The effects of magnitude and frequency of distraction forces on tissue regeneration in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible

被引:44
|
作者
Kessler, PA
Merten, HA
Neukam, FW
Wiltfang, J
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-200201000-00027
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Callus distraction has become an accepted treatment procedure to lengthen hypoplastic mandibles in humans. For this purpose, extraoral and intraoral devices have been applied successfully. The effects of the distraction vector, distractor stability, and rate and frequency of callus distraction on the regenerating tissues have been examined in various studies. In an experimental animal trial on pigs (n = 12), a newly developed microhydraulic osteodistractor was tested. The animals were evenly assigned to two groups to perform a continuous and noncontinuous osteodistraction of the mandible. Initially, the forces necessary to distract the pig mandibles were recorded from a noncontinuous distraction procedure; the results were then used to perform continuous bone distraction. Besides testing the new distractor, the study proved that in continuous osteodistraction, intramembranous bone regeneration occurred, whereas in noncontinuous osteodistraction the bone regeneration process followed a chondroid ossification. In continuous osteodistraction, the bone regeneration proceeded at a higher speed with the lower distraction forces compared with noncontinuous distraction, thereby reducing the consolidation period. Clinical and microscopical results are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 180
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Complications in alveolar distraction osteogenesis of the atrophic mandible
    Perdijk, F. B. T.
    Meijer, G. J.
    van Strijen, P. J.
    Koole, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 36 (10) : 916 - 921
  • [22] Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible for airway obstruction in children
    Sidman, JD
    Sampson, D
    Templeton, B
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2001, 111 (07): : 1137 - 1146
  • [23] Distraction osteogenesis of the dentoalveolar anterior segment in the mandible
    Pedersen, T. K.
    Norholt, S. E.
    Melsen, B.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2006, : 55 - +
  • [24] Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in the previously irradiated patient
    Holmes, SB
    Lloyd, T
    Coghlan, KM
    Newman, L
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (03) : 305 - 309
  • [25] Nicotine impairs distraction osteogenesis in the rat mandible
    Glowacki, J.
    Schulten, A. J. M.
    Perrott, D.
    Kaban, L. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 37 (02) : 156 - 161
  • [26] Is short distraction osteogenesis of the mandible on adults recommendable?
    Bschorer, R.
    Siegmund, B.
    Goppold, K.
    XX CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF CRANIO-MAXILLO-FACIAL-SURGERY, 2010, : 95 - 99
  • [27] Guided tissue regeneration enhances osteogenesis in a rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis model
    Fang, TD
    Nacamuli, R
    Song, H
    Fong, K
    Warren, S
    Longaker, MT
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (03) : S49 - S49
  • [28] Intraoral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia
    Rachmiel, A
    Manor, R
    Peled, M
    Laufer, D
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2001, 59 (07) : 728 - 733
  • [29] LENGTHENING OF THE MANDIBLE BY DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS - REPORT OF CASES
    RACHMIEL, A
    LEVY, M
    LAUFER, D
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 53 (07) : 838 - 846
  • [30] Relapse in the sheep mandible following distraction osteogenesis
    McTavish, J
    Marucci, D
    Walsh, WR
    Pool, MD
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES, 1999, : 273 - 277