Are Positive Psychology Interventions Efficacious in Chronic Pain Treatment? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:23
|
作者
Braunwalder, Celine [1 ,2 ]
Muller, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Glisic, Marija [1 ,3 ]
Fekete, Christine [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Parapleg Res, Guido A Zach Str 4, CH-6207 Nottwil, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lucerne, Dept Hlth Sci & Med, Luzern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bern, Inst Social & Prevent Med, Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Positive Psychology; Chronic Pain; Randomized Controlled Trials; Systematic Review; Meta-Analysis; PHYSICAL-DISABILITY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; FIBROMYALGIA; INDIVIDUALS; PREVALENCE; IMPACT; BACK;
D O I
10.1093/pm/pnab247
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective. Although positive psychology interventions (PPIs) are increasingly popular in chronic pain treatment their efficacy is still unclear. The objective is to summarize evidence on the effect of PPIs on pain, physical functioning, and emotional functioning in adults with chronic pain. Methods. Four electronic databases and additional references were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1990 and 2020. Findings from included studies were qualitatively and quantitatively synthesized, and study quality was assessed for risk of bias. A random effects meta-analysis model was applied for outcomes with more than four findings. Results. Of 16 included RCTs, almost half delivered PPIs as self-help online interventions, and half conducted guided face-to-face interventions which lasted mostly eight weeks. Results from meta-analysis showed beneficial effects of PPIs compared to the control group on pain intensity and emotional functioning (i.e., less depressive symptoms, pain catastrophizing, negative affect; more positive affect) post-intervention. At 3-month follow-up, beneficial effects were maintained for depressive symptoms and positive and negative affect, but not for pain catastrophizing. However, the evidence on the long-term efficacy of PPIs and the efficacy of PPIs on physical functioning remains limited. Conclusions. This review supports the notion that PPIs are beneficial to chronic pain treatment, although further, high quality research is needed to support this conclusion.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 136
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Efficacy of Multi-component Positive Psychology Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Tom Hendriks
    Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra
    Aabidien Hassankhan
    Joop de Jong
    Ernst Bohlmeijer
    [J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2020, 21 : 357 - 390
  • [2] The Efficacy of Multi-component Positive Psychology Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hendriks, Tom
    Schotanus-Dijkstra, Marijke
    Hassankhan, Aabidien
    De Jong, Joop
    Bohlmeijer, Ernst
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAPPINESS STUDIES, 2020, 21 (01) : 357 - 390
  • [3] REHABILITATION INTERVENTIONS FOR NEUROPATHIC PAIN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Backryd, Emmanuel
    Ghafouri, Nazdar
    Gerdle, Bjorn
    Dragioti, Elena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2024, 56
  • [4] Effects of scapular treatment on chronic neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Yin
    Yang, Chunlan
    Nie, Kailu
    Huang, Jiapeng
    Qu, Yun
    Wang, Tingting
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [5] Acupuncture Treatment for Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sung, Soo-Hyun
    Sung, Angela-Dong-Min
    Sung, Hyun-Kyung
    An, Tteul-E-Bom
    Kim, Kyeong Han
    Park, Jang-Kyung
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 2018
  • [6] Ketamine Infusions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Orhurhu, Vwaire
    Orhurhu, Mariam Salisu
    Bhatia, Anuj
    Cohen, Steven P.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2019, 129 (01): : 241 - 254
  • [7] Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Heidemarie Haller
    Romy Lauche
    Tobias Sundberg
    Gustav Dobos
    Holger Cramer
    [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [8] Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Haller, Heidemarie
    Lauche, Romy
    Sundberg, Tobias
    Dobos, Gustav
    Cramer, Holger
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [9] Sleep interventions for osteoarthritis and spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ho, K. K. N.
    Ferreira, P. H.
    Pinheiro, M. B.
    Silva, D. Aquino
    Miller, C. B.
    Grunstein, R.
    Simic, M.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2019, 27 (02) : 196 - 218
  • [10] EFFECTS OF PHARMACIST INTERVENTIONS ON PAIN INTENSITY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Veettil, S. K.
    Darouiche, G.
    Sawangjit, R.
    Cox, N.
    Lai, N. M.
    Chaiyakunapruk, N.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S308 - S309