Lucas
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 180
  • [4] Learning from farmers' knowledge on participatory irrigation management using Q-methodology
    Kimbowa, George
    Wanyama, Joshua
    Mukaya, Muhmoud
    Otim, Daniel
    Awio, Thomas
    Mugisha, Moses
    IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2025, 74 (01) : 342 - 361
  • [5] Perspectives on Closure and Revitalisation of Extraction Sites and Sustainability: A Q-Methodology Study
    Streit, Stefanie
    Tost, Michael
    Gugerell, Katharina
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2023, 12 (02):
  • [6] POLICY ANALYSTS ROLES AND VALUE ORIENTATIONS - AN EMPIRICAL-INVESTIGATION USING Q-METHODOLOGY
    DURNING, D
    OSUNA, W
    JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 1994, 13 (04) : 629 - 657
  • [7] Study on information security risk management based Q-methodology
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Ning, Fangwei
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2011, : 384 - 390
  • [8] Decision Making Methodology to Support the Project Implementation of Knowledge Management in Business
    Vasquez Paniagua, Jose Alfredo
    Martinez Crespo, Jenny
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 904 - 912
  • [9] Public agricultural extension workers as boundary workers: identifying sustainability perspectives in agriculture using Q-methodology
    Wijaya, Atika
    Offermans, Astrid
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION & EXTENSION, 2019, 25 (01): : 3 - 24
  • [10] Envisioning the driverless city using backcasting and Q-methodology
    Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Esther
    Cordera, Ruben
    Stead, Dominic
    Nogues, Soledad
    CITIES, 2023, 133