Model uncertainty and the management of a system of infrastructure facilities

被引:63
|
作者
Kuhn, KD [1 ]
Madanat, SM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
infrastructure management; epistemic uncertainty; robust optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2006.02.001
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The network-level infrastructure management problem involves selecting and scheduling maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MR&R) activities on networks of infrastructure facilities so as to maintain the level of service provided by the network in a cost-effective manner. This problem is frequently formulated as a Markov decision problem (MDP) solved via linear programming (LP). The conditions of facilities are represented by elements of discrete condition rating sets, and transition probabilities are employed to describe deterioration processes. Epistemic and parametric uncertainties not considered within the standard MDP/LP framework are associated with the transition probabilities used in infrastructure management optimization routines. This paper contrasts the expected costs incurred when model uncertainty is ignored with those incurred when this uncertainty is explicitly considered using robust optimization. A case study involving a network-level pavement management MDP/LP problem demonstrates how explicitly considering uncertainty may limit worst-case MR&R expenditures. The methods and results can also be used to identify the costs of uncertainty in transition probability matrices used in infrastructure management systems. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:391 / 404
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comprehensive System for Management Roadway Infrastructure
    Paz, Alexander
    Emaasit, Daniel
    de la Fuente-Mella, Hanns
    RECENT PROGRESS ON: MECHANICAL, INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 2227
  • [42] EV: Communication Infrastructure Management System
    Dhianeshwar, Anitha
    Kaur, Prabhjot
    Nagarajan, Sreehari
    2016 FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE GREEN BUILDINGS AND COMMUNITIES (SGBC), 2016,
  • [43] Integrating building management system and facilities management on the Internet
    Wang, SW
    Xie, JL
    AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2002, 11 (06) : 707 - 715
  • [44] Examples of implementation of a multi-model qualimetric method for system optimization of marine engineering and marine infrastructure facilities
    Alekseev, Anatoly, V
    MARINE INTELLECTUAL TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, (02): : 69 - 81
  • [45] Capacity investment model for airport facilities under demand uncertainty
    Sun, Yanshuo
    Schonfeld, Paul M.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2016, 50 (08) : 1896 - 1911
  • [46] Wireless strain sensing system for assessing condition of civil infrastructure facilities
    Sundaram, Arun B.
    Ravisankar, K.
    Senthil, R.
    Parivallal, S.
    GRADEVINAR, 2016, 68 (03): : 221 - 227
  • [47] A disaster recovery system featuring uncertainty visualization and distributed infrastructure
    Grewe, L.
    Krishnagiri, S.
    Cristobal, J.
    SENSORS, AND COMMAND, CONTROL, COMMUNICATIONS AND INTELLIGENCE (C31) TECHNOLOGIES FOR HOMELAND SECURITY AND HOMELAND DEFENSE VI, 2007, 6538
  • [48] Infrastructure Asset Management for Different Types of Facilities Using Normalized Level of Service
    Chae, Myung Jin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING ASSET MANAGEMENT (WCEAM 2012), 2015, : 155 - 159
  • [49] Designing facilities management needs into infrastructure projects: Case from a major hospital
    Edum-Fotwe, FT
    Egbu, C
    Gibb, AGF
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2003, 17 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [50] Essentiality of Management of Facilities and Infrastructure toward a Number of Students of Early Years Institution
    Alkadri, Hanif
    Santoso, Yulianto
    Ningrum, Tia Ayu
    Afriansyah, Hade
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION (ICECE 2017), 2017, 169 : 77 - 79