Comparison of decision tree based ensemble methods for prediction of photovoltaic maximum current

被引:17
|
作者
Omer, Zahi M. [1 ]
Shareef, Hussain [1 ]
机构
[1] United Arab Emirates Univ, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Fac Engn, Al Ain 15551, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Bootstrap aggregating; Ensemble machine learning; Gradient boosting; Hyperparameters tuning; photovoltaics; PV MODULES; MODEL PARAMETERS; SEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100333
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The intermittent nature of the output power of photovoltaic (PV) systems, in addition to the fast-varying solar irradiance, has prompted the development of fast, accurate, and reliable forecasting techniques. This paper presents a comparative study of five ensemble machine learning methods based on bootstrap aggregating and gradient boosting for PV applications, namely AdaBoost, LightGBM, XGBoost, Random Forest, and CatBoost. A dataset of fast-varying environmental conditions was collected, and the terminal current of the experimental setup was augmented by applying a mathematical model, along with an evolutionary algorithm to extract the parasitic resistances found in the Single Diode Model (SDM) to accommodate for the aging effect. The mathematical model was evaluated for several irradiance and temperature levels against manufacturer Standard Test Conditions (STC), and then variations of environmental conditions were adjusted based on the manufacturer datasheet. CatBoost showed the lowest overall absolute error distribution (with respect to the mean and standard deviation) of all methods, and the best performance in terms of the absolute error (0.25%) and its standard deviation (0.85%) relative to the mathematical model. The AdaBoost method had the highest absolute error (34.5%) and a standard deviation of (15.8%). After hyperparameters tuning, CatBoost still outperformed other methods and showed consistency of high accuracy above 99% in performance with respect to a testing dataset, in addition, to having the largest area under the curve using the trapezoidal rule. Therefore, the CatBoost prediction method is expected to be an effective technique for maximum power point tracking schemes under fast-varying environmental conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Automatic feature subset selection for decision tree-based ensemble methods in the prediction of bioactivity
    Cao, Dong-Sheng
    Xu, Qing-Song
    Liang, Yi-Zeng
    Chen, Xian
    Li, Hong-Dong
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [2] Adaptive Boosting and Bootstrapped Aggregation based Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Photovoltaic Systems Output Current Prediction
    Omer, Zahi M.
    Shareef, Hussain
    [J]. 2019 29TH AUSTRALASIAN UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (AUPEC), 2019,
  • [3] A comparison of decision tree ensemble creation techniques
    Banfield, Robert E.
    Hall, Lawrence O.
    Bowyer, Kevin W.
    Kegelmeyer, W. P.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 29 (01) : 173 - 180
  • [4] Multidimensional Feature Selection and Interaction Mining with Decision Tree Based Ensemble Methods
    Krol, Lukasz
    Polanska, Joanna
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY & BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 616 : 118 - 125
  • [5] Proteomic mass spectra classification using decision tree based ensemble methods
    Geurts, P
    Fillet, M
    de Seny, D
    Meuwis, MA
    Malaise, M
    Merville, MP
    Wehenkel, L
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (14) : 3138 - 3145
  • [6] Comparison of Tree Based Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Prediction of Rate Constant of Diels-Alder Reaction
    Dev, Vikrant A.
    Datta, Shounak
    Chemmangattuvalappil, Nishanth G.
    Eden, Mario R.
    [J]. 27TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT A, 2017, 40A : 997 - 1002
  • [7] Landslide Susceptibility Prediction based on Decision Tree and Feature Selection Methods
    Nirbhav
    Malik, Anand
    Maheshwar
    Jan, Tony
    Prasad, Mukesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 51 (04) : 771 - 786
  • [8] Landslide Susceptibility Prediction based on Decision Tree and Feature Selection Methods
    Anand Nirbhav
    Tony Malik
    Mukesh Maheshwar
    [J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2023, 51 : 771 - 786
  • [9] Prediction of thyroid disease using decision tree ensemble method
    Dhyan Chandra Yadav
    Saurabh Pal
    [J]. Human-Intelligent Systems Integration, 2020, 2 (1-4) : 89 - 95
  • [10] Comparing ensemble learning methods based on decision tree classifiers for protein fold recognition
    Bardsiri, Mahshid Khatibi
    Eftekhari, Mahdi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DATA MINING AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2014, 9 (01) : 89 - 105