Helical cone-beam tomography

被引:1
|
作者
Turbell, H [1 ]
Danielsson, PE [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Image Proc Lab, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1098-1098(2000)11:1<91::AID-IMA10>3.0.CO;2-F
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Recently, several computed tomography (CT) machines with multirow detectors have been introduced on the market. Although the projections are obtained from a cone beam rather than a fan beam, multislice reconstruction algorithms in contemporary machines are firmly rooted in two-dimensional (2D) reconstruction of planar objects. Short-scan algorithms are dominating and these are preferably classified according to how redundant data are handled, using parallel rebinning, complementary rebinning, or Parker weighting. In the long run, truly 3D cone-beam algorithms are likely to take over, however. It has proved to be quite a challenge to design an algorithm that is both practical and exact under the constraints set by helical source path geometry. All attempts in this direction are readily seen to be derivatives of Grangeat's algorithm. Alternative research efforts have been building on the nonexact algorithm by Feldkamp et al. (J Opt Soc Am 1: 612-619, 1984). These algorithms strive for simplicity using 1D filtering only. In this overview, we pay special attention to the PI method, which has the unique property that all object points are illuminated by the source during exactly 180 degrees, which generates complete and nonredundant data. Two new algorithms, PI-SLANT and P1-2D, are also presented with some experimental results. (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 100
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Practical cone-beam lambda tomography
    Yu, Hengyong
    Ye, Yangbo
    Wang, Ge
    DEVELOPMENTS IN X-RAY TOMOGRAPHY V, 2006, 6318
  • [22] Asymmetric cone-beam transmission tomography
    Zeng, GSL
    Gullberg, GT
    Christian, PE
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2001, 48 (01) : 117 - 124
  • [23] Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Orthodontics
    Abdelkarim, Ahmad
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2019, 7 (03)
  • [24] Noise Reduction Using a Theoretically-Exact Algorithm for Helical Cone-Beam Tomography
    Venkataraman, Rajesh
    Noo, Frederic
    Kudo, Hiroyuki
    2006 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOL 1-6, 2006, : 1674 - 1678
  • [25] Limited cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the middle ear: A comparison with multislice helical computed tomography
    Peltonen, L. I.
    Aarnisalo, A. A.
    Kortesniemi, M. K.
    Suomalainen, A.
    Jero, J.
    Robinson, S.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2007, 48 (02) : 207 - 212
  • [26] Kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging dose estimation and optimization: Need of daily cone-beam computed tomography
    Trivedi, Gaurav
    Dixit, Chandra K.
    Oinam, Arun S.
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    Bahl, Amit
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (03) : 470 - 474
  • [27] Noise Properties in Helical Cone-beam CT Images
    Xia, Dan
    Sidky, Emil Y.
    Yu, Lifeng
    Pan, Xiaochuan
    2006 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOL 1-6, 2006, : 3428 - 3430
  • [28] Redundant data and exact helical cone-beam reconstruction
    Heuscher, D
    Brown, K
    Noo, F
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (11): : 2219 - 2238
  • [29] Multirow detector and cone-beam spiral/helical CT
    Wang, G
    Crawford, CR
    Kalender, WA
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2000, 19 (09) : 817 - 821
  • [30] Evaluation of helical cone-beam CT reconstruction algorithms
    Köhler, T
    Bontus, C
    Brown, K
    Heuscher, D
    Grass, M
    Shechter, G
    Proksa, R
    2002 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM, CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 1217 - 1220