HEALTH ECONOMICS LETTER RESPONSE-SCALE HETEROGENEITY IN THE EQ-5D

被引:11
|
作者
Knott, Rachel J. [1 ]
Black, Nicole [1 ]
Hollingsworth, Bruce [2 ]
Lorgelly, Paula K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Monash Business Sch, Ctr Hlth Econ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Lancaster, Div Hlth Res, Lancaster, England
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
EQ-5D; multi-attribute utility instruments; differential item functioning; reporting heterogeneity; response-scale heterogeneity; preference heterogeneity; anchoring vignettes; ANCHORING VIGNETTES; REPORTING HETEROGENEITY; IDENTIFICATION; SATISFACTION; POPULATION; INFERENCE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1002/hec.3313
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper discusses two types of response-scale heterogeneity, which may impact upon the EQ-5D. Response-scale heterogeneity in reporting occurs when individuals systematically differ in their use of response scales when responding to self-assessments. This type of heterogeneity is widely observed in relation to other self-assessed measures but is often overlooked with regard to the EQ-5D. Analogous to this, preference elicitation involving the EQ-5D could be subject to a similar type of heterogeneity, where variations across respondents may occur in the interpretations of the levels (response categories) being valued. This responsescale heterogeneity in preference elicitation may differ from variations in preferences for health states, which have been observed in the literature. This paper explores what these forms of response-scale heterogeneity may mean for the EQ-5D and the potential implications for researchers who rely on the instrument as a measure of health and quality of life. We identify situations where they are likely to be problematic and present potential avenues for overcoming these issues. Copyright (C) 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 394
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMMENT ON 'RESPONSE-SCALE HETEROGENEITY IN THE EQ-5D: CAN WE USE VIGNETTES TO ADDRESS RESPONSE-SCALE HETEROGENEITY IN THE EQ-5D? NOT IF BUT HOW'
    Robone, Silvana
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2017, 26 (03)
  • [2] The EQ-5D as a measure of health outcomes
    Cabases, Juan M.
    [J]. GACETA SANITARIA, 2015, 29 (06) : 401 - 403
  • [3] New weights for old: A scale of values for EQ-5D health states
    Kind, P
    Macran, S
    Hennessy, S
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) : 245 - 245
  • [4] Is the EQ-5D fit for purpose in mental health?
    Brazier, John
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 197 (05) : 348 - 349
  • [5] Argentine Valuation of the EQ-5D Health States
    Ariel Augustovski, Federico
    Edit Irazola, Vilma
    Pascual Velazquez, Alberto
    Gibbons, Luz
    Craig, Benjamin M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (04) : 587 - 596
  • [6] Summarizing population health using EQ-5D
    Chuang, L. H.
    Kind, P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (06) : A205 - A205
  • [7] CHILEAN VALUATION OF THE EQ-5D HEALTH STATES
    Zarate, V
    Kind, P.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A98 - A98
  • [8] THE TRANSLATION AND LINGUISTIC VALIDATION OF THE EQ-5D ELECTRONIC VERSION (EQ-5D EPRO)
    Ashcroft-Jones, A. J.
    Furtado, T.
    Wild, D.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A20 - A20
  • [9] UTILITIES OF THE EQ-5D: TRANSFERABLE OR NOT? INFLUENCE OF THE NATIONAL VALUE SETS OF THE EQ-5D ON THE INCREMENTAL UTILITIES OF TWO HEALTH STATES
    Knies, S.
    Evers, S. M. A. A.
    Severens, J. L.
    Candel, M. J. J. M.
    Ament, A. J. H. A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A575 - A575
  • [10] Scale Characteristics and Mapping Accuracy of the US EQ-5D, UK EQ-5D, and SF-6D in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
    Wolfe, Frederick
    Michaud, Kaleb
    Wallenstein, Gene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 37 (08) : 1615 - 1625