Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US

被引:32
|
作者
Challa, Rohan [1 ]
Kamath, Dipti [2 ]
Anctil, Annick [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Mech Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Electric vehicle; Internal combustion engine vehicle; Greenhouse gas emissions; Life cycle assessment; Well-to-wheel emissions; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; MIX; EFFICIENCY; TRANSPORT; HYDROGEN; ENGINE; HYBRID;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Concise abstract: Electric vehicles (EVs) can reduce transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, given the planned electric grid decarbonization. Regulations can also reduce internal combustion engine vehicle's (ICEVs) emissions by mandating increased fuel economies or ethanol-gasoline mixes. Factors such as fuel economy, electricity grid mix, vehicle choice, and temperature affect EV GHG emissions relative to ICEVs, and successfully decarbonizing the transportation sector depends on understanding their combined effects. We use life-cycle assessment to compare the EV and ICEV well-to-wheel GHG emissions in the United States and four other states from 2018 to 2030. We found lower emissions for EVs than ICEVs in most conditions considered. In New York state, where natural gas power plants replace nuclear energy, GHG emissions of electricity generation increase over time after 2020. Future ICEVs can have comparable emissions to EVs due to fuel economy increase. Therefore, EV and ICEV can together lower transportation GHG emissions at a faster pace.Extended abstract: Transportation-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions can be reduced by (a) increasing the share of electric vehicles (EVs) and (b) reducing GHG emissions of internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs) by mandating increased fuel economies or ethanol-gasoline mixes. Factors, such as fuel economy, electricity grid mix, vehicle choice, and temperature affect EVs' relative GHG emissions compared to ICEVs, and understanding their combined effect is necessary for a successful decarbonization of the transportation sector. We used life-cycle assessment to evaluate the simultaneous effect of the above-mentioned factors on the well-to-wheel GHG emissions of EVs and ICEVs from 2018 to 2030. The analysis was performed for the United States (US) average and state-level for Arizona, California, New York, and Oregon.Our results showed lower GHG emissions for EVs than ICEVs for most conditions considered. GHG emissions are expected to decrease in the US on average by 5% for EVs and 27% for ICEVs in 2030 compared to 2018. In 2030, the ICEV well-to-wheel GHG emissions were comparable to those of the EVs in the US average and Arizona. EVs perform best in California and Oregon throughout the considered period. In regions, such as New York, EVs driven 2021 and after will have higher GHG emissions than ICEVs, as natural gas power plants are replacing nuclear energy. While EV GHG emissions decrease over time due to grid decarbonization, future ICEVs can lower the GHG emissions, especially for larger vehicles, where EVs might not be the best option. Therefore, EV and ICEV can together lower transportation GHG emissions at a faster pace.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Well-to-wheel analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption for electric vehicles: A comparative study in Oceania
    Sheng, Mingyue Selena
    Sreenivasan, Ajith Viswanath
    Sharp, Basil
    Du, Bo
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 158
  • [2] Comparative Well-to-Wheel Emissions Assessment of Internal Combustion Engine and Battery Electric Vehicles
    Athanasopoulou, L.
    Bikas, H.
    Stavropoulos, P.
    [J]. 6TH CIRP GLOBAL WEB CONFERENCE - ENVISAGING THE FUTURE MANUFACTURING, DESIGN, TECHNOLOGIES AND SYSTEMS IN INNOVATION ERA (CIRPE 2018), 2018, 78 : 25 - 30
  • [3] Well-to-wheel analysis of greenhouse gas emissions for electric vehicles based on electricity generation mix: A global perspective
    Woo, JongRoul
    Choi, Hyunhong
    Ahn, Joongha
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 51 : 340 - 350
  • [4] Well-to-wheel climate performance of gas and electric vehicles in Europe
    Gustafsson, Marcus
    Svensson, Niclas
    Eklund, Mats
    Moller, Bjorn Fredriksson
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 97
  • [5] Well-to-wheel costs, primary energy demand, and greenhouse gas emissions for the production and operation of conventional and alternative vehicles
    Yazdanie, Mashael
    Noembrini, Fabrizio
    Heinen, Steve
    Espinel, Augusto
    Boulouchos, Konstantinos
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 48 : 63 - 84
  • [6] Dynamic analysis of well-to-wheel electric and hydrogen vehicles greenhouse gas emissions: Focusing on consumer preferences and power mix changes in South Korea
    Kim, Imjung
    Kim, Junghun
    Lee, Jongsu
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 260
  • [7] Greenhouse gas emissions embedded in US-China fuel ethanol trade: A comparative well-to-wheel estimate
    Wang, Yu
    Cheng, Ming-Hsun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 183 : 653 - 661
  • [8] Hydrogen storage technology options for fuel cell vehicles: Well-to-wheel costs, energy efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions
    Paster, M. D.
    Ahluwalia, R. K.
    Berry, G.
    Elgowainy, A.
    Lasher, S.
    McKenney, K.
    Gardiner, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (22) : 14534 - 14551
  • [9] Well-to-Wheel analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for synthesized vehicle fuels
    Shen, Wei
    Zhang, Aling
    Han, Weijian
    [J]. Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University, 2007, 47 (03): : 441 - 444
  • [10] Well-to-Wheel emissions of electric vehicles in Türkiye and emission mitigation by renewable penetration
    Sahin, Habip
    Esen, Hikmet
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 235