"Eco TLC" Decision of the European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 21 October 2020-Case No. C-556/19 ECLI:EU:C:2020:844

被引：0

作者：

不详

机构：

来源：

IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW | 2021年 / 52卷 / 01期

关键词：

State aid; State resources; Eco-body; Financial support; Waste treatment; Subsidies;

D O I：

10.1007/s40319-020-01001-1

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

Article 107(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a system whereby a private, non-profit eco-body, approved by the public authorities, receives contributions from those who place on the market a particular category of product and who enter into a contract with it to that effect, in return for a service consisting in the organisation on their behalf of the treatment of the waste from those products, and redistributes to operators responsible for the sorting and recovery of that waste, subsidies the amount of which is set out in the approval, in the light of environmental and social targets, does not constitute an intervention through State resources within the meaning of that provision, as long as those subsidies are not constantly under public control, which is for the referring court to determine.

引用

页码：92 / 92

页数：1

共 50 条

[21] “Facebook Ireland and Schrems”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 16 July 2020 – Case No. C-311/18 (ECLI:EU:C:2020:559)
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2020, 51 (7) : 901 - 902
[22] “Royalty Pharma Collection Trust”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 30 April 2020 – Case No. C-650/17 (ECLI:EU:C:2020:327)
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2020, 51 (6) : 770 - 770
[23] “Ferrari”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 22 October 2020 – Cases Nos. C–720/18 and C–721/18, ECLI:EU:C:2020:854
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2021, 52 : 236 - 237
[24] “Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier” Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 17 December 2020 – Case No. C 490/19; ECLI:EU:C:2020:1043
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2021, 52 (6) : 806 - 806
[25] “Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 14 January 2020 – Case No. C-450/19; ECLI:EU:C:2021:10
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2021, 52 (4) : 538 - 538
[26] “Stim and SAMI”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 2 April 20209 – Case No. C-753/18 (ECLI:EU:C:2020:268)
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2020, 51 (5) : 651 - 651
[27] “Fack Ju Göhte”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 27 February 2020 – Case No. C-240/18 P (ECLI:EU:C:2020:118)
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2020, 51 (4) : 511 - 513
[28] “Perfumesco.pl”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) 13 October 2022 – Case No. C-355/21; ECLI:EU:C:2022:791
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2022, 53 : 1575 - 1575
[29] “Ocilion”Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) 13 July 2023 – Case No. C-426/21; ECLI:EU:C:2023:564
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2024, 55 : 464 - 465
[30] “Gemeinde Bodman-Ludwigshafen”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 13 October 2022 – Case No. C-256/21; ECLI:EU:C:2022:786
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2023, 54 (1) : 143 - 143

← 1 2 3 4 5 →