Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Use with the MiniMedTM 670G System

被引:39
|
作者
Hsu, Liana [1 ,2 ]
Buckingham, Bruce [1 ,2 ]
Basina, Marina [2 ,3 ]
Ekhlaspour, Laya [1 ,2 ]
von Eyben, Rie [4 ]
Wang, Justin [2 ]
Lal, Rayhan A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Pediat, Div Endocrinol, Sch Med, Room G-313 Med Ctr,300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Diabet Res Ctr, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
Ultrafast-acting insulin analogs; Closed-loop systems; Artificial pancreas; Type; 1; diabetes; Insulin pumps; ONSET;
D O I
10.1089/dia.2020.0083
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of ultrarapid insulin Fiasp(R) in the hybrid closed-loop MiniMed (TM) 670G system. Methods: This was a pilot randomized double-blinded crossover study among established MiniMed (TM) 670G users comparing percentage time in range (TIR) and hypoglycemia for Novolog(R) and Fiasp. After 2 weeks optimization with their home insulin, participants were randomized to receive Novolog or Fiasp for 2 weeks, followed by the other insulin for the next 2 weeks. Data from the second week of blinded insulin use were analyzed to allow 1 week for 670G adaptation. During the second week, individuals were asked to eat the same breakfast for 3 days to assess differences in meal pharmacodynamics. Results: Nineteen adults were recruited with mean age of 40 +/- 18 years, diabetes duration of 27 +/- 12 years, and median hemoglobin A1c of 7.1% (6.9, 7.5), using 0.72 (0.4, 1.2) units/(kg center dot day). For Novolog and Fiasp, respectively, the %TIR (70-180 mg/dL) was 75.3 +/- 9.5 and 78.4 +/- 9.3; %time 180 mg/dL was 21.6 +/- 9.0 and 19.3 +/- 8.9; mean glucose was 147 +/- 12 and 146 +/- 12 mg/dL; coefficient of variation was 28.6% +/- 4.5% and 26.8% +/- 4.4%; %time in auto mode 86.4 +/- 9.2 and 84.4 +/- 9.2. All comparisons were nonsignificant for insulin type. Total daily dose (Novolog 48.8 +/- 28.4 vs. Fiasp 52.4 +/- 31.7 units; P = 0.01) and daily basal (Novolog 17.6 [15.5, 33.8] vs. Fiasp 19.1 [15.3, 38.5] units; P = 0.07) correlated with TIR and %time >180 mg/dL. For insulin delivery in auto mode there was no statistical difference in total daily dose or daily basal between arms. Paired analysis for matched breakfast meals revealed no significant differences in time to maximum glucose, peak glucose, or glucose excursion. Conclusions: In this pilot study, the use of either Novolog or Fiasp in a commercially available MiniMed 670G system operating in auto mode resulted in clinically similar glycemic outcomes, with a slight increase in daily insulin requirements using Fiasp.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost impact analysis of mealtime fast-acting insulin aspart compared with insulin aspart in adults with Type 1 diabetes in the UK
    Pollock, R. F.
    Parekh, W.
    Watcham, S.
    Hallen, N.
    DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2019, 36 : 166 - 166
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from Japan
    Kawamura, Tomoyuki
    Kikuchi, Toru
    Horio, Hiroshi
    Rathor, Naveen
    Ekelund, Magnus
    ENDOCRINE JOURNAL, 2021, 68 (04) : 409 - 420
  • [23] Hypoglycaemia with mealtime fast-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart across two large type 1 diabetes trials
    De Block, C.
    Carlson, A.
    Rose, L.
    Gondolf, T.
    Gorst-Rasmussen, A.
    Boesgaard, T. W.
    Lane, W.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2018, 61 : S31 - S32
  • [24] FAST-ACTING INSULIN ASPART: A REVIEW OF ITS PHARMACOKINETIC AND PHARMACODYNAMIC PROPERTIES AND THE CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES
    Haahr, Hanne
    Heise, Tim
    DIABETES MELLITUS, 2020, 23 (02): : 140 - 160
  • [25] Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart: A Review of its Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties and the Clinical Consequences
    Haahr, Hanne
    Heise, Tim
    CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2020, 59 (02) : 155 - 172
  • [26] Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart: A Review of its Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties and the Clinical Consequences
    Hanne Haahr
    Tim Heise
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2020, 59 : 155 - 172
  • [27] Pharmacokinetic Properties of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Administered in Different Subcutaneous Injection Regions
    Hoevelmann, Ulrike
    Heise, Tim
    Nosek, Leszek
    Sassenfeld, Bettina
    Thomsen, Karen Margrete Due
    Haahr, Hanne
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2017, 37 (05) : 503 - 509
  • [28] Pharmacokinetic Properties of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Administered in Different Subcutaneous Injection Regions
    Ulrike Hövelmann
    Tim Heise
    Leszek Nosek
    Bettina Sassenfeld
    Karen Margrete Due Thomsen
    Hanne Haahr
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2017, 37 : 503 - 509
  • [29] Efficacy and safety of fast-acting insulin aspart in adults with type 2 diabetes with different insulin requirements
    Sesti, G.
    Lane, W.
    Ekelund, M.
    Thorisdottir, O.
    Jodar, E.
    Oviedo, A.
    Rathor, N.
    Senior, P.
    Franek, E.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2020, 63 (SUPPL 1) : S330 - S330
  • [30] Performance of Fast-Acting Aspart Insulin as Compared to Aspart Insulin in Insulin Pump for Managing Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis
    Dutta, Deep
    Mohindra, Ritin
    Mahajan, Kunal
    Sharma, Meha
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2023, 47 (01) : 72 - 81