“Kilpailu- ja kuluttajavirasto”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 14 January 2020 – Case No. C-450/19; ECLI:EU:C:2021:10

被引:0
|
作者
机构
关键词
Concerted practices and anticompetitive agreements; Manipulation of bidding procedure (bid-rigging cartel); Infringement period; Duration; Economic effects; Cessation of infringement with award of contract;
D O I
10.1007/s40319-021-01051-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Article 101(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that, where an undertaking which has allegedly participated in a single and continuous infringement of that provision, the most recent constituent element of which consists in the concerted submission with its competitors of a tender for the award of a public works contract, has won the contract and concluded with the contracting authority a works contract determining the essential characteristics of that contract and, in particular, the overall price to be paid for those works, the performance and payment of the price for which are staggered over time, the infringement period corresponds to the period up to the date of signature of the contract concluded between the undertaking and the contracting authority on the basis of the concerted bid submitted by that undertaking. It is for the national court to ascertain the date on which the essential characteristics of the relevant contract and, in particular, the total price to be paid for the work, have been definitively determined.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:538 / 538
相关论文
共 50 条