Efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus apatinib in the treatment of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative retrospective study

被引:21
|
作者
Wang, Yizhuo [1 ,2 ]
Gou, Qing [1 ]
Xu, Rongde [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoming [1 ]
Zhou, Zejian [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Gen Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Intervent Oncol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Shantou Univ, Med Coll, Shantou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY | 2018年 / 11卷
关键词
observational; HCC; sorafenib; apatinib; overall survival; progression-free survival; CELL-PROLIFERATION; TYROSINE KINASE; PHASE-II; INHIBITOR; THERAPY; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2147/OTT.S161023
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of sorafenib and apatinib in patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study where we collected the clinical data of 72 patients, diagnosed with intermediate or advanced HCC from January 2014 to December 2016. Depending on the treatment received, 38 patients were categorized into group S (sorafenib group) and 34 into group A (apatinib group). The patients in group A received the initial recommended dose of 750 mg once daily (QD), which was reduced to 250 mg QD in the case of any class 3 or 4 adverse event (AE). Sorafenib was administered orally 400 mg twice daily (BID), and dose was modified to 400 mg or 200 mg QD in the case of grade 3 or 4 AEs. The median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and AEs reported in the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: Among the 38 patients treated with sorafenib, one patient had complete response (CR), 5 patients had partial response (PR), and 10 patients had stable disease (SD), and among the 34 patients treated with apatinib, 6 patients had PR and 7 patients had SD with no cases of CR. PFS in group S was significantly longer compared with that in group A (7.39 vs 4.79 months, respectively, P=0.031). Similar observations were made for median OS (10.4 months in group S vs 7.18 months in group A, P=0.011). However, there was no significant difference in the objective response rates (ORRs) among the study population (15.7 vs 17.6%, P=0.829). Common AEs in group S included hand and foot syndrome (HFS) and diarrhea, whereas common AEs in group A included hypertension, proteinuria, and increased transaminase. Conclusion: Our study showed promising clinical outcome with apatinib, but the sorafenib group exhibited better clinical efficacy with no significant difference in safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:3407 / 3413
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy of camrelizumab and apatinib combination therapy versus apatinib only in treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.
    Swed, Sarya
    Motawea, Karam R.
    AbdelQadir, Yossef Hassan
    Gamal, Mohamed
    El-Sakka, Amro A.
    Kandil, Omneya A.
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    Abdelaziz, Muhammad
    Wahsh, Engy A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16) : E16147 - E16147
  • [32] Original Comparison of efficacy and safety between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib versus TACE combined with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Xu, Rui
    Ji, Xuebing
    Pei, Xiaohong
    Yu, Yongqiang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2023, 15 (02): : 1117 - 1128
  • [33] Camrelizumab Plus Sorafenib Versus Sorafenib Monotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis
    Liu, Qinqin
    You, Nan
    Li, Jing
    Wu, Ke
    Peng, Xuehui
    Wang, Zheng
    Wang, Liang
    Zhu, Yinan
    Zheng, Lu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [34] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SORAFENIB FOR HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: A MULTI-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY IN JAPAN
    Kaneko, Shuichi
    Furuse, Junji
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Ikeda, Kenji
    HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 54 : 1403A - 1403A
  • [35] Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Luo, Jia
    Gao, Benjian
    Lin, Zhiyu
    Fan, Hua
    Ma, Wen
    Yu, Danfei
    Yang, Qian
    Tian, Jing
    Yang, Xiaoli
    Li, Bo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [36] Efficacy and safety of apatinib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization as second-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study
    Li, Tao
    Zhao, Jingfang
    Zhang, Shuai
    Wang, Hui
    Sun, Linlin
    Hu, Jinhua
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 19 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [37] Clinical efficacy of TACE combined with Apatinib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Zhu, Yuxia
    Feng, Bo
    Mei, Lin
    Sun, Ruiqing
    Guo, Changcun
    Zhu, Jiangyi
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2019, 24 (02): : 608 - 614
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Meng, Lingbin
    Zheng, Zhuangzhuang
    Ji, Rui
    Xu, Xiaochun
    Xin, Ying
    Jiang, Xin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (16)
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: age is not a problem
    Ziogas, Dimitrios C.
    Papadatos-Pastos, Dionysios
    Thillai, Kiruthikah
    Korantzis, Ippokratis
    Chowdhury, Ruhe
    Suddle, Abid
    O'Grady, John
    Al-Khadimi, Gillian
    Allen, Natalie
    Heaton, Nigel
    Ross, Paul J.
    Sarkera, Debashis
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 29 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [40] Efficacy of Ramucirumab Versus Sorafenib as Subsequent Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Maesaka, Kazuki
    Sakamori, Ryotaro
    Yamada, Ryoko
    Tahata, Yuki
    Ohkawa, Kazuyoshi
    Oshita, Masahide
    Tamura, Shinji
    Hagiwara, Hideki
    Mita, Eiji
    Yakushijin, Takayuki
    Inada, Masami
    Kodama, Takahiro
    Hikita, Hayato
    Tatsumi, Tomohide
    Takehara, Tetsuo
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (04) : 2187 - 2192