Co-management of coral reef fisheries: A critical evaluation of the literature

被引:53
|
作者
Wamukota, A. W. [1 ]
Cinner, J. E. [2 ]
McClanahan, T. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Coral Reef Conservat Project, Mombasa, Kenya
[2] James Cook Univ, Ctr Excellence Coral Reef, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[3] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Marine Program, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
关键词
Common property; Institutional design principles; Co-management; Socioeconomic; MARINE PROTECTED AREAS; COASTAL RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES; SUCCESS; CONSERVATION; PERFORMANCE; RESILIENCE; VISAYAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2011.09.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In many parts of the world, inshore marine resources are being increasingly managed through collaborative arrangements between communities, governments, civil society and other groups. However, co-management of fisheries has had a mixture of successes and failures. Theorists and applied researchers have suggested a series of preconditions or factors thought to improve the chances of successful common-pool resource management. These include common property institutional design principles and their contextual conditions. Using a variety of web-based English keyword searches, published literature on community-based management and co-management of coral reefs was systematically reviewed with the view of determining if and how studies were evaluating these management systems as well as the extent to which critical aspects of common property theory were investigated and tested. Based on a screening of 600 and full evaluation of 157 journal articles, four measures of ecological conditions and five measures of contextual condition improvement were examined or could be evaluated with the data presented in 38 papers, which examined 49 co-management projects. Fewer than half of the 49 studies met the inclusion criteria of the analyses for documenting key design principles or contextual conditions. Additionally, most projects did not systematically report on contextual conditions, common property design principles and measures of success. The analysis demonstrates the large theoretical and empirical gaps in the evaluation of these management systems and begs for a more scientific, critical and multivariate approach. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 488
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Emergence of co-management governance for Hawai'i coral reef fisheries
    Ayers, Adam L.
    Kittinger, John N.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 28 : 251 - 262
  • [2] Social dimensions of local fisheries co-management in the Coral Triangle
    Cohen, Philippa Jane
    Steenbergen, Dirk Johan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 42 (03) : 278 - 288
  • [3] Maneuvering towards adaptive co-management in a coral reef fishery
    Hunter, Chelsea E.
    Lauer, Matthew
    Levine, Arielle
    Holbrook, Sally
    Rassweiler, Andrew
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2018, 98 : 77 - 84
  • [4] Fisheries co-management in Japan
    Makino, Mitsutaku
    [J]. NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, 2017, 83 (06) : 1025 - 1025
  • [5] Fisheries co-management as empowerment
    Jentoft, S
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2005, 29 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [6] Transitioning to co-management in Caribbean reef fisheries: Tela Bay case study
    Rivera, A.
    San Martin-Chicas, J.
    Myton, J.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (04) : 1233 - 1250
  • [7] Transitioning to co-management in Caribbean reef fisheries: Tela Bay case study
    A. Rivera
    J. San Martin-Chicas
    J. Myton
    [J]. Sustainability Science, 2021, 16 : 1233 - 1250
  • [8] Towards a functional typology of small-scale fisheries co-management informed by stakeholder perceptions: A coral reef case study
    Brewer, T. D.
    Moon, K.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2015, 51 : 48 - 56
  • [9] Co-management and crisis in fisheries science and management
    McCay, BJ
    [J]. MARINE RESOURCES: PROPERTY RIGHTS, ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 14 : 341 - 359
  • [10] Social theory and fisheries co-management
    Jentoft, S
    McCay, BJ
    Wilson, DC
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 1998, 22 (4-5) : 423 - 436