Correlation of production constraints with the yield gap of apple cropping systems in Luochuan County, China

被引:29
|
作者
Zhang Dong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang Chong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li Xiao-lin [1 ,2 ]
Yang Xiu-shan [1 ,2 ]
Zhao Lu-bang [1 ,2 ]
Xia Shao-jie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Key Lab Biodivers & Organ Fanning, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
smallholder farmer; boundary line analysis; structural equation model (SEM); crop load; fertilization; tree performance; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; ENZYME-ACTIVITIES; FRUIT-QUALITY; SOIL; ORCHARD; INTENSIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; PARAMETERS; RESPONSES; LOAD;
D O I
10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62098-2
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Apple occupies a dominant position in fruit production globally, and has become the main income source of local smallholder farmers in Luochuan County in the Loess Plateau area, one of the largest apple production areas in China. However, the annual productivity of apple orchards in this region remains low and has gradually declined over the years. The distinction and correlation of production constraints can contribute to the promotion of apple orchard productivity and the development of a sustainable orchard system. In the present study, survey data from 71 smallholder farmers were analyzed using a yield gap model to distinguish the production constraints and determine their correlation with the yield gap based on the structural equation model (SEM). The results indicated that the average apple yield in Luochuan County was 29.9 t ha(-1) yr(-1), while the attainable yield (Y-att; the highest yield obtained from the on-farm surveys) was 58.1 t ha(-1) yr(-1). The average explained and unexplainable yield gaps were 26.3 and 1.87 t ha(-1) yr(-1). According to the boundary line analysis, crop load, number of sprayings and base fertilizer N were the top three constraints on apple production in 9.8, 7.8 and 7.8% of the plots, respectively. Among the production constraints, crop load and fruit weight affected apple yield through direct pathways, whereas other constraints influenced apple yield through an indirect pathway based on the SEM, explaining 51% of the yield variance by all the main production constraints. These results can improve the current understanding of production constraints and contribute to the development of management strategies and policies for improving apple yield.
引用
收藏
页码:1714 / 1725
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characterization of the main chickpea cropping systems in India using a yield gap analysis approach
    Hajjarpoor, Amir
    Vadez, Vincent
    Soltani, Afshin
    Gaur, Pooran
    Whitbread, Anthony
    Babu, Dharani Suresh
    Gumma, Murali Krishna
    Diancoumba, Madina
    Kholova, Jana
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2018, 223 : 93 - 104
  • [22] Yield and fruit quality of apple from conventional and organic production systems
    Talamini do Amarante, Cassandro Vidal
    Steffens, Cristiano Andre
    Mafra, Alvaro Luiz
    Albuquerque, Jackson Adriano
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2008, 43 (03) : 333 - 340
  • [23] Developing grain production policy in terms of multiple cropping systems in China
    Zuo, Lijun
    Wang, Xiao
    Zhang, Zengxiang
    Zhao, Xiaoli
    Liu, Fang
    Yi, Ling
    Liu, Bin
    LAND USE POLICY, 2014, 40 : 140 - 146
  • [24] Good agricultural practices (GAP) adoption intensity and production constraints in apple orchards of western Nepal
    Bajgain, Dinesh
    Tiwari, Injila
    Joshi, Hema
    Shah, Kabita Kumari
    Shrestha, Jiban
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (09)
  • [25] Increased grain production of cultivated land by closing the existing cropping intensity gap in Southern China
    Jiang, Li
    Chen, Xin
    Meng, Lijun
    Zhang, Guoliang
    Pan, Zhihua
    An, Pingli
    FOOD SECURITY, 2021, 13 (02) : 385 - 398
  • [26] Increased grain production of cultivated land by closing the existing cropping intensity gap in Southern China
    Li Jiang
    Xin Chen
    Lijun Meng
    Guoliang Zhang
    Zhihua Pan
    Pingli An
    Food Security, 2021, 13 : 385 - 398
  • [27] Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: III. Yield Trends
    Baldock, Jon O.
    Hedtcke, Janet L.
    Posner, Joshua L.
    Hall, John A.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (04) : 1509 - 1522
  • [28] Contributions from carbon and nitrogen in roots to closing the yield gap between conventional and organic cropping systems
    Cordoa, E. M.
    Chirinda, N.
    Li, F.
    Olesen, J. E.
    SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 34 (03) : 335 - 342
  • [29] Experimental assessment of the yield gap associated with maize production in the North China Plain
    Wang, Hongzhang
    Ren, Hao
    Han, Kun
    Zhang, Lihua
    Zhao, Yali
    Liu, Yuee
    He, Qijin
    Li, Geng
    Zhang, Jiwang
    Zhao, Bin
    Ren, Baizhao
    Liu, Peng
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2023, 295
  • [30] Does yield gap still matter? Evidence from rice production in China
    Sun, Zhiqi
    Hu, Ruifa
    Hong, Yu
    FOOD SECURITY, 2022, 14 (03) : 829 - 840