Errors induced by spectral measurement positions and instrument noise in soil organic carbon prediction using vis-NIR on intact soil

被引:5
|
作者
Sun, Xiao-Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Soil spectroscopy; Error analysis; Sampling positions; Instrument noise; DIFFUSE-REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY; IN-SITU; NEURAL-NETWORK; LEAST-SQUARES; CLAY CONTENT; MOISTURE; FIELD; PROPAGATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114731
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Soil spectroscopy potentially would become a routine method for the measurement of soil properties in the field on soil cores. However, many factors could lead to errors in the measurement of spectra from intact soil cores. So far, errors induced by spectral measurement positions and instrument noise have rarely been quantified. The present study evaluated these errors based on 160 intact ring core samples collected from 20 profiles in a forest, southwest China. Each ring sample was scanned using a visible near-infrared (vis-NIR) spectrometer at nine evenly distributed positions at both ends of the ring to characterize within-sample variability. In addition, 10 scans were made at each position to characterize instrument error. A position spectrum was then calculated by averaging the 10 scans at each position, while a sample spectrum was calculated by averaging all 180 scans of each sample. The samples were then tested for soil organic carbon (SOC) content using the wet oxidation method. Based on the sample spectra and SOC content, a partial least squares regression (PLSR) model was calibrated. The modeling error was empirically calculated. Each scan, position spectrum, and sample spectrum was then fed into the calibrated PLSR model to predict SOC content, and the prediction results were evaluated for errors induced by instrument noise and different spectral measurement positions. Results showed that the error induced by different spectral measurement positions was about 75% of the modeling error, while the error induced by instrument noise was small and negligible. These three errors in terms of standard error of prediction (SEP) accounted for 18.6%, 23.8% and 1.46% of the average measured SOC content of the samples, respectively. Besides, the error due to different soil core sampling positions was also considerable. In terms of SEP, this error accounted for 12.5% of the average measured SOC content. These quantified error budgets would help to account for uncertainty in the measurement of soil properties using spectroscopy in the field.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] VIS-NIR Hyperspectral Prediction of Soil Organic Matter Based on Stacking Generalization Model
    Zhang Xiu-quan
    Li Zhi-wei
    Zheng De-cong
    Song Hai-yan
    Wang Guo-liang
    SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 43 (03) : 903 - 910
  • [32] Prediction of soil properties using laboratory VIS-NIR spectroscopy and Hyperion imagery
    Lu, Peng
    Wang, Li
    Niu, Zheng
    Li, Linghao
    Zhang, Wenhao
    JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 2013, 132 : 26 - 33
  • [33] Soil organic carbon prediction by hyperspectral remote sensing and field vis-NIR spectroscopy: An Australian case study
    Gomez, Cecile
    Rossel, Raphael A. Viscarra
    McBratney, Alex B.
    GEODERMA, 2008, 146 (3-4) : 403 - 411
  • [34] In-situ prediction of soil organic carbon by vis-NIR spectroscopy: an efficient use of limited field data
    Kuehnel, A.
    Bogner, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2017, 68 (05) : 689 - 702
  • [35] Non-biased prediction of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen with vis-NIR spectroscopy, as affected by soil moisture content and texture
    Kuang, Boyan
    Mouazen, Abdul M.
    BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2013, 114 (03) : 249 - 258
  • [36] Can soil organic carbon in long-term experiments be detected using Vis-NIR spectroscopy?
    Barbetti, Roberto
    Palazzi, Francesco
    Chiarabaglio, Pier Mario
    Fondon, Carlos Lozano
    Rizza, Daniele
    Rocci, Alessandro
    Grignani, Carlo
    Zavattaro, Laura
    Moretti, Barbara
    Fantappie, Maria
    Monaco, Stefano
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, METROAGRIFOR, 2023, : 154 - 159
  • [37] Soil organic carbon (SOC) prediction in Australian sugarcane fields using Vis-NIR spectroscopy with different model setting approaches
    Zhao, Xueyu
    Zhao, Dongxue
    Wang, Jie
    Triantafilis, John
    GEODERMA REGIONAL, 2022, 30
  • [38] Reducing the Moisture Effect and Improving the Prediction of Soil Organic Matter With VIS-NIR Spectroscopy in Black Soil Area
    Tan, Yang
    Jiang, Qigang
    Yu, Longfei
    Liu, Huaxin
    Zhang, Bo
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 5895 - 5905
  • [39] Estimation of Organic Carbon in Anthropogenic Soil by VIS-NIR Spectroscopy: Effect of Variable Selection
    Xu, Lu
    Hong, Yongsheng
    Wei, Yu
    Guo, Long
    Shi, Tiezhu
    Liu, Yi
    Jiang, Qinghu
    Fei, Teng
    Liu, Yaolin
    Mouazen, Abdul M.
    Chen, Yiyun
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (20) : 1 - 18
  • [40] Soil Organic Carbon Prediction by Vis-NIR Spectroscopy: Case Study the Kur-Aras Plain, Azerbaijan
    Amin, Ismayilov
    Fikrat, Feyziyev
    Mammadov, Elton
    Babayev, Maharram
    COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2020, 51 (06) : 726 - 734