Efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus apatinib in the treatment of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparative retrospective study

被引:21
|
作者
Wang, Yizhuo [1 ,2 ]
Gou, Qing [1 ]
Xu, Rongde [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoming [1 ]
Zhou, Zejian [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Gen Hosp, Guangdong Acad Med Sci, Dept Intervent Oncol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Shantou Univ, Med Coll, Shantou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY | 2018年 / 11卷
关键词
observational; HCC; sorafenib; apatinib; overall survival; progression-free survival; CELL-PROLIFERATION; TYROSINE KINASE; PHASE-II; INHIBITOR; THERAPY; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.2147/OTT.S161023
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of sorafenib and apatinib in patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective study where we collected the clinical data of 72 patients, diagnosed with intermediate or advanced HCC from January 2014 to December 2016. Depending on the treatment received, 38 patients were categorized into group S (sorafenib group) and 34 into group A (apatinib group). The patients in group A received the initial recommended dose of 750 mg once daily (QD), which was reduced to 250 mg QD in the case of any class 3 or 4 adverse event (AE). Sorafenib was administered orally 400 mg twice daily (BID), and dose was modified to 400 mg or 200 mg QD in the case of grade 3 or 4 AEs. The median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and AEs reported in the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: Among the 38 patients treated with sorafenib, one patient had complete response (CR), 5 patients had partial response (PR), and 10 patients had stable disease (SD), and among the 34 patients treated with apatinib, 6 patients had PR and 7 patients had SD with no cases of CR. PFS in group S was significantly longer compared with that in group A (7.39 vs 4.79 months, respectively, P=0.031). Similar observations were made for median OS (10.4 months in group S vs 7.18 months in group A, P=0.011). However, there was no significant difference in the objective response rates (ORRs) among the study population (15.7 vs 17.6%, P=0.829). Common AEs in group S included hand and foot syndrome (HFS) and diarrhea, whereas common AEs in group A included hypertension, proteinuria, and increased transaminase. Conclusion: Our study showed promising clinical outcome with apatinib, but the sorafenib group exhibited better clinical efficacy with no significant difference in safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:3407 / 3413
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Camrelizumab combined with sorafenib versus sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective study
    Liu, Q.
    Li, J.
    You, N.
    Wu, K.
    Wang, Z.
    Zhu, Y.
    Wang, L.
    Zheng, L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2020, 31 : S131 - S132
  • [22] Effect and safety of sorafenib in patients with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma who received transarterial chemoembolization: A retrospective comparative study
    Lei, Xue-Fen
    Ke, Yang
    Bao, Tian-Hao
    Tang, Hao-Ran
    Wu, Xue-Song
    Shi, Zhi-Tian
    Lin, Jie
    Zhang, Zhi-Xian
    Gu, Hou
    Wang, Lin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2018, 6 (05) : 74 - 83
  • [23] Effect and safety of sorafenib in patients with intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma who received transarterial chemoembolization: A retrospective comparative study
    Xue-Fen Lei
    Yang Ke
    Tian-Hao Bao
    Hao-Ran Tang
    Xue-Song Wu
    Zhi-Tian Shi
    Jie Lin
    Zhi-Xian Zhang
    Hou Gu
    Lin Wang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2018, 6 (05) : 74 - 83
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of TACE in combination with sorafenib for the treatment of TACE-refractory advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese patients: a retrospective study
    Wu, Jianbing
    Li, An
    Yang, Jiajin
    Lu, Yanjun
    Li, Jie
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 : 2761 - 2768
  • [25] Assessment of efficacy and safety of sorafenib versus no treatment in Egyptian hepatocellular carcinoma patients
    El Baghdady, N. S. E. D.
    El Wakeel, L.
    Ellithy, M. A.
    Eltohamy, N.
    Shaheen, S. M.
    El Naggar, A. E. R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [26] Safety and Effectiveness of Sorafenib in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Prasanthan, Ardra Thottarath
    Raju, Dona
    Vinayakumar, Syamaprasad Thachethukunnil
    Jacob, Mary
    Chandran, Anand
    Vijayan, Meenu
    Keechilatu, Pavithran
    CURRENT CANCER THERAPY REVIEWS, 2022, 18 (02) : 148 - 151
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in elderly patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Marta, Guilherme Nader
    da Fonseca, Leonardo G.
    Braghiroli, Maria Ignez
    Moura, Fernando
    Hoff, Paulo M.
    Sabbaga, Jorge
    CLINICS, 2021, 76 : 1 - 6
  • [28] Safety and Efficacy of Camrelizumab Combined with Apatinib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Yuan, Guosheng
    Cheng, Xiao
    Li, Qi
    Zang, Mengya
    Huang, Wei
    Fan, Wenzhe
    Wu, Tao
    Ruan, Jian
    Dai, Wencong
    Yu, Wenxuan
    Chen, Mian
    Guo, Yabing
    Hu, Xiaoyun
    Chen, Jinzhang
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2020, 13 : 12683 - 12693
  • [29] The efficacy and safety of LDF, a Chinese herbal formula, compared with sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese patients: a retrospective cohort study
    Liang, Xiao
    Hu, Xiao-Yu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (01): : 126 - 133
  • [30] Efficacy, Safety, and Survival Factors for Sorafenib Treatment in Japanese Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Nakano, Masahito
    Tanaka, Masatoshi
    Kuromatsu, Ryoko
    Nagamatsu, Hiroaki
    Sakata, Kenji
    Matsugaki, Satoru
    Kajiwara, Masahiko
    Fukuizumi, Kunitaka
    Tajiri, Nobuyoshi
    Matsukuma, Norito
    Sakai, Terufumi
    Ono, Noriyuki
    Yano, Yoichi
    Koga, Hironori
    Kurogi, Junichi
    Takata, Akio
    Sumie, Shuji
    Satani, Manabu
    Yamada, Shingo
    Niizeki, Takashi
    Aino, Hajime
    Iwamoto, Hideki
    Torimura, Takuji
    Sata, Michio
    ONCOLOGY, 2013, 84 (02) : 108 - 114