Dosimetric Effect of Rotational Setup Errors in Single-Isocenter Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy of Multiple Brain Metastases

被引:19
|
作者
Selvan, Kasirajan Tamil [1 ,2 ]
Padma, Ganesan [1 ]
Revathy, Murugesan Kesavan [1 ]
Raj, N. Arunai Nambi [3 ]
Senthilnathan, K. [2 ]
Babu, P. Ramesh [2 ]
机构
[1] Apollo Canc Hosp, Dept Oncol, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
[2] Vellore Inst Technol Univ, Sch Adv Sci, Dept Phys, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Vellore Inst Technol Univ, Ctr Biomat Cellular & Mol Theranost, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Rotational errors; stereotactic radiosurgery; volumetric modulated arc therapy; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; RADIOTHERAPY; ACCURACY; RAPIDARC;
D O I
10.4103/jmp.JMP_103_18
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the dosimetric effects of rotational uncertainties in patient positioning on target coverage in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of multiple brain metastases using single isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Materials and Methods: Ten SRS cases with multiple brain metastases(2-8) planned with single isocenter non-coplanar VMAT technique were investigated in this study. Pitch, yaw and roll displacements of 1, 3 and 5 degrees were simulated about isocenter along each axes and nine plans were obtained for each case. Gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage obtained on simulated plans were compared with the original plan on four metrics of mean dose (Dmean), minimum dose to GTV (Dmin), dose to 95% of GTV (D95) and the volume covered by the 95% of the prescribed dose (V95). Results: At 1 degrees rotation about 4% of the PTV had V-95 and D95 values <95%. The minimum dose obtained across all PTV was 85.1% and there was not much change in the mean dose values obtained. The PTV volume which had V95 and D95 values <95% were in the range of 0.05 - 0.07cc and at a radial distance of 6.2 cm - 7.2 cm. At 3 degrees rotation almost 50% of the PTV had V95 and D95 values <95%. The minimum dose obtained across all PTV was 48.3% and the mean dose reduced to as low as 78.8%. At 5 degrees rotation almost 74% of the PTV had V95and D95 values <95%. The minimum dose obtained across all PTV was 21.2% and the mean dose reduced to as low as 49.2%. Conclusion: Our results indicate that correcting rotational uncertainties is critical in single-isocenter, multi-target SRS. For rotational deviations, radial distance of the target from isocenter along the respective axis has a strong influence on target coverage. For rotational setup deviation at a given radial distance larger targets tend to have lesser geometric miss compared to smaller targets. Mathematical model for spherical targets can be used to estimate V95 for given rotational errors.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 90
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric Impact of Patient Rotational Setup Errors with Frameless Single-Isocenter, Multi-Target Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases
    Clark, G. M.
    Fiveash, J. B.
    Prendergast, B. M.
    Willey, C. W.
    Spencer, S. A.
    Thomas, E. M.
    Guthrie, B. L.
    Popple, R. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S888 - S888
  • [2] Dosimetric Impact of Rotational Setup Errors on Multiple Brain Targets Treated with Single Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy
    Xue, J.
    No, D.
    Zhang, J.
    Wang, H.
    Barbee, D.
    Lymberis, S.
    Silverman, J.
    Das, I.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E615 - E615
  • [3] single-isocenter volumetric-modulated Dynamic WaveArc therapy in brain metastases
    Uto, M.
    Ogura, K.
    Miyabe, Y.
    Nakamura, M.
    Mukumoto, N.
    Hirashima, H.
    Katagiri, T.
    Takehana, K.
    Hiraoka, M.
    Mizowaki, T.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S1036 - S1037
  • [4] Single-isocenter volumetric-modulated Dynamic WaveArc therapy for two brain metastases
    Uto, Megumi
    Ogura, Kengo
    Mukumoto, Nobutaka
    Miyabe, Yuki
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Hirashima, Hideaki
    Katagiri, Tomohiro
    Takehana, Keiichi
    Hiraoka, Masahiro
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (08) : 619 - 625
  • [5] Dosimetric Comparison of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy and Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy in Three-fraction Single-isocenter Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases
    Turkkan, Gorkem
    Bilici, Nazli
    Sertel, Huseyin
    Tavli, Busra
    Ozkirim, Muge
    Fayda, Merdan
    [J]. TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 37 (01): : 67 - 73
  • [6] Single-isocenter volumetric-modulated Dynamic WaveArc therapy for two brain metastases
    Megumi Uto
    Kengo Ogura
    Nobutaka Mukumoto
    Yuki Miyabe
    Mitsuhiro Nakamura
    Hideaki Hirashima
    Tomohiro Katagiri
    Keiichi Takehana
    Masahiro Hiraoka
    Takashi Mizowaki
    [J]. Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2019, 37 : 619 - 625
  • [7] Single-Isocenter, Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases in a Single Session
    Knuthson, A. R.
    Widdel, L.
    Dial, C.
    Petit, J. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E267 - E267
  • [8] Dosimetric Effect of Setup Errors on Multiple Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiation Therapy for Craniospinal Axis
    Witztum, A.
    Mandeville, H. C.
    Saran, F. H.
    Smyth, G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S838 - S839
  • [9] Evaluation of the Displacement of the Target Position Caused by Residual Setup Errors in Stereotactic Radiosurgery with Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Multiple Brain Metastases
    Tsuruta, Y.
    Nakamura, M.
    Nakata, M.
    Hirashima, H.
    Zhou, D.
    Fujimoto, T.
    Takehana, K.
    Uto, M.
    Mizowaki, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [10] FEASIBILITY OF SINGLE-ISOCENTER VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC RADIOSURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE BRAIN METASTASES
    Clark, Grant M.
    Popple, Richard A.
    Young, P. Edward
    Fiveash, John B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (01): : 296 - 302