Factors Affecting the Success of Next-Generation Sequencing in Cytology Specimens

被引:113
|
作者
Roy-Chowdhuri, Sinchita [1 ]
Goswami, Rashmi S. [2 ]
Chen, Hui [1 ]
Patel, Keyur P. [2 ]
Routbort, Mark J. [2 ]
Singh, Rajesh R. [2 ]
Broaddus, Russell R. [1 ]
Barkoh, Bedia A. [2 ]
Manekia, Jawed [2 ]
Yao, Hui [3 ]
Medeiros, L. Jeffrey [2 ]
Staerkel, Gregg [1 ]
Luthra, Rajyalakshmi [2 ]
Stewart, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Div Pathol & Lab Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hematopathol, Div Pathol & Lab Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Bioinformat & Computat Biol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
cytology; Ion Torrent; limited samples; molecular; mutational analysis; next-generation sequencing; pre-analytical factors; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; LUNG-CANCER PATIENTS; EGFR; DIAGNOSIS; CYTOPATHOLOGY; SAMPLES; BIOPSY; PATHOLOGISTS; PERCENTAGE;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.21597
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The use of cytology specimens for next-generation sequencing (NGS) is particularly challenging because of the unconventional substrate of smears and the often limited sample volume. An analysis of factors affecting NGS testing in cytologic samples may help to increase the frequency of successful testing. METHODS: This study reviewed variables associated with all in-house cytology cases (n = 207) that were analyzed by NGS with the Ion Torrent platform during a 10-month interval. A statistical analysis was performed to measure the effects of the DNA input threshold, specimen preparation, slide type, tumor fraction, DNA yield, and cytopathologist bias. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four of 207 cases (79%) were successfully sequenced by NGS; 43 (21%) failed because of either a low DNA yield or a template/library preparation failure. The median estimated tumor fraction and DNA concentration for the successfully sequenced cases were 70% and 2.5 ng/mu L, respectively, whereas they were 60% and 0.2 ng/mu L, respectively, for NGS failures. Cell block sections were tested in 91 cases, and smears were used in 116 cases. NGS success positively correlated with the DNA yield but not the tumor fraction. Cell block preparations showed a higher success rate than smears. Frosted-tip slides yielded significantly more DNA than fully frosted slides. Lowering the input DNA concentration below the manufacturer's recommended threshold of 10 ng (> 0.85 ng/mu L) resulted in a marked increase in the NGS success rate from 58.6% to 89.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The failure of NGS with cytology samples is usually a result of suboptimal DNA due to multiple pre-analytical factors. Knowledge of these factors will allow better selection of cytology material for mutational analysis. (C) 2015 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 668
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Next generation sequencing in cytology
    Pisapia, Pasquale
    Pepe, Francesco
    Sgariglia, Roberta
    Nacchio, Mariantonia
    Russo, Gianluca
    Conticelli, Floriana
    Girolami, Ilaria
    Eccher, Albino
    Bellevicine, Claudio
    Vigliar, Elena
    Malapelle, Umberto
    Troncone, Giancarlo
    [J]. CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 32 (05) : 588 - 595
  • [42] Next-generation sequencing assay in salivary gland cytology: A pilot study
    Yamamoto, Shuhei
    Sakamoto, Yuma
    Nakano, Satsuki
    Fujii, Keiichiro
    Ueda, Kaori
    Okumura, Yoshihide
    Tsuda, Kana
    Masaki, Ayako
    Kawakita, Daisuke
    Murase, Takayuki
    Inagaki, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2020, 49 (10) : 1037 - 1043
  • [43] Comprehensive Validation of Cytology Samples for Downstream Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing
    Sidiropoulos, N.
    Hampel, K. J.
    Anderson, S. R.
    Schwartz, M.
    Gibson, P. C.
    Giroux, S.
    Leiman, G.
    Balla, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2015, 17 (06): : 844 - 845
  • [44] Utility of bronchoscopically obtained frozen cytology pellets for next-generation sequencing
    Mimura, Chihiro
    Takamiya, Rei
    Fujimoto, Shodai
    Fukui, Takafumi
    Yatani, Atsuhiko
    Yamada, Jun
    Takayasu, Mizuki
    Takata, Naoya
    Sato, Hiroki
    Fukuda, Kiyoko
    Furukawa, Koichi
    Hazama, Daisuke
    Katsurada, Naoko
    Yamamoto, Masatsugu
    Matsumoto, Shingo
    Goto, Koichi
    Tachihara, Motoko
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [45] APPLICATIONS OF NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING Sequencing technologies - the next generation
    Metzker, Michael L.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2010, 11 (01) : 31 - 46
  • [46] Factors Affecting Migration to GRCh38 in Laboratories Performing Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing
    Lansdon, Lisa A.
    Cadieux-Dion, Maxime
    Yoo, Byunggil
    Miller, Neil
    Cohen, Ana S. A.
    Zellmer, Lee
    Zhang, Lei
    Farrow, Emily G.
    Thiffault, Isabelle
    Repnikova, Elena A.
    Cooley, Linda D.
    Alaimo, Joseph T.
    Porath, Binu
    Herriges, John C.
    Saunders, Carol J.
    Farooqi, Midhat S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 23 (05): : 651 - 657
  • [47] Characterization of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Specimens by Next-Generation Sequencing
    Sadri, Navid
    Willis, Joseph
    Morrow, James J.
    Alouani, David J.
    Atchley, Maureen
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 819 - 819
  • [48] Genotyping Influenza Virus by Next-Generation Deep Sequencing in Clinical Specimens
    Seong, Moon-Woo
    Cho, Sung Im
    Park, Hyunwoong
    Seo, Soo Hyun
    Lee, Seung Jun
    Kim, Eui-Chong
    Park, Sung Sup
    [J]. ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 36 (03) : 255 - 258
  • [49] Characterization of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Specimens by Next-Generation Sequencing
    Sadri, Navid
    Willis, Joseph
    Morrow, James J.
    Alouani, David J.
    Atchley, Maureen
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 819 - 819
  • [50] Evaluation and diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing analysis of residual liquid-based cytology specimens of pancreatic masses
    Sekita-Hatakeyama, Yoko
    Fujii, Tomomi
    Nishikawa, Takeshi
    Mitoro, Akira
    Sawai, Masayoshi
    Itami, Hiroe
    Morita, Kouhei
    Uchiyama, Tomoko
    Takeda, Maiko
    Sho, Masayuki
    Yoshiji, Hitoshi
    Hatakeyama, Kinta
    Ohbayashi, Chiho
    [J]. CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2022, 130 (03) : 202 - 214