Global soil consumption of atmospheric carbon monoxide: an analysis using a process-based biogeochemistry model

被引:26
|
作者
Liu, Licheng [1 ]
Zhuang, Qianlai [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Qing [1 ,3 ]
Liu, Shaoqing [1 ,4 ]
van Asperen, Hella [5 ]
Pihlatie, Mari [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth, Atmospher, Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Agron, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Climate Sci Dept, Climate & Ecosyst Sci Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Earth Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Univ Bremen, Inst Environm Phys, Otto Hahn Allee 1, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
[6] Univ Helsinki, Dept Phys, POB 48, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[7] Dept Forest Sci, POB 27, Helsinki 00014, Finland
关键词
TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS; NORTHERN-HEMISPHERE; METHANE FLUXES; CO FLUXES; FOREST; CHEMISTRY; EMISSIONS; CH4; HYDROGEN; DIOXIDE;
D O I
10.5194/acp-18-7913-2018
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon monoxide (CO) plays an important role in controlling the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere by reacting with OH radicals that affect atmospheric methane (CH4) dynamics. We develop a process-based biogeochemistry model to quantify the CO exchange between soils and the atmosphere with a 5 min internal time step at the global scale. The model is parameterized using the CO flux data from the field and laboratory experiments for 11 representative ecosystem types. The model is then extrapolated to global terrestrial ecosystems using monthly climate forcing data. Global soil gross consumption, gross production, and net flux of the atmospheric CO are estimated to be from -197 to -180, 34 to 36, and -163 to -145 TgCOyr(-1) (1 Tg = 10(12) g), respectively, when the model is driven with satellite-based atmospheric CO concentration data during 2000-2013. Tropical evergreen forest, savanna and deciduous forest areas are the largest sinks at 123 TgCOyr(-1). The soil CO gross consumption is sensitive to air temperature and atmospheric CO concentration, while the gross production is sensitive to soil organic carbon (SOC) stock and air temperature. By assuming that the spatially distributed atmospheric CO concentrations (similar to 128 ppbv) are not changing over time, the global mean CO net deposition velocity is estimated to be 0.16-0.19mms 1 during the 20th century. Under the future climate scenarios, the CO deposition velocity will increase at a rate of 0.0002-0.0013 mms 1 r(-1) during 2014-2100, reaching 0.20-0.30 mm s(-1) by the end of the 21st century, primarily due to the increasing temperature. Areas near the Equator, the eastern US, Europe and eastern Asia will be the largest sinks due to optimum soil moisture and high temperature. The annual global soil net flux of atmospheric CO is primarily controlled by air temperature, soil temperature, SOC and atmospheric CO concentrations, while its monthly variation is mainly determined by air temperature, precipitation, soil temperature and soil moisture.
引用
收藏
页码:7913 / 7931
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Global NO and HONO emissions of biological soil crusts estimated by a process-based non-vascular vegetation model
    Porada, Philipp
    Tamm, Alexandra
    Raggio, Jose
    Cheng, Yafang
    Kleidon, Axel
    Poeschl, Ulrich
    Weber, Bettina
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2019, 16 (09) : 2003 - 2031
  • [42] A process-based evaluation of the Intermediate Complexity Atmospheric Research Model (ICAR) 1.0.1
    Horak, Johannes
    Hofer, Marlis
    Gutmann, Ethan
    Gohm, Alexander
    Rotach, Mathias W.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 14 (03) : 1657 - 1680
  • [43] Divergent controls of soil organic carbon between observations and process-based models
    Katerina Georgiou
    Avni Malhotra
    William R. Wieder
    Jacqueline H. Ennis
    Melannie D. Hartman
    Benjamin N. Sulman
    Asmeret Asefaw Berhe
    A. Stuart Grandy
    Emily Kyker-Snowman
    Kate Lajtha
    Jessica A. M. Moore
    Derek Pierson
    Robert B. Jackson
    Biogeochemistry, 2021, 156 : 5 - 17
  • [44] Equilibrium responses of soil carbon to climate change: Empirical and process-based estimates
    McGuire, AD
    Melillo, JM
    Kicklighter, DW
    Joyce, LA
    JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 1995, 22 (4-5) : 785 - 796
  • [45] Spatial and process-based modeling of soil inorganic carbon storage in an arid piedmont
    Hirmas, Daniel R.
    Amrhein, Christopher
    Graham, Robert C.
    GEODERMA, 2010, 154 (3-4) : 486 - 494
  • [46] Divergent controls of soil organic carbon between observations and process-based models
    Georgiou, Katerina
    Malhotra, Avni
    Wieder, William R.
    Ennis, Jacqueline H.
    Hartman, Melannie D.
    Sulman, Benjamin N.
    Berhe, Asmeret Asefaw
    Grandy, A. Stuart
    Kyker-Snowman, Emily
    Lajtha, Kate
    Moore, Jessica A. M.
    Pierson, Derek
    Jackson, Robert B.
    BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 156 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [47] Global peatland area and carbon dynamics from the Last Glacial Maximum to the present - a process-based model investigation
    Mueller, Jurek
    Joos, Fortunat
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2020, 17 (21) : 5285 - 5308
  • [48] Performance Analysis of a Process-based Stand Growth Model Using Monte Carlo Techniques
    Makela, Annikki
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1988, 3 (1-4) : 315 - 331
  • [49] Parameterization and sensitivity analysis of a process-based terrestrial ecosystem model using adjoint method
    Zhu, Qing
    Zhuang, Qianlai
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS, 2014, 6 (02) : 315 - 331
  • [50] Global Validation of a Process-Based Model on Vegetation Gross Primary Production Using Eddy Covariance Observations
    Liu, Dan
    Cai, Wenwen
    Xia, Jiangzhou
    Dong, Wenjie
    Zhou, Guangsheng
    Chen, Yang
    Zhang, Haicheng
    Yuan, Wenping
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):