Using Q-methodology in environmental sustainability research: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review

被引:69
|
作者
Sneegas, Gretchen [1 ]
Beckner, Sydney [2 ]
Brannstrom, Christian [1 ]
Jepson, Wendy [1 ]
Lee, Kyungsun [1 ]
Seghezzo, Lucas [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Geog, 3147 TAMU, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Texas Water Resources Inst, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Nacl Salta UNSa, CONICET, Inst Invest Energia No Convenc INENCO, Salta, Argentina
关键词
STAKEHOLDER PERSPECTIVES; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSTRUCTIVE CONFLICT; FLOOD MANAGEMENT; CORE BELIEFS; WIND ENERGY; LAND-USE; DISCOURSES; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106864
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Q-methodology is a mixed qualitative-quantitative method used to measure social perspectives on issues relating to sustainability and environmental governance in a systematic, replicable manner. Although its use grown over the past two decades, to date there has not been a comprehensive review of the environmental sustainability Q-methodology literature. Using bibliometric analysis and systematic review, this paper examines the rapid growth in published Q-methodology research on sustainable natural resource management and environmental governance. We analysed and iteratively coded 277 empirical Q-studies published between 2000-2018 to establish research trends, shared gaps, and best practices among environmental social science Q-researchers. We also conducted co-authorship and co-citation analyses to identify research clusters using Q-methodology. We find that, while Q-methodology uses a relatively standardized protocol, considerable heterogeneity persists across such domains as study design, p-set identification, concourse and Q-set development, analysis and interpretation. Further, we identify major reporting gaps among Q methodology publications where researchers do not fully describe or justify subjective decision-making throughout the research process. The paper ends with recommendations for improving research reporting and increasing the circulation and uptake of up-to-date Q-methodology practices and innovations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analysis of environmental taxes publications: a bibliometric and systematic literature review
    Bashir, Muhammad Farhan
    Ma, Benjiang
    Bilal
    Komal, Bushra
    Bashir, Muhammad Adnan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (16) : 20700 - 20716
  • [32] Capturing practitioner perspectives on infrastructure resilience using Q-methodology
    Kim, Yeowon
    Grimm, Nancy B.
    Chester, Mikhail, V
    Redman, Charles L.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH: INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 1 (02):
  • [33] Why do pregnant women participate in research? A patient participation investigation using Q-Methodology
    Meshaka, Riwa
    Jeffares, Stephen
    Sadrudin, Farah
    Huisman, Nicole
    Saravanan, Ponnusamy
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (02) : 188 - 197
  • [34] Bibliometric analysis and systematic review of electrochemical methods for environmental remediation
    Huang, Wenbin
    Liu, Shibin
    Zhang, Tao
    Wu, Hao
    Pu, Shengyan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 144 : 113 - 136
  • [35] Analysis of environmental taxes publications: a bibliometric and systematic literature review
    Muhammad Farhan Bashir
    Benjiang MA
    Bushra Bilal
    Muhammad Adnan Komal
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 20700 - 20716
  • [36] Exploring Nursing Students' Perspectives on Telenursing Using Q-methodology
    Kim, Ick-Jee
    Kim, Mi Sook
    Jeon, Min Kyung
    [J]. CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2021, 39 (12) : 1007 - 1016
  • [37] Prioritizing Research Needs in Natural Resources: Using Q-Methodology as a Focus Group Discussion Tool
    Edgeley, Catrin M.
    Stasiewicz, Amanda M.
    Hammond, Darcy H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 2020, 118 (06) : 569 - 575
  • [38] An empirical research of e-learners' learning styles by Q-methodology
    Liu, Chung-Chu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND LEARNING, 2008, 5 (06) : 633 - 650
  • [39] How to Use Q-Methodology in Dream Research: Assumptions, Procedures and Benefits
    Parker, Jennifer
    Alford, Chris
    [J]. DREAMING, 2010, 20 (03) : 169 - 183
  • [40] Using Q-methodology to guide the implementation of new healthcare policies
    Alderson, Sarah
    Foy, Robbie
    Bryant, Louise
    Ahmed, Shenaz
    House, Allan
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2018, 27 (09) : 737 - 742