Intercycle variability of the ovarian response in patients undergoing repeated stimulation with corifollitropin alfa in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol

被引:27
|
作者
Rombauts, Luk [1 ,2 ]
Lambalk, Cornelis B. [3 ]
Schultze-Mosgau, Askan [4 ]
van Kuijk, Jacqueline [5 ]
Verweij, Pierre [5 ]
Gates, Davis [6 ]
Gordon, Keith [6 ]
Griesinger, Georg [4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[2] Monash IVF, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Clin Schleswig Holstein, Dept Reprod Med & Gynecol Endocrinol, Lubeck, Germany
[5] MSD Oss NV, Oss, Netherlands
[6] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ USA
关键词
Corifollitropin alfa; GnRH antagonist; repeated ovarian stimulation; ovarian response; controlled ovarian stimulation; CONSECUTIVE CYCLES; HYPERSTIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether individual subject variation in ovarian response between repeated cycles with the same ovarian stimulation protocol can be predicted. Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: Multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial. Patient(s): Women aged 18-39 from a phase 3, open-label, uncontrolled trial with complete data across all cycles (n = 176). Intervention(s): Up to three cycles of a single injection of 150 mu g corifollitropin alfa for 7 days, then daily recombinant FSH/hMG until three follicles reached >= 17 mm. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist from stimulation day 5 until day of hCG administration. Main Outcome Measure(s): Numbers of follicles >= 11 mm on day of hCG in cycles 1-3, transition in ovarian response type between cycles from low (0-< 6), normal (6-<18), and high (>= 18), and serum FSH concentrations and antral follicle count (AFC) at each cycle start. Result(s): The mean (SD) numbers of follicles >= 11 mm on day of hCG were 13.4 (6.2), 13.3 (5.4), and 13.8 (6.4) in cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Between cycles 1 and 2, 11.9% switched from normal to low or high response, and 12.5% switched from low or high to normal response; 75.6% remained in the same category. Between cycles 2 and 3, 15.9% switched from normal to low or high response, and 10.2% switched from low or high to normal response; 73.9% remained in the same category. These shifts are symmetrical in nature, in that the percentage of subjects who shift from normal to low or high response is comparable to the percentage of subjects who shift from low or high to normal response. Baseline FSH and AFC did not significantly predict transition in ovarian response. Conclusion(s): The variability in ovarian responses between repeated cycles using the same protocol was not explained by baseline FSH and AFC. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Infertile polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist protocol: role of hyperandrogenism
    Yang, Wan
    Yang, Rui
    Yang, Shuo
    Li, Jia
    Tu, Binbin
    Gao, Chang
    Wang, Ying
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 34 (08) : 715 - 718
  • [42] Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles
    Papanikolaou, EG
    Pozzobon, C
    Kolibianakis, EM
    Camus, M
    Tournaye, H
    Fatemi, HM
    Van Steirteghem, A
    Devroey, P
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 85 (01) : 112 - 120
  • [43] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist plus recombinant luteinizing hormone vs. a standard GnRH agonist short protocol in patients at risk for poor ovarian response
    De Placido, G
    Mollo, A
    Clarizia, R
    Strina, I
    Conforti, S
    Alviggi, C
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 85 (01) : 247 - 250
  • [44] The novel oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist relugolix is a new option for controlled ovarian stimulation cycles
    Komiya, Shinnosuke
    Tsuzuki-Nakao, Tomoko
    Asai, Yoshiko
    Inoue, Tomoko
    Morimoto, Yoshiharu
    Okada, Hidetaka
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 21 (01)
  • [45] Fixed Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol Versus Flexible Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Protocol in Patients With Asynchronous Follicular Development During Controlled Ovulation Stimulation: A Retrospective Study
    Dong, Mei
    Sun, Li
    Huang, Li
    Wang, Fang
    Zhang, Xiqian
    Liu, Fenghua
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [46] Novel follicular-phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist stimulation protocol for in vitro fertilization in the poor responder
    Frankfurter, David
    Dayal, Molina
    Dubey, Anil
    Peak, Douglas
    Gindoff, Paul
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 (05) : 1442 - 1445
  • [47] PLASMA GONADOTROPIN RESPONSE TO GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY HYPOGONADISM
    DONALD, RA
    ESPINER, EA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1974, 39 (02): : 364 - 369
  • [48] Optimal protocol for gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist use in ovarian stimulation
    Daya, S
    [J]. IN VITRO FERTILIZATION AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTION, 1997, : 405 - 410
  • [49] OVARIAN RESPONSE TO GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE IN POSTPARTUM DAIRY-COWS
    GARVERICK, HA
    ELMORE, RG
    VAILLANCOURT, DH
    SHARP, AJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1980, 41 (10) : 1582 - 1585
  • [50] Ovarian response after gonadotropin treatment of heifers immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone
    Bishop, DK
    Wettemann, RP
    Yelich, JV
    Spicer, LJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, 74 (05) : 1092 - 1097