African Inland Fisheries: Experiences with Co-Management and Policies of Decentralization

被引:8
|
作者
Lewins, Roger [1 ]
Bene, Christophe [2 ]
Ousman, Baba Malloum [3 ]
Belal, Emma [3 ]
Donda, Steve [4 ]
Lamine, Abbagana Mamane [5 ]
Makadassou, Alassane [5 ]
Tahir, Na Andi Mamane [5 ]
Neiland, Arthur E. [6 ]
Njaya, Friday [4 ]
Ovie, Solomon [7 ]
Raji, Aminu [7 ]
机构
[1] Brinjal, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Sussex, Inst Dev Studies, Brighton BN1 9RE, E Sussex, England
[3] Minist Livestock Fisheries & Anim Ind, Yaounde, Cameroon
[4] Dept Fisheries, Lilongwe, Malawi
[5] Direct Peche, Niamey, Niger
[6] IDDRA Ltd, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[7] Natl Inst Freshwater Fisheries Res, New Bussa, Nigeria
关键词
decentralization; co-management; participation; fisheries development; institutions; natural resource management; governance; african fisheries;
D O I
10.1080/08941920.2013.861564
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Most countries in Africa have promoted some form of decentralized fisheries management either as discrete co-management projects or as a component of broader decentralization processes that cut across other sectors. These initiatives were shaped by an international policy narrative that emphasises participation in decision making and development. A review of fisheries decentralization experiences in Cameroon, Niger, Nigeria, and Malawi reveals marked differences in purpose, strategy, and performance. In general, co-management projects are limited by their ability to scale up new practice and to maintain viable and representative management institutions. In other cases, the decentralization process is not well supported politically or locally or does not articulate with fisheries policy. Experiences of decentralization in other sectors provide useful lessons. Acknowledging the informal institutional environment or realpolitikof fisheries and the rural economy could provide opportunities to better manage and review the process of decentralization.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 420
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coastal and fisheries co-management in South Africa: an overview and analysis
    Hauck, M
    Sowman, M
    MARINE POLICY, 2001, 25 (03) : 173 - 185
  • [43] Social dimensions of local fisheries co-management in the Coral Triangle
    Cohen, Philippa Jane
    Steenbergen, Dirk Johan
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 42 (03) : 278 - 288
  • [44] Resource co-management as a step towards gender equity in fisheries
    Freitas, Carolina T.
    Espirito-Santo, Helder M., V
    Campos-Silva, Joao Vitor
    Peres, Carlos A.
    Lopes, Priscila F. M.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 176
  • [45] Co-management of sea turtle fisheries: Biogeography versus geopolitics
    Campbell, Lisa M.
    Silver, Jennifer J.
    Gray, Noella J.
    Ranger, Sue
    Broderick, Annette
    Fisher, Tatum
    Godfrey, Matthew H.
    Gore, Shannon
    Jeffers, John
    Martin, Corrine
    McGowan, Andrew
    Richardson, Peter
    Sasso, Carlos
    Slade, Lorna
    Godley, Brendan
    MARINE POLICY, 2009, 33 (01) : 137 - 145
  • [46] Participatory governance in inshore fisheries co-management in England and Wales
    Knapman, P
    Participation in Fisheries Governance, 2005, 4 : 163 - 178
  • [47] Co-management of coral reef fisheries: A critical evaluation of the literature
    Wamukota, A. W.
    Cinner, J. E.
    McClanahan, T. R.
    MARINE POLICY, 2012, 36 (02) : 481 - 488
  • [48] Evaluating the theoretical and practical linkages between ecosystem-based fisheries management and fisheries co-management
    Cucuzza, Marina
    Stoll, Joshua S.
    Leslie, Heather M.
    MARINE POLICY, 2021, 126
  • [49] Nunavut Fisheries Co-management and the Role of the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement in Fisheries Management and Decision Making
    Boudreau, Stephanie A.
    Fanning, Lucia
    OCEAN YEARBOOK, 2016, 30 (01): : 207 - 241
  • [50] Cross-scale linkages and adaptive management: Fisheries co-management in Asia
    Wilson, Douglas Clyde
    Ahmed, Mahfuzuddin
    Siar, Susanna V.
    Kanagaratnam, Usha
    MARINE POLICY, 2006, 30 (05) : 523 - 533