HEALTH ECONOMICS LETTER RESPONSE-SCALE HETEROGENEITY IN THE EQ-5D

被引:11
|
作者
Knott, Rachel J. [1 ]
Black, Nicole [1 ]
Hollingsworth, Bruce [2 ]
Lorgelly, Paula K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Monash Business Sch, Ctr Hlth Econ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Lancaster, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
EQ-5D; multi-attribute utility instruments; differential item functioning; reporting heterogeneity; response-scale heterogeneity; preference heterogeneity; anchoring vignettes; ANCHORING VIGNETTES; REPORTING HETEROGENEITY; IDENTIFICATION; SATISFACTION; POPULATION; INFERENCE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/hec.3313
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper discusses two types of response-scale heterogeneity, which may impact upon the EQ-5D. Response-scale heterogeneity in reporting occurs when individuals systematically differ in their use of response scales when responding to self-assessments. This type of heterogeneity is widely observed in relation to other self-assessed measures but is often overlooked with regard to the EQ-5D. Analogous to this, preference elicitation involving the EQ-5D could be subject to a similar type of heterogeneity, where variations across respondents may occur in the interpretations of the levels (response categories) being valued. This responsescale heterogeneity in preference elicitation may differ from variations in preferences for health states, which have been observed in the literature. This paper explores what these forms of response-scale heterogeneity may mean for the EQ-5D and the potential implications for researchers who rely on the instrument as a measure of health and quality of life. We identify situations where they are likely to be problematic and present potential avenues for overcoming these issues. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 394
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EQ-5D HEALTH UTILITIES ARE ESTIMATED SUBJECT TO CONSIDERABLE UNCERTAINTY
    Pullenayegum, E. M.
    Xie, F.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A195 - A195
  • [42] Validation of the EQ-5D in Taiwan using item response theory
    Liu, Tzu-Hung
    Ho, Andrew D.
    Hsu, Yu-Tien
    Hsu, Chih-Cheng
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [43] VALUATIONS OF EQ-5D HEALTH STATES: ARE THE US AND UK DIFFERENT?
    Johnson, Jeffrey A.
    Luo, Nan
    Shaw, James W.
    Coons, Stephen J.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (09) : 1508 - 1508
  • [44] Do health preferences contradict ordering of EQ-5D labels?
    Craig, Benjamin M.
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Rand-Hendriksen, Kim
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (07) : 1759 - 1765
  • [45] Validation of the EQ-5D in Taiwan using item response theory
    Tzu-Hung Liu
    Andrew D. Ho
    Yu-Tien Hsu
    Chih-Cheng Hsu
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 21
  • [46] CHOOSING HEALTH STATES FOR ELICITATION OF POPULATION PREFERENCES FOR THE EQ-5D
    Adams, R.
    Reddy, B.
    Kind, P.
    Barry, M.
    Walsh, C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A595 - A595
  • [47] Trading health values in Chile and the US using EQ-5D
    Kind, P.
    Zarate, V
    Olivares-Tirado, P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (03) : A190 - A190
  • [48] EuroQol (EQ-5D) health utility scores for patients with migraine
    Xu, Ruifeng
    Insinga, Ralph P.
    Golden, Wendy
    Hu, X. Henry
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (04) : 601 - 608
  • [49] INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF EQ-5D HEALTH-STATES VALUATIONS
    Garcia-Molina, M.
    Chicaiza, L.
    Rincon, C. J.
    Romano, G.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A165 - A165
  • [50] EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group
    Rabin, R
    de Charro, F
    [J]. ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (05) : 337 - 343