The effects of magnitude and frequency of distraction forces on tissue regeneration in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible

被引:44
|
作者
Kessler, PA
Merten, HA
Neukam, FW
Wiltfang, J
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-200201000-00027
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Callus distraction has become an accepted treatment procedure to lengthen hypoplastic mandibles in humans. For this purpose, extraoral and intraoral devices have been applied successfully. The effects of the distraction vector, distractor stability, and rate and frequency of callus distraction on the regenerating tissues have been examined in various studies. In an experimental animal trial on pigs (n = 12), a newly developed microhydraulic osteodistractor was tested. The animals were evenly assigned to two groups to perform a continuous and noncontinuous osteodistraction of the mandible. Initially, the forces necessary to distract the pig mandibles were recorded from a noncontinuous distraction procedure; the results were then used to perform continuous bone distraction. Besides testing the new distractor, the study proved that in continuous osteodistraction, intramembranous bone regeneration occurred, whereas in noncontinuous osteodistraction the bone regeneration process followed a chondroid ossification. In continuous osteodistraction, the bone regeneration proceeded at a higher speed with the lower distraction forces compared with noncontinuous distraction, thereby reducing the consolidation period. Clinical and microscopical results are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 180
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of distraction forces and frequency of distraction on bony regeneration
    Kessler, P
    Neukam, FW
    Wiltfang, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 43 (05): : 392 - 398
  • [2] Effects of Piezoelectric Surgery on Bone Regeneration Following Distraction Osteogenesis of Mandible
    Tosun, Emre
    Bilgic, Meric
    Yildirim, Benay
    Tuz, Hakan Hifzi
    Ozer, Taha
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 28 (01) : 74 - 78
  • [3] The effect of magnitude and frequency of interfragmentary strain on the tissue response to distraction osteogenesis
    Meyer, U
    Meyer, T
    Wiesmann, HP
    Stratmann, U
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 57 (11) : 1331 - 1339
  • [4] Distraction osteogenesis to widen the mandible
    Bell, WH
    Harper, RP
    Gonzalez, M
    Cherkashin, AM
    Samchukov, ML
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1997, 35 (01): : 11 - 19
  • [5] Distraction Osteogenesis: Mandible and Maxilla
    Dibbs, Rami P.
    Ferry, Andrew M.
    Sarrami, Shayan M.
    Abu-Ghname, Amjed
    Dempsey, Robert F.
    Buchanan, Edward P.
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 37 (06) : 751 - 758
  • [6] The effect of magnitude and frequency of interfragmentary strain on the tissue response to distraction osteogenesis - Discussion
    Walker, DA
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1999, 57 (11) : 1340 - 1341
  • [7] Long-Term Effects of Distraction Osteogenesis of the Mandible
    Peacock, Zachary S.
    Salcines, Alfonso
    Troulis, Maria J.
    Kaban, Leonard B.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (07) : 1512 - 1523
  • [8] Basic cell and tissue reactions in distraction osteogenesis of the rabbit mandible
    Meyer, U
    Kruse-Lösler, B
    Meyer, T
    Joos, U
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, 1999, : 17 - 22
  • [9] Posterior mandible lengthening by distraction osteogenesis
    Soares, M
    Guerra, F
    Duarte, P
    Correa, C
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2003, : 81 - 85
  • [10] A study of distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in rabbits
    Yu, SJ
    Kim, JW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 (05) : 1318 - 1318