Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:82
|
作者
Orhurhu, Vwaire [1 ]
Orhurhu, Mariam Salisu [2 ]
Bhatia, Anuj [3 ,4 ]
Cohen, Steven P. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Hosp, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care Med, Neurol & Phys Med & Rehabil, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Phys Med & Rehabil, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2019年 / 129卷 / 01期
关键词
INTRAVENOUS KETAMINE; DOUBLE-BLIND; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; CLINICAL IMPORTANCE; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; CANCER PAIN; SENSITIZATION; FIBROMYALGIA; OUTCOMES; NEED;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000004185
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: IV ketamine is widely used to treat patients with chronic pain, yet the long-term impact remains uncertain. We synthesized evidence from randomized control trials to investigate the effectiveness of IV ketamine infusions for pain relief in chronic conditions and to determine whether any pain classifications or treatment regimens are associated with greater benefit. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar, as well as the website from inception through December 16, 2017 for randomized control trials comparing IV ketamine to placebo infusions for chronic pain that reported outcomes for >= 48 hours after the intervention. Three authors independently screened the studies, pooled the data, and appraised risk of bias. Random-effects model was used to calculate weighted mean differences for pain scores and secondary outcomes. Our primary outcome was the lowest recorded pain score >= 48 hours after cessation of treatment. Secondary outcomes included responder rate and adverse effects. RESULTS: Among 696 studies assessed for eligibility, 7 met inclusion criteria. All studies except one were at high risk of bias. These studies randomly assigned 211 patients with neuropathic (n = 2), mixed (n = 2), and nonneuropathic (nociplastic or nociceptive) (n = 3) pain. Three studies reported significant analgesic benefit favoring ketamine, with the meta-analysis revealing a small effect up to 2 weeks after the infusion (mean difference in pain scores, -1.83 points on a 0-10 numerical rating scale; 95% CI, -2.35 to -1.31 points; P < .0001). In the 3 studies that reported responder rates, the proportion with a positive outcome was greater in the ketamine than in the placebo group (51.3% vs 19.4%; relative risk, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.10-5.40; P = .029; I-2 = 0.0%). No differences were noted based on pain classification or condition. Compared to low-dose ketamine studies and investigations that evaluated non-complex regional pain syndrome conditions, a small but nonsignificant greater reduction in pain scores was found among studies that either utilized high-dose ketamine therapy (P = .213) or enrolled complex regional pain syndrome patients (P = .079). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that IV ketamine provides significant short-term analgesic benefit in patients with refractory chronic pain, with some evidence of a dose-response relationship. Larger, multicenter studies with longer follow-ups are needed to better select patients and determine the optimal treatment protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 254
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Telemedicine in Cancer Pain Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Buonanno, Pasquale
    Marra, Annachiara
    Iacovazzo, Carmine
    Franco, Massimo
    De Simone, Stefania
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (03) : 226 - 233
  • [22] Ketamine for chronic non-cancer pain: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Michelet, D.
    Brasher, C.
    Horlin, A-L
    Bellon, M.
    Julien-Marsollier, F.
    Vacher, T.
    Pontone, S.
    Dahmani, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 22 (04) : 632 - 646
  • [23] Whole Body Vibration Exercise for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Dong, Yulin
    Wang, Wu
    Zheng, Jiejiao
    Chen, Su
    Qiao, Jun
    Wang, Xueqiang
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 100 (11): : 2167 - 2178
  • [24] Palmitoylethanolamide in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lang-Illievich, Kordula
    Klivinyi, Christoph
    Lasser, Christian
    Brenna, Connor T. A.
    Szilagyi, Istvan S. S.
    Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [25] Efficacy of Dry Needling for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Carmen Lara-Palomo, Inmaculada
    Gil-Martinez, Esther
    Dolores Lopez-Fernandez, Maria
    Gonzalez Gonzalez, Laura Merce
    de los Angeles Querol-Zaldivar, Maria
    Maria Castro-Sanchez, Adelaida
    [J]. ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (08) : 110 - 120
  • [26] Effects of breathing exercises on chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jiang, Xiaoyu
    Sun, Wenyu
    Chen, Qiang
    Xu, Qiling
    Chen, Guoming
    Bi, Hongyan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 37 (01) : 13 - 23
  • [27] Are Positive Psychology Interventions Efficacious in Chronic Pain Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Braunwalder, Celine
    Muller, Rachel
    Glisic, Marija
    Fekete, Christine
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (01) : 122 - 136
  • [28] Efficacy of Auricular Acupressure for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Yang, Li-Hua
    Duan, Pei-Bei
    Hou, Qing-Mei
    Du, Shi-Zheng
    Sun, Jin-Fang
    Mei, Si-Juan
    Wang, Xiao-Qing
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 2017
  • [29] Benefits and safety of gabapentinoids in chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    Gilron, Ian
    Rajarathinam, Manikandan
    AlAmri, Rizq
    Kamath, Sriganesh
    Thabane, Lehana
    Devereaux, Philip J.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (08)
  • [30] Effect of Scraping Therapy on Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Xiao Qing
    Duan, Pei Bei
    Zheng, Man
    Yang, Li Hua
    Wang, A. Qin
    Zhang, Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 44 (03) : 255 - 270