Comparison of decision tree based ensemble methods for prediction of photovoltaic maximum current

被引:17
|
作者
Omer, Zahi M. [1 ]
Shareef, Hussain [1 ]
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates Univ, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Fac Engn, Al Ain 15551, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Bootstrap aggregating; Ensemble machine learning; Gradient boosting; Hyperparameters tuning; photovoltaics; PV MODULES; MODEL PARAMETERS; SEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100333
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The intermittent nature of the output power of photovoltaic (PV) systems, in addition to the fast-varying solar irradiance, has prompted the development of fast, accurate, and reliable forecasting techniques. This paper presents a comparative study of five ensemble machine learning methods based on bootstrap aggregating and gradient boosting for PV applications, namely AdaBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost, Random Forest, and CatBoost. A dataset of fast-varying environmental conditions was collected, and the terminal current of the experimental setup was augmented by applying a mathematical model, along with an evolutionary algorithm to extract the parasitic resistances found in the Single Diode Model (SDM) to accommodate for the aging effect. The mathematical model was evaluated for several irradiance and temperature levels against manufacturer Standard Test Conditions (STC), and then variations of environmental conditions were adjusted based on the manufacturer datasheet. CatBoost showed the lowest overall absolute error distribution (with respect to the mean and standard deviation) of all methods, and the best performance in terms of the absolute error (0.25%) and its standard deviation (0.85%) relative to the mathematical model. The AdaBoost method had the highest absolute error (34.5%) and a standard deviation of (15.8%). After hyperparameters tuning, CatBoost still outperformed other methods and showed consistency of high accuracy above 99% in performance with respect to a testing dataset, in addition, to having the largest area under the curve using the trapezoidal rule. Therefore, the CatBoost prediction method is expected to be an effective technique for maximum power point tracking schemes under fast-varying environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tree-based ensemble methods for predicting PV power generation and their comparison with support vector regression
    Ahmad, Muhammad Waseem
    Mourshed, Monjur
    Rezgui, Yacine
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 164 : 465 - 474
  • [42] A Taxi Gap Prediction Method via Double Ensemble Gradient Boosting Decision Tree
    Zhang, Xiao
    Wang, Xiaorong
    Chen, Wei
    Tao, Jie
    Huang, Weijing
    Wang, Tengjiao
    [J]. 2017 IEEE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA SECURITY ON CLOUD (BIGDATASECURITY, IEEE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGH PERFORMANCE AND SMART COMPUTING, (HPSC) AND 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT DATA AND SECURITY (IDS), 2017, : 255 - 260
  • [43] Tree-based ensemble methods and their applications in analytical chemistry
    Cao, Dong-Sheng
    Xu, Qing-Song
    Zhang, Liang-Xiao
    Huang, Jian-Hua
    Liang, Yi-Zeng
    [J]. TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 40 : 158 - 167
  • [44] Comparison of Decision Tree Classification Methods and Gradient Boosted Trees
    Dikananda, Arif Rinaldi
    Jumini, Sri
    Tarihoran, Nafan
    Christinawati, Santy
    Trimastuti, Wahyu
    Rahim, Robbi
    [J]. TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2022, 11 (01): : 316 - 322
  • [45] Proposing a classifier ensemble framework based on classifier selection and decision tree
    Parvin, Hamid
    MirnabiBaboli, Miresmaeil
    Alinejad-Rokny, Hamid
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 37 : 34 - 42
  • [46] Agricultural Data Classification Based on Rough Set and Decision Tree Ensemble
    Shi, Lei
    Ma, Xinming
    Duan, Qiguo
    Weng, Mei
    Qiao, Hongbo
    [J]. SENSOR LETTERS, 2012, 10 (1-2) : 271 - 278
  • [47] Recognition of hybrid PQ disturbances based on a chaos ensemble decision tree
    Li, Zuming
    Lü, Ganyun
    Chen, Nuo
    Pei, Zheyuan
    Ding, Yuhao
    Gong, Yu
    [J]. Dianli Xitong Baohu yu Kongzhi/Power System Protection and Control, 2021, 49 (21): : 18 - 27
  • [48] Comparison of Ensemble Decision Tree Methods for On-line Identification of Power System Dynamic Signature Considering Availability of PMU Measurements
    Guo, Tingyan
    Papadopoulos, P.
    Mohammed, P.
    Milanovic, J. V.
    [J]. 2015 IEEE EINDHOVEN POWERTECH, 2015,
  • [49] A Power Grid Fault Diagnosis Method based on Ensemble Decision Tree
    Wang, Ding
    Li, Guang
    Tang, Weining
    Tian, Chunguang
    Zhou, Hongwei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATION ENGINEERING (CSAE), 2017, 190 : 367 - 372
  • [50] An Ensemble-based Decision Tree Approach for Educational Data Mining
    Abdar, Moloud
    Zomorodi-Moghadam, Mariam
    Zhou, Xujuan
    [J]. 2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BEHAVIORAL, ECONOMIC, AND SOCIO-CULTURAL COMPUTING (BESC), 2018, : 126 - 129