Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: Accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

被引:91
|
作者
Engelke, Klaus [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Libanati, Cesar [4 ]
Liu, Yu [4 ]
Wang, Huei [4 ]
Austin, Matt [4 ]
Fuerst, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Stampa, Bernd [1 ,2 ]
Timm, Wolfram [1 ,2 ]
Genant, Harry K. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Synarc Inc, D-22087 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Synarc Inc, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Med Phys, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
[4] Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Quantitative computed tomography; Bone mineral density; Bone geometry; Distal radius; Osteoporosis; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; DISTAL RADIUS; SEGMENTATION METHOD; CLINICAL-USE; OSTEOPOROSIS; FRACTURES; STRENGTH; AGE; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.bone.2009.03.669
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) allows clinically relevant measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) at central and appendicular skeletal sites, but DXA has a limited ability to assess bone geometry and cannot distinguish between the Cortical and trabecular bone Compartments. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) can supplement DXA by enabling geometric and compartmental bone assessments. Whole-body spiral CT scanners are widely available and require only seconds per scan, in contrast to peripheral QCT scanners, which have restricted availability, limited spatial resolution, and require several minutes of scanning time. This study evaluated the accuracy and precision of whole-body spiral CT scanners for quantitatively assessing the distal radius, a common site of non-vertebral osteoporosis-related fractures, and compared the CT-measured densitometric values with those obtained from dual-energy-X-ray absorptiometry. Subjects and methods: A total of 161 postmenopausal women with baseline lumbar spine BMD T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5 underwent left forearm QCT using whole-body spiral CT scanners twice, I month apart. QCT volumes of interest were defined and analyzed at 3 specific radial regions: the ultradistal region by using slices at 8, 9, and 10 mm proximal to the ulnar styloid tip; the distal region by a slice 20 mm proximal; and the middle region by a slice 40 mm proximal, BMD, bone mineral content (BMC), volume, and average cortical thickness and circumference were measured. We evaluated QCT accuracy and precision and also report correlations between QCT and DXA for BMD and BMC Results: Overall accuracy and precision errors for BMD, BMC and volume were consistent with known skeletal QCT technology precision and were generally less than 3%. BMD and BMC assessed by QCT and DXA were Correlated (r = 0.55 to 0.80). Discussion: Whole-body spiral CT scanners allow densitometric evaluations of the distal radius with good accuracy and very good precision. This original and convenient method provides a tool to further investigate cortical and trabecular bone variables in the peripheral skeleton in osteoporotic patients. These assessments, coupled with evaluation of the effects on cortical and trabecular bone measured in response to therapies for osteoporosis, may advance our understanding of the contributors to non-vertebral fracture Occurrence. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 118
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy and precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition measurements in rhesus monkeys
    Black, A
    Tilmont, EM
    Baer, DJ
    Rumpler, DK
    Roth, GS
    Lane, MA
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PRIMATOLOGY, 2001, 30 (02) : 94 - 99
  • [22] WHOLE-BODY DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN CHILDREN, ADOLESCENTS AND YOUNG-ADULTS
    BRAILLON, PM
    COCHAT, P
    GIRAUD, S
    SALLE, BL
    DELMAS, PD
    MEUNIER, PJ
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1993, 8 : S291 - S291
  • [23] Whole and half-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis of body composition in obese adults
    Silverstein, W
    Stadler, D
    Peters, D
    Differding, J
    Karanja, N
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2006, 20 (04): : A165 - A165
  • [24] Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and ashing
    Ebbesen, EN
    Thomsen, JS
    Beck-Nielsen, H
    Nepper-Rasmussen, HJ
    Mosekilde, L
    BONE, 1999, 25 (06) : 713 - 724
  • [25] Radiological assessment of body composition in patients with cirrhosis: A comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography imaging
    Chew, M.
    Sinclair, M.
    Gow, P.
    Hey, P.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 : 63 - 63
  • [26] Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro
    Ebbesen, EN
    Thomsen, JS
    Beck-Nielsen, H
    Nepper-Rasmussen, HJ
    Mosekilde, L
    BONE, 1998, 23 (03) : 283 - 290
  • [27] Pediatric software for whole-body dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry: Changes in bone and body composition estimates
    Ellis, KJ
    Shypailo, RJ
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2001, 15 (05): : A1003 - A1003
  • [28] EARLY RESULTS OF LUMBAR DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY (DEXA) COMPARED WITH DUAL-ENERGY QUANTITATIVE COMPUTER-TOMOGRAPHY (DE-QCT)
    LINK, J
    ZWAAN, M
    WEISS, HD
    BORGIS, KJ
    BATGE, B
    FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1993, 158 (05): : 475 - 478
  • [29] Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)FAT mass using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
    Nunez, C
    Gallagher, D
    Wang, Z
    Pierson, RN
    Heymsfield, SB
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1997, 11 (03): : 3421 - 3421
  • [30] In vivo validation of whole-body composition estimates from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
    Prior, B
    Cureton, K
    Modlesky, C
    Evans, E
    Sloniger, M
    Saunders, M
    Lewis, R
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1997, 11 (03): : 3423 - 3423