Deferoxamine Administration Delivers Translational Optimization of Distraction Osteogenesis in the Irradiated Mandible

被引:26
|
作者
Felice, Peter A.
Ahsan, Salman
Donneys, Alexis
Deshpande, Sagar S.
Nelson, Noah S.
Buchman, Steven R.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Craniofacial Res Lab, Plast Surg Sect, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ S Carolina, Dept Surg, Sch Med, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BONE REGENERATION; FRACTURE; TISSUE; IRON; RADIATION; INVITRO; GROWTH; INJURY; REPAIR; CELLS;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829fe548
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The authors' laboratory has previously demonstrated that deferoxamine promotes angiogenesis and bone repair in the setting of radiation therapy coupled with distraction osteogenesis. However, clinically relevant effects of deferoxamine administration on union rate and micro-computed tomographic and biomechanical parameters are unknown. The authors posit that administration of deferoxamine will increase union rate, mineralization, and strength of the regenerate in an irradiated distraction osteogenesis model. Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into three groups: distraction osteogenesis-control, distraction osteogenesis-radiation therapy, and distraction osteogenesis-radiation therapy-deferoxamine. All animals underwent an osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis across a 5.1-mm distraction gap. Irradiated animals received 35-Gy human-equivalent radiation therapy 2 weeks before surgery, and deferoxamine was injected postoperatively in the regenerate site of treatment animals. Animals were killed on postoperative day 40, and mandibles were harvested to determine rates of bony union and micro-computed tomographic and biomechanical parameters. Results: Compared with irradiated mandibles, deferoxamine-treated mandibles exhibited a higher union rate (11 percent versus 92 percent, respectively). Across micro-computed tomographic and biomechanical parameters, significant diminutions were observed with administration of radiation therapy, whereas deferoxamine therapy resulted in significant restoration to levels of controls, with select metrics exhibiting significant increases even beyond controls. Conclusions: The authors' data confirm that deferoxamine restores clinically relevant metrics of bony union and micro-computed tomographic and biomechanical parameters in a model of irradiated distraction osteogenesis in the murine mandible. Their findings support a potential use for deferoxamine in treatment protocols to allow predictable and reliable use of distraction osteogenesis as a viable reconstructive option in patients with head and neck cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:542E / 548E
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Curvilinear intraoral distraction osteogenesis: Experience in the canine mandible
    Staffenberg, DA
    Williams, JK
    Kumar, AV
    Losken, A
    Wood, RJ
    [J]. CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 7, 1997, : 343 - 345
  • [42] Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: Histomorphometric evaluation of bone
    Glowacki, J
    Shusterman, EM
    Troulis, M
    Holmes, R
    Perrott, D
    Kaban, LB
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 113 (02) : 566 - 573
  • [43] Transport distraction osteogenesis following marginal resection of the mandible
    Kondoh, T
    Hamada, Y
    Kamei, K
    Seto, K
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 31 (06) : 675 - 676
  • [44] Intraoral widening and lengthening of the mandible in baboons by distraction osteogenesis
    Bell, WH
    Gonzalez, M
    Samchukov, ML
    Guerrero, CA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 57 (05) : 548 - 562
  • [45] The effects of magnitude and frequency of distraction forces on tissue regeneration in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible
    Kessler, PA
    Merten, HA
    Neukam, FW
    Wiltfang, J
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 109 (01) : 171 - 180
  • [46] Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: evaluation of callus distraction by B-scan ultrasonography
    Nocini, PF
    Albanese, M
    Wangerin, K
    Fior, A
    Trevisiol, L
    Kretschmer, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 30 (05) : 286 - 291
  • [47] Use of a plate-guided distraction device for transport distraction osteogenesis of the mandible
    Herford, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 62 (04) : 412 - 420
  • [48] Is Distraction Osteogenesis of the Irradiated Craniofacial Skeleton Contraindicated?
    Momeni, Arash
    Januszyk, Michael
    Wan, Derrick C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (05) : 1236 - 1241
  • [49] Deferoxamine Enhances the Vascular Response of Bone Regeneration in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis
    Donneys, Alexis
    Farberg, Aaron S.
    Tchanque-Fossuo, Catherine N.
    Deshpande, Sagar S.
    Buchman, Steven R.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 129 (04) : 850 - 856
  • [50] Changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible
    Thurmüller, P
    Troulis, MJ
    Rosenberg, A
    Kaban, LB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (11) : 1327 - 1333