Model uncertainty and the management of a system of infrastructure facilities

被引:66
|
作者
Kuhn, KD [1 ]
Madanat, SM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
infrastructure management; epistemic uncertainty; robust optimization;
D O I
10.1016/j.trc.2006.02.001
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The network-level infrastructure management problem involves selecting and scheduling maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MR&R) activities on networks of infrastructure facilities so as to maintain the level of service provided by the network in a cost-effective manner. This problem is frequently formulated as a Markov decision problem (MDP) solved via linear programming (LP). The conditions of facilities are represented by elements of discrete condition rating sets, and transition probabilities are employed to describe deterioration processes. Epistemic and parametric uncertainties not considered within the standard MDP/LP framework are associated with the transition probabilities used in infrastructure management optimization routines. This paper contrasts the expected costs incurred when model uncertainty is ignored with those incurred when this uncertainty is explicitly considered using robust optimization. A case study involving a network-level pavement management MDP/LP problem demonstrates how explicitly considering uncertainty may limit worst-case MR&R expenditures. The methods and results can also be used to identify the costs of uncertainty in transition probability matrices used in infrastructure management systems. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 404
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrating resilience into asset management of infrastructure systems with a focus on building facilities
    Izaddoost, Ali
    Naderpajouh, Nader
    Heravi, Gholamreza
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2021, 44 (44):
  • [32] Including uncertainty in valuing blue and green infrastructure for stormwater management
    Ashley, Richard
    Gersonius, Berry
    Digman, Christopher
    Horton, Bruce
    Smith, Brian
    Shaffer, Paul
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 33 : 237 - 246
  • [33] Bayesian system ID: optimal management of parameter, model, and measurement uncertainty
    Galioto, Nicholas
    Gorodetsky, Alex Arkady
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2020, 102 (01) : 241 - 267
  • [34] Bayesian system ID: optimal management of parameter, model, and measurement uncertainty
    Nicholas Galioto
    Alex Arkady Gorodetsky
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2020, 102 : 241 - 267
  • [35] A Two-Stage Model for Project Optimization in Transportation Infrastructure Management System
    Chen, Zhang
    Liu, Liyuan
    Li, Li
    Li, Hui
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2014, 2014
  • [36] A business model for uncertainty management
    Koh, S. C. L.
    Gunasekaran, A.
    Saad, S. M.
    BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2005, 12 (04) : 383 - 400
  • [37] INFRASTRUCTURE-MANAGEMENT-SYSTEM ANALYSIS
    THORNTON, WJ
    ULRICH, HD
    JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-ASCE, 1993, 119 (01): : 39 - 46
  • [38] The Sustainable Infrastructure Management Model (SIMM)
    Okon, B. B.
    Elhag, T. S. M.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, WCECS 2012, VOL II, 2012, : 1361 - 1364
  • [39] MODEL FOR RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
    Stojic, Gordan
    Veskovic, Slavko
    Tanackov, Ilija
    Milinkovic, Sanjin
    PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2012, 24 (02): : 99 - 107
  • [40] A municipal infrastructure management systems model
    Curtis, FA
    Molnar, GS
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1997, 24 (06) : 1040 - 1049