HEALTH ECONOMICS LETTER RESPONSE-SCALE HETEROGENEITY IN THE EQ-5D

被引:11
|
作者
Knott, Rachel J. [1 ]
Black, Nicole [1 ]
Hollingsworth, Bruce [2 ]
Lorgelly, Paula K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Monash Business Sch, Ctr Hlth Econ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Lancaster, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
EQ-5D; multi-attribute utility instruments; differential item functioning; reporting heterogeneity; response-scale heterogeneity; preference heterogeneity; anchoring vignettes; ANCHORING VIGNETTES; REPORTING HETEROGENEITY; IDENTIFICATION; SATISFACTION; POPULATION; INFERENCE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/hec.3313
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper discusses two types of response-scale heterogeneity, which may impact upon the EQ-5D. Response-scale heterogeneity in reporting occurs when individuals systematically differ in their use of response scales when responding to self-assessments. This type of heterogeneity is widely observed in relation to other self-assessed measures but is often overlooked with regard to the EQ-5D. Analogous to this, preference elicitation involving the EQ-5D could be subject to a similar type of heterogeneity, where variations across respondents may occur in the interpretations of the levels (response categories) being valued. This responsescale heterogeneity in preference elicitation may differ from variations in preferences for health states, which have been observed in the literature. This paper explores what these forms of response-scale heterogeneity may mean for the EQ-5D and the potential implications for researchers who rely on the instrument as a measure of health and quality of life. We identify situations where they are likely to be problematic and present potential avenues for overcoming these issues. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 394
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Health Utilities Using the EQ-5D in Studies of Cancer
    A. Simon Pickard
    Caitlyn T. Wilke
    Hsiang-Wen Lin
    Andrew Lloyd
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2007, 25 : 365 - 384
  • [13] APPLIED CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE EQ-5D HEALTH UTILITY INDEX
    Ghushchyan, V. H.
    Sullivan, P. W.
    Libby, A. M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A8 - A8
  • [14] Improving valuation sampling of EQ-5D health states
    Adrian Bagust
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11
  • [15] The Effect of Health State Selection on the Valuation of EQ-5D
    Chuang, Ling-Hsiang
    Kind, Paul
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2011, 31 (01) : 186 - 194
  • [16] Valuing EQ-5D health states for Sri Lanka
    Kularatna, Sanjeewa
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Johnson, Newell W.
    Jayasinghe, Ruwan
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (07) : 1785 - 1793
  • [17] Valuing EQ-5D health states for Sri Lanka
    Sanjeewa Kularatna
    Jennifer A. Whitty
    Newell W. Johnson
    Ruwan Jayasinghe
    Paul A. Scuffham
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1785 - 1793
  • [18] International valuation set for EQ-5D health states
    Craig, B. M.
    Busschbach, J. J.
    Salomon, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : A177 - A177
  • [19] Improving valuation sampling of EQ-5D health states
    Bagust, Adrian
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
  • [20] THE EQ-5D HEALTH STATES VALUE SET FOR SLOVENIA
    Rupel, Valentina Prevolnik
    Ogorevc, Marko
    [J]. ZDRAVSTVENO VARSTVO, 2012, 51 (02): : 128 - 140