The effects of magnitude and frequency of distraction forces on tissue regeneration in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible

被引:44
|
作者
Kessler, PA
Merten, HA
Neukam, FW
Wiltfang, J
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Gottingen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-200201000-00027
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Callus distraction has become an accepted treatment procedure to lengthen hypoplastic mandibles in humans. For this purpose, extraoral and intraoral devices have been applied successfully. The effects of the distraction vector, distractor stability, and rate and frequency of callus distraction on the regenerating tissues have been examined in various studies. In an experimental animal trial on pigs (n = 12), a newly developed microhydraulic osteodistractor was tested. The animals were evenly assigned to two groups to perform a continuous and noncontinuous osteodistraction of the mandible. Initially, the forces necessary to distract the pig mandibles were recorded from a noncontinuous distraction procedure; the results were then used to perform continuous bone distraction. Besides testing the new distractor, the study proved that in continuous osteodistraction, intramembranous bone regeneration occurred, whereas in noncontinuous osteodistraction the bone regeneration process followed a chondroid ossification. In continuous osteodistraction, the bone regeneration proceeded at a higher speed with the lower distraction forces compared with noncontinuous distraction, thereby reducing the consolidation period. Clinical and microscopical results are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 180
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Controlled bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis
    Habal, MB
    CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY 9, 2001, : 161 - 162
  • [42] Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis
    Lisa R. Amir
    Vincent Everts
    Antonius L.J.J. Bronckers
    Odontology, 2009, 97 : 63 - 75
  • [43] Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis
    Amir, Lisa R.
    Everts, Vincent
    Bronckers, Antonius L. J. J.
    ODONTOLOGY, 2009, 97 (02) : 63 - 75
  • [44] Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Distraction Osteogenesis in Rat Mandible
    Ginini, Jiriys G.
    Maor, Gila
    Emodi, Omri
    Shilo, Dekel
    Gabet, Yankel
    Aizenbud, Dror
    Rachmiel, Adi
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (06) : 1501 - 1509
  • [45] Manipulation of callus after linear distraction: A "lifeboat" or an alternative to multivectorial distraction osteogenesis of the mandible?
    Kunz, C
    Hammer, B
    Prein, J
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2000, 105 (02) : 674 - 679
  • [46] Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: Evaluation of callus distraction using the B-scan ultrasonography
    Nocini, PF
    Wangerin, K
    Albanese, M
    D'Agostino, A
    Fior, A
    Sauckel, K
    3RD INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON CRANIAL AND FACIAL BONE DISTRACTION PROCESSES: 2001 DISTRACTION ODYSSEY, 2001, : 209 - 213
  • [47] SOFT TISSUE CHANGES WITH DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS OF MAXILLOFACIAL REGION WITH DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS OF MAXILLOFACIAL REGION
    Apaydin, Aysegul
    Yazdurdiyev, Byashmyrat
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, 2007, 41 (04) : 1 - 6
  • [48] Sagittal elongation of the mandible and nerve preservation by distraction osteogenesis
    Moses, JJ
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MAXILLOFACIAL AND CRANIOFACIAL DISTRACTION, 2003, : 129 - 131
  • [49] Distraction osteogenesis in Silver Russell syndrome to expand the mandible
    Kisnisci, RS
    Fowel, SD
    Epker, BN
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1999, 116 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [50] Effect of nicotine on distraction osteogenesis of the rat mandible.
    Schulten, M
    Kaban, LB
    Perrott, D
    Glowacki, J
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2002, 17 : S243 - S243