Comparison of decision tree based ensemble methods for prediction of photovoltaic maximum current

被引:17
|
作者
Omer, Zahi M. [1 ]
Shareef, Hussain [1 ]
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates Univ, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Fac Engn, Al Ain 15551, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Bootstrap aggregating; Ensemble machine learning; Gradient boosting; Hyperparameters tuning; photovoltaics; PV MODULES; MODEL PARAMETERS; SEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100333
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The intermittent nature of the output power of photovoltaic (PV) systems, in addition to the fast-varying solar irradiance, has prompted the development of fast, accurate, and reliable forecasting techniques. This paper presents a comparative study of five ensemble machine learning methods based on bootstrap aggregating and gradient boosting for PV applications, namely AdaBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost, Random Forest, and CatBoost. A dataset of fast-varying environmental conditions was collected, and the terminal current of the experimental setup was augmented by applying a mathematical model, along with an evolutionary algorithm to extract the parasitic resistances found in the Single Diode Model (SDM) to accommodate for the aging effect. The mathematical model was evaluated for several irradiance and temperature levels against manufacturer Standard Test Conditions (STC), and then variations of environmental conditions were adjusted based on the manufacturer datasheet. CatBoost showed the lowest overall absolute error distribution (with respect to the mean and standard deviation) of all methods, and the best performance in terms of the absolute error (0.25%) and its standard deviation (0.85%) relative to the mathematical model. The AdaBoost method had the highest absolute error (34.5%) and a standard deviation of (15.8%). After hyperparameters tuning, CatBoost still outperformed other methods and showed consistency of high accuracy above 99% in performance with respect to a testing dataset, in addition, to having the largest area under the curve using the trapezoidal rule. Therefore, the CatBoost prediction method is expected to be an effective technique for maximum power point tracking schemes under fast-varying environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Decision tree based duration prediction in Mandarin
    Guo, Q
    Katae, N
    [J]. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering (IEEE NLP-KE'05), 2005, : 209 - 212
  • [22] Decision-based evasion attacks on tree ensemble classifiers
    Fuyong Zhang
    Yi Wang
    Shigang Liu
    Hua Wang
    [J]. World Wide Web, 2020, 23 : 2957 - 2977
  • [23] Cardiovascular Disease Prediction based on Decision Tree
    Karthigeyan, S.
    Bhuvaneswari, R.
    [J]. 2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION AND APPLIED INFORMATICS, ACCAI 2024, 2024,
  • [24] Fault mode prediction based on decision tree
    Jiarula, Yasenjiang
    Gao, Jianmin
    Gao, Zhiyong
    Jiang, Hongquan
    Wang, Rongxi
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE ADVANCED INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, COMMUNICATES, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (IMCEC 2016), 2016, : 1729 - 1733
  • [25] An ensemble learning model based on differentially private decision tree
    Niu, Xufeng
    Ma, Wenping
    [J]. COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2023, 9 (05) : 5267 - 5280
  • [26] Decision-based evasion attacks on tree ensemble classifiers
    Zhang, Fuyong
    Wang, Yi
    Liu, Shigang
    Wang, Hua
    [J]. WORLD WIDE WEB-INTERNET AND WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2020, 23 (05): : 2957 - 2977
  • [27] An ensemble learning model based on differentially private decision tree
    Xufeng Niu
    Wenping Ma
    [J]. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2023, 9 : 5267 - 5280
  • [28] Comparison of Kernel and Decision Tree-Based Algorithms for Prediction of MicroRNAs Associated with Cancer
    Kothandan, Ram
    Biswas, Sumit
    [J]. CURRENT BIOINFORMATICS, 2016, 11 (01) : 143 - 151
  • [29] Comparison of tree-based ensemble models for regression
    Park, Sangho
    Kim, Chanmin
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS FOR STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS AND METHODS, 2022, 29 (05) : 561 - 590
  • [30] Comparison of machine learning methods for photovoltaic power forecasting based on numerical weather prediction
    Markovics, David
    Mayer, Martin Janos
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 161