Factors Affecting the Success of Next-Generation Sequencing in Cytology Specimens

被引:113
|
作者
Roy-Chowdhuri, Sinchita [1 ]
Goswami, Rashmi S. [2 ]
Chen, Hui [1 ]
Patel, Keyur P. [2 ]
Routbort, Mark J. [2 ]
Singh, Rajesh R. [2 ]
Broaddus, Russell R. [1 ]
Barkoh, Bedia A. [2 ]
Manekia, Jawed [2 ]
Yao, Hui [3 ]
Medeiros, L. Jeffrey [2 ]
Staerkel, Gregg [1 ]
Luthra, Rajyalakshmi [2 ]
Stewart, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Div Pathol & Lab Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Hematopathol, Div Pathol & Lab Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Bioinformat & Computat Biol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
cytology; Ion Torrent; limited samples; molecular; mutational analysis; next-generation sequencing; pre-analytical factors; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; LUNG-CANCER PATIENTS; EGFR; DIAGNOSIS; CYTOPATHOLOGY; SAMPLES; BIOPSY; PATHOLOGISTS; PERCENTAGE;
D O I
10.1002/cncy.21597
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The use of cytology specimens for next-generation sequencing (NGS) is particularly challenging because of the unconventional substrate of smears and the often limited sample volume. An analysis of factors affecting NGS testing in cytologic samples may help to increase the frequency of successful testing. METHODS: This study reviewed variables associated with all in-house cytology cases (n = 207) that were analyzed by NGS with the Ion Torrent platform during a 10-month interval. A statistical analysis was performed to measure the effects of the DNA input threshold, specimen preparation, slide type, tumor fraction, DNA yield, and cytopathologist bias. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-four of 207 cases (79%) were successfully sequenced by NGS; 43 (21%) failed because of either a low DNA yield or a template/library preparation failure. The median estimated tumor fraction and DNA concentration for the successfully sequenced cases were 70% and 2.5 ng/mu L, respectively, whereas they were 60% and 0.2 ng/mu L, respectively, for NGS failures. Cell block sections were tested in 91 cases, and smears were used in 116 cases. NGS success positively correlated with the DNA yield but not the tumor fraction. Cell block preparations showed a higher success rate than smears. Frosted-tip slides yielded significantly more DNA than fully frosted slides. Lowering the input DNA concentration below the manufacturer's recommended threshold of 10 ng (> 0.85 ng/mu L) resulted in a marked increase in the NGS success rate from 58.6% to 89.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The failure of NGS with cytology samples is usually a result of suboptimal DNA due to multiple pre-analytical factors. Knowledge of these factors will allow better selection of cytology material for mutational analysis. (C) 2015 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 668
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Next-Generation Sequencing
    Le Gallo, Matthieu
    Lozy, Fred
    Bell, Daphne W.
    [J]. MOLECULAR GENETICS OF ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA, 2017, 943 : 119 - 148
  • [32] Next-generation sequencing
    Haferlach, T.
    [J]. ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 : 40 - 41
  • [33] Next-Generation Sequencing
    Xiong, Momiao
    Zhao, Zhongming
    Arnold, Jonathan
    Yu, Fuli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2010,
  • [34] Next-generation sequencing
    Jorge S Reis-Filho
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 11
  • [35] Next-generation sequencing
    Reis-Filho, Jorge S.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 11
  • [36] Comparison of sample types with success rates of next-generation sequencing
    Sakamoto, Tomohiro
    Kodani, Masahiro
    Matsumoto, Shingo
    Hirayama, Yuki
    Yamane, Kohei
    Teruya, Yasuhiko
    Tanaka, Natsumi
    Kinoshita, Naoki
    Yamaguchi, Kosuke
    Makino, Haruhiko
    Igishi, Tadashi
    Goto, Koichi
    Yamasaki, Akira
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [37] Improving Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Success in Solid Tumors
    Goswami, Rashmi
    Chen, Hui
    Patel, Keyur
    Routbort, Mark
    Yao, Hui
    Dang, Hyvan
    Barkoh, Bedia
    Aldape, Ken
    Chowdhuri, Sinchita Roy
    Stewart, John
    Medeiros, L.
    Broaddus, Russell
    Singh, Rajesh
    Luthra, Rajyalakshmi
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 : 499A - 499A
  • [38] Comparison of Sample Types with Success Rates of Next-Generation Sequencing
    Yamane, K.
    Sakamoto, T.
    Terutya, Y.
    Yanai, M.
    Kinosita, N.
    Yamaguchi, K.
    Makino, H.
    Kodani, M.
    Igishi, T.
    Yamasaki, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (10) : S1005 - S1005
  • [39] Improving Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Success in Solid Tumors
    Goswami, Rashmi
    Chen, Hui
    Patel, Keyur
    Routbort, Mark
    Yao, Hui
    Dang, Hyvan
    Barkoh, Bedia
    Aldape, Ken
    Chowdhuri, Sinchita Roy
    Stewart, John
    Medeiros, L.
    Broaddus, Russell
    Singh, Rajesh
    Luthra, Rajyalakshmi
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 95 : 499A - 499A