Intercycle variability of the ovarian response in patients undergoing repeated stimulation with corifollitropin alfa in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol

被引:27
|
作者
Rombauts, Luk [1 ,2 ]
Lambalk, Cornelis B. [3 ]
Schultze-Mosgau, Askan [4 ]
van Kuijk, Jacqueline [5 ]
Verweij, Pierre [5 ]
Gates, Davis [6 ]
Gordon, Keith [6 ]
Griesinger, Georg [4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[2] Monash IVF, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Clin Schleswig Holstein, Dept Reprod Med & Gynecol Endocrinol, Lubeck, Germany
[5] MSD Oss NV, Oss, Netherlands
[6] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ USA
关键词
Corifollitropin alfa; GnRH antagonist; repeated ovarian stimulation; ovarian response; controlled ovarian stimulation; CONSECUTIVE CYCLES; HYPERSTIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether individual subject variation in ovarian response between repeated cycles with the same ovarian stimulation protocol can be predicted. Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: Multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial. Patient(s): Women aged 18-39 from a phase 3, open-label, uncontrolled trial with complete data across all cycles (n = 176). Intervention(s): Up to three cycles of a single injection of 150 mu g corifollitropin alfa for 7 days, then daily recombinant FSH/hMG until three follicles reached >= 17 mm. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist from stimulation day 5 until day of hCG administration. Main Outcome Measure(s): Numbers of follicles >= 11 mm on day of hCG in cycles 1-3, transition in ovarian response type between cycles from low (0-< 6), normal (6-<18), and high (>= 18), and serum FSH concentrations and antral follicle count (AFC) at each cycle start. Result(s): The mean (SD) numbers of follicles >= 11 mm on day of hCG were 13.4 (6.2), 13.3 (5.4), and 13.8 (6.4) in cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Between cycles 1 and 2, 11.9% switched from normal to low or high response, and 12.5% switched from low or high to normal response; 75.6% remained in the same category. Between cycles 2 and 3, 15.9% switched from normal to low or high response, and 10.2% switched from low or high to normal response; 73.9% remained in the same category. These shifts are symmetrical in nature, in that the percentage of subjects who shift from normal to low or high response is comparable to the percentage of subjects who shift from low or high to normal response. Baseline FSH and AFC did not significantly predict transition in ovarian response. Conclusion(s): The variability in ovarian responses between repeated cycles using the same protocol was not explained by baseline FSH and AFC. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI cycles
    Oehninger, Sergio
    Nelson, Scott M.
    Verweij, Pierre
    Stegmann, Barbara J.
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 13
  • [32] RESPONSE AFTER REPEATED GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE ADMINISTRATION IN HUMANS
    GARCIA, MD
    TRESGUERRES, JAF
    CORTES, J
    ORIOLBOSCH, A
    [J]. ACTA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 1975, 78 : 19 - 19
  • [33] Repeated in vitro fertilization cycle attempts in patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists
    Rabinson, Jacob
    Ashkenazi, Jacob
    Homburg, Roy
    Meltcer, Simion
    Anteby, Eyal Y.
    Orvieto, Raoul
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (04) : 1473 - 1475
  • [34] The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in a flexible protocol: A pilot study
    Mansour, RT
    Aboulghar, MA
    Serour, GI
    Al-Inany, HG
    Amin, YM
    Abou-Setta, AM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (02) : 444 - 446
  • [35] OVARIAN STIMULATION PROTOCOL FOR INVITRO FERTILIZATION WITH GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE AGONIST WIDENS THE IMPLANTATION WINDOW
    TURKASPA, I
    CONFINO, E
    DUDKIEWICZ, AB
    MYERS, SA
    FRIBERG, J
    GLEICHER, N
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1990, 53 (05) : 859 - 864
  • [36] Role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in the management of subfertile couples with intrauterine insemination and controlled ovarian stimulation
    Bakas, Panagiotis
    Konidaris, Sokratis
    Liapis, Angelos
    Gregoriou, Odyseas
    Tzanakaki, Despoina
    Creatsas, Georgios
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (06) : 2024 - 2028
  • [37] Added value today of hormonal measurements in ovarian stimulation in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist treatment cycle
    Popovic-Todorovic, Biljana
    Racca, Annalisa
    Blockeel, Christophe
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 30 (03) : 145 - 150
  • [38] Comparison of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and GnRH agonist flare-up regimen in poor responders undergoing ovarian stimulation
    Malmusi, S
    La Marca, A
    Giulini, S
    Xella, S
    Tagliasacchi, D
    Marsella, T
    Volpe, A
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 (02) : 402 - 406
  • [39] DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE TO GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING HORMONE STIMULATION IN INFERTILE MALES
    SCHNEIR, HS
    FANG, VS
    JONES, TM
    [J]. CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1979, 27 (04): : A681 - A681
  • [40] Comparison of cumulative live birth rates between progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in different populations
    Zhou, Ruiqiong
    Dong, Mei
    Huang, Li
    Wang, Songlu
    Fan, Lin
    Liang, Xiangping
    Zhang, Xiqian
    Liu, Fenghua
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14