Helical cone-beam tomography

被引:1
|
作者
Turbell, H [1 ]
Danielsson, PE [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Image Proc Lab, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1098-1098(2000)11:1<91::AID-IMA10>3.0.CO;2-F
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Recently, several computed tomography (CT) machines with multirow detectors have been introduced on the market. Although the projections are obtained from a cone beam rather than a fan beam, multislice reconstruction algorithms in contemporary machines are firmly rooted in two-dimensional (2D) reconstruction of planar objects. Short-scan algorithms are dominating and these are preferably classified according to how redundant data are handled, using parallel rebinning, complementary rebinning, or Parker weighting. In the long run, truly 3D cone-beam algorithms are likely to take over, however. It has proved to be quite a challenge to design an algorithm that is both practical and exact under the constraints set by helical source path geometry. All attempts in this direction are readily seen to be derivatives of Grangeat's algorithm. Alternative research efforts have been building on the nonexact algorithm by Feldkamp et al. (J Opt Soc Am 1: 612-619, 1984). These algorithms strive for simplicity using 1D filtering only. In this overview, we pay special attention to the PI method, which has the unique property that all object points are illuminated by the source during exactly 180 degrees, which generates complete and nonredundant data. Two new algorithms, PI-SLANT and P1-2D, are also presented with some experimental results. (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Iterative reconstruction algorithm for half-cover dual helical cone-beam computed tomography
    Zhao, Yunsong
    Zou, Xiaobing
    Yu, Wei
    INSIGHT, 2013, 55 (05) : 232 - 236
  • [42] A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK OF REGIONAL CONE-BEAM TOMOGRAPHY
    CHEN, JX
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1992, 11 (03) : 342 - 350
  • [43] Scanning of logs with linear cone-beam tomography
    Seger, MM
    Danielsson, PE
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2003, 41 (1-3) : 45 - 62
  • [44] Evaluating the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography
    Stratemann, Scott A.
    Huang, John C.
    Maki, Koutaro
    Hatcher, David C.
    Miller, Arthur J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2010, 137 (04) : S58 - S70
  • [45] Simple ROI Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Maass, Clemens
    Knaup, Michael
    Sawall, Stefan
    Kachelriess, Marc
    2010 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2010, : 3161 - 3168
  • [46] Geometric misalignment and calibration in cone-beam tomography
    von Smekal, L
    Kachelriess, M
    Stepina, E
    Kalender, WA
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (12) : 3242 - 3266
  • [47] Operational principles for cone-beam computed tomography
    Hatcher, David C.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 141 (10): : 3S - 6S
  • [48] Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: Beyond Diagnostics
    Perel, Morton L.
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2015, 24 (04) : 367 - 367
  • [49] Boundary reconstruction on chords in cone-beam tomography
    Mark A. Anastasio
    Emil Y. Sidky
    中国体视学与图像分析, 2005, (03) : 137 - 140
  • [50] Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography
    Cotton, Taylor P.
    Geisler, Todd M.
    Holden, David T.
    Schwartz, Scott A.
    Schindler, William G.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2007, 33 (09) : 1121 - 1132