Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Use with the MiniMedTM 670G System

被引:39
|
作者
Hsu, Liana [1 ,2 ]
Buckingham, Bruce [1 ,2 ]
Basina, Marina [2 ,3 ]
Ekhlaspour, Laya [1 ,2 ]
von Eyben, Rie [4 ]
Wang, Justin [2 ]
Lal, Rayhan A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Div Endocrinol, Sch Med, Room G-313 Med Ctr,300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Diabet Res Ctr, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Ultrafast-acting insulin analogs; Closed-loop systems; Artificial pancreas; Type; 1; diabetes; Insulin pumps; ONSET;
D O I
10.1089/dia.2020.0083
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ultrarapid insulin Fiasp(R) in the hybrid closed-loop MiniMed (TM) 670G system. Methods: This was a pilot randomized double-blinded crossover study among established MiniMed (TM) 670G users comparing percentage time in range (TIR) and hypoglycemia for Novolog(R) and Fiasp. After 2 weeks optimization with their home insulin, participants were randomized to receive Novolog or Fiasp for 2 weeks, followed by the other insulin for the next 2 weeks. Data from the second week of blinded insulin use were analyzed to allow 1 week for 670G adaptation. During the second week, individuals were asked to eat the same breakfast for 3 days to assess differences in meal pharmacodynamics. Results: Nineteen adults were recruited with mean age of 40 +/- 18 years, diabetes duration of 27 +/- 12 years, and median hemoglobin A1c of 7.1% (6.9, 7.5), using 0.72 (0.4, 1.2) units/(kg center dot day). For Novolog and Fiasp, respectively, the %TIR (70-180 mg/dL) was 75.3 +/- 9.5 and 78.4 +/- 9.3; %time 180 mg/dL was 21.6 +/- 9.0 and 19.3 +/- 8.9; mean glucose was 147 +/- 12 and 146 +/- 12 mg/dL; coefficient of variation was 28.6% +/- 4.5% and 26.8% +/- 4.4%; %time in auto mode 86.4 +/- 9.2 and 84.4 +/- 9.2. All comparisons were nonsignificant for insulin type. Total daily dose (Novolog 48.8 +/- 28.4 vs. Fiasp 52.4 +/- 31.7 units; P = 0.01) and daily basal (Novolog 17.6 [15.5, 33.8] vs. Fiasp 19.1 [15.3, 38.5] units; P = 0.07) correlated with TIR and %time >180 mg/dL. For insulin delivery in auto mode there was no statistical difference in total daily dose or daily basal between arms. Paired analysis for matched breakfast meals revealed no significant differences in time to maximum glucose, peak glucose, or glucose excursion. Conclusions: In this pilot study, the use of either Novolog or Fiasp in a commercially available MiniMed 670G system operating in auto mode resulted in clinically similar glycemic outcomes, with a slight increase in daily insulin requirements using Fiasp.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart compared with insulin aspart, both with insulin degludec with or without metformin, in adults with type 2 diabetes
    Lane, W.
    Bozkurt, K.
    Favaro, E.
    Jang, H. C.
    Kjaersgaard, M. I. S.
    Oviedo, A.
    Rose, L.
    Senior, P.
    Sesti, G.
    Soto Gonzalez, A.
    Franek, E.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2019, 62 : S10 - S11
  • [32] COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF MINIMEDTM 670G SYSTEM VERSUS CONTINUOUS SUBCUTANEOUS INSULIN INFUSION, IN INDIVIDUALS WITH TYPE1 DIABETES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
    Roze, S.
    Buompensiere, I.
    Saltik, Z. Ozdemir
    Cohen, O.
    DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 22 : A83 - A83
  • [33] Mealtime fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart for controlling postprandial hyperglycaemia in people with insulin-resistant Type 2 diabetes
    Bowering, K.
    Harvey, J.
    Kolaczynski, J. W.
    Snyder, J. W.
    Bode, B. W.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2019, 36 (06) : 771 - 775
  • [34] Hypoglycemia with Mealtime Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart vs. Insulin Aspart Across Two Large Type 1 Diabetes Trials
    De Block, Christophe
    Carlson, Anders
    Rose, Ludger
    Gondolf, Theis
    Gorst-Rasmussen, Anders
    Lane, Wendy
    DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [35] Improved glycaemic control with carbohydrate counting for adjustment of fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart in subjects with type 1 diabetes
    Twigg, Stephen
    Philis-Tsimikas, Athena
    Bode, Bruce
    Franek, Edward
    Rose, Ludger
    Buchholtz, Kristine
    Demissie, Marek
    Pieber, Thomas R.
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 89 : 64 - 64
  • [36] Improved glycaemic control with carbohydrate counting for adjustment of fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart in subjects with type 1 diabetes
    Philis-Tsimikas, A.
    Bode, B. W.
    Franek, E.
    Rose, L.
    Buchholtz, K.
    Demissie, M.
    Pieber, T. R.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2017, 60 : S315 - S315
  • [37] Improved glycaemic control with carbohydrate counting for adjustment of fast-acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart in subjects with Type 1 diabetes
    Leelarathna, L.
    Philis-Tsimikas, A.
    Bode, B. W.
    Franek, E.
    Rose, L.
    Buchholtz, K.
    Pieber, T. R.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2018, 35 : 19 - 19
  • [38] Minimed 670G: A Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery System
    不详
    MEDICAL LETTER ON DRUGS AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 58 (1508): : 147 - 148
  • [39] Overnight Insulin Delivery and Glucose in Children Using the MiniMed™ 670G System
    Roy, Anirban
    Grosman, Benyamin
    Parikh, Neha
    Wu, Di
    Lee, Scott W.
    Kaufman, Francine R.
    DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [40] Insulin lispro: A fast-acting insulin analog
    Noble, SL
    Johnston, E
    Walton, B
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 1998, 57 (02) : 279 - 286