Intercycle variability of the ovarian response in patients undergoing repeated stimulation with corifollitropin alfa in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol

被引:27
|
作者
Rombauts, Luk [1 ,2 ]
Lambalk, Cornelis B. [3 ]
Schultze-Mosgau, Askan [4 ]
van Kuijk, Jacqueline [5 ]
Verweij, Pierre [5 ]
Gates, Davis [6 ]
Gordon, Keith [6 ]
Griesinger, Georg [4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[2] Monash IVF, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Clin Schleswig Holstein, Dept Reprod Med & Gynecol Endocrinol, Lubeck, Germany
[5] MSD Oss NV, Oss, Netherlands
[6] Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ USA
关键词
Corifollitropin alfa; GnRH antagonist; repeated ovarian stimulation; ovarian response; controlled ovarian stimulation; CONSECUTIVE CYCLES; HYPERSTIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether individual subject variation in ovarian response between repeated cycles with the same ovarian stimulation protocol can be predicted. Design: Retrospective data analysis. Setting: Multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial. Patient(s): Women aged 18-39 from a phase 3, open-label, uncontrolled trial with complete data across all cycles (n = 176). Intervention(s): Up to three cycles of a single injection of 150 mu g corifollitropin alfa for 7 days, then daily recombinant FSH/hMG until three follicles reached >= 17 mm. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist from stimulation day 5 until day of hCG administration. Main Outcome Measure(s): Numbers of follicles >= 11 mm on day of hCG in cycles 1-3, transition in ovarian response type between cycles from low (0-< 6), normal (6-<18), and high (>= 18), and serum FSH concentrations and antral follicle count (AFC) at each cycle start. Result(s): The mean (SD) numbers of follicles >= 11 mm on day of hCG were 13.4 (6.2), 13.3 (5.4), and 13.8 (6.4) in cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Between cycles 1 and 2, 11.9% switched from normal to low or high response, and 12.5% switched from low or high to normal response; 75.6% remained in the same category. Between cycles 2 and 3, 15.9% switched from normal to low or high response, and 10.2% switched from low or high to normal response; 73.9% remained in the same category. These shifts are symmetrical in nature, in that the percentage of subjects who shift from normal to low or high response is comparable to the percentage of subjects who shift from low or high to normal response. Baseline FSH and AFC did not significantly predict transition in ovarian response. Conclusion(s): The variability in ovarian responses between repeated cycles using the same protocol was not explained by baseline FSH and AFC. (C) 2015 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intercycle variability of the ovarian response in patients undergoing repeated stimulation with corifollitropin alfa in a GnRH antagonist protocol
    Griesinger, G.
    Rombauts, L.
    Van Kuijk, J.
    Mannaerts, B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [2] Corifollitropin alfa is safe and efficacious in IVF patients undergoing repeated gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist ovarian stimulation cycles
    Rombauts, L.
    Heijnen, E.
    Marintcheva-Petrova, M.
    Elbers, J.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 : I242 - I243
  • [3] Repeated ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa in patients in a GnRH antagonist protocol: no concern for immunogenicity
    Norman, Robert J.
    Zegers-Hochschild, Fernando
    Salle, Bruno S.
    Elbers, Jolanda
    Heijnen, Esther
    Marintcheva-Petrova, Maya
    Mannaerts, Bernadette
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2011, 26 (08) : 2200 - 2208
  • [4] The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in ovarian stimulation
    Olivennes, F
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (01): : 12 - 22
  • [5] Impact of coasting in patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix
    Bahceci, M
    Ulug, U
    Tosun, S
    Erden, HF
    Bayazit, N
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 85 (05) : 1523 - 1525
  • [6] The gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol - the protocol of choice for the polycystic ovary syndrome patient undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation
    Kol, Shahar
    Homburg, Roy
    Alsbjerg, Birgit
    Humaidan, Peter
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 91 (06) : 643 - 647
  • [7] The effect of premature luteinizing hormone increases among high ovarian responders undergoing a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol
    Geng, Yudi
    Lai, Qiaohong
    Xun, Yang
    Jin, Lei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 142 (01) : 97 - 103
  • [8] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol: a novel method of ovarian stimulation in poor responders
    Nikolettos, N
    Al-Hasani, S
    Felberbaum, R
    Demirel, LC
    Kupker, W
    Montzka, P
    Xia, YX
    Schopper, B
    Sturm, R
    Diedrich, K
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2001, 97 (02): : 202 - 207
  • [9] Predictive factors for ovarian response in a corifollitropin alfa/GnRH antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation
    Oehninger, S.
    Nelson, S.
    Verweij, P.
    Stegmann, B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 343 - 344
  • [10] Large, comparative, randomized double-blind trial confirming noninferiority of pregnancy rates for corifollitropin alfa compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in older patients undergoing in vitro fertilization
    Boostanfar, Robert
    Shapiro, Bruce
    Levy, Michael
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    Witjes, Han
    Stegmann, Barbara J.
    Elbers, Jolanda
    Gordon, Keith
    Mannaerts, Bernadette
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (01) : 94 - +