From ecosystems to ecosystem services: Stream restoration as ecological engineering

被引:129
|
作者
Palmer, Margaret A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Filoso, Solange [3 ]
Fanelli, Rosemary M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Entomol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Natl Socio Environm Synth Ctr SESYNC, Annapolis, MD 21401 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Ctr Environm Sci, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Solomons, MD 20688 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Marine Estuarine & Environm Sci Grad Program, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING | 2014年 / 65卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ecosystem services; Streams; Restoration; Stormwater; Ecological engineering; Nitrogen; Suspended sediment; RIVER RESTORATION; NITROGEN; WATER; BIODIVERSITY; COMMUNITIES; PRINCIPLES; SCIENCE; MARKETS; STORAGE; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.07.059
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem restoration was originally founded upon recovering ecosystems using wildlands as a reference state. More recently there has been interest in shifting to the restoration of ecosystem services - the benefits that natural systems can provide to humans. This shift is resulting in new restoration goals as well as new methodological approaches. The pace at which restoration goals and methods are changing is particularly fast for running-water ecosystems, which calls for a rigorous assessment of the environmental and economic costs and benefits associated with such changes. In this paper, we explore the environmental costs and benefits of an emerging form of urban stream restoration, in which ecosystems are vastly transformed in order to enhance specific ecosystem functions and support desirable services. These projects are usually implemented in highly incised low-order perennial, intermittent, or ephemeral stream reaches. In either case, the stream channel is transformed into a stormwater management structure designed to reduce peak flows and enhance hydraulic retention of stream flow with the goals of reducing bank erosion and promoting retention of nutrients and suspended sediments. Results to date indicate that this novel ecological design approach does modify the hydrologic responses of streams during some storm events, but there is no consistent pattern of nitrogen retention or removal that would lead to net annual benefits. While additional data are needed, results suggest there is the potential for sediment retention, at least during some flows. Ongoing work which includes monitoring both pre- and post-project implementation will help resolve this uncertainty. If sediment retention does occur, it is likely to decrease over time making the lifespan of these highly engineered projects is finite. Furthermore, environmental impacts associated with these projects can include loss or damage of riparian forests and export of sediment pulses during construction which may offset project benefits depending on their lifespan. Therefore, the use of approaches where entire existing ecosystems are modified to enhance a few specific biophysical processes should be limited to the most degraded systems where less invasive techniques, such as upland reforestation, reduced lawn fertilization, or better stormwater management at the source of runoff generation have first been exhausted. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 70
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] From genes to ecosystems: a genetic basis to ecosystem services
    Bailey, Joseph K.
    [J]. POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2011, 53 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [32] From stream to land: Ecosystem services provided by stream insects to agriculture
    Raitif, Julien
    Plantegenest, Manuel
    Roussel, Jean-Marc
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 270 : 32 - 40
  • [33] Influences of Ecological Restoration Programs on Ecosystem Services in Sandy Areas, Northern China
    Xu, Shixian
    Su, Yuan
    Yan, Wei
    Liu, Yuan
    Wang, Yonghui
    Li, Jiaxin
    Qian, Kaixuan
    Yang, Xiuyun
    Ma, Xiaofei
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [34] Biocultural restoration improves delivery of ecosystem services in social-ecological landscapes
    Sena, Pedro H. A.
    Goncalves-Souza, Thiago
    Goncalves, Paulo H. S.
    Ferreira, Paulo S. M.
    Gusmao, Reginaldo A. F.
    Melo, Felipe P. L.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2022, 30 (05)
  • [35] Integrating Ecology and Economics for Restoration: Using Ecological Indicators in Valuation of Ecosystem Services
    Schultz, Eric T.
    Johnston, Robert J.
    Segerson, Kathleen
    Besedin, Elena Y.
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2012, 20 (03) : 304 - 310
  • [36] Mapping heritage ecosystem services in ecological restoration areas: A case study from the East Cascades, Washington
    Helmer, Matthew
    Lipton, Jennifer
    Snitker, Grant
    Hackenberger, Steven
    Triplett, Mallory
    Cerveny, Lee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OUTDOOR RECREATION AND TOURISM-RESEARCH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 31
  • [37] Designed ecosystem services: application of ecological principles in wastewater treatment engineering
    Graham, DW
    Smith, VH
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 2 (04) : 199 - 206
  • [38] Wetland restoration and ecological engineering: International Conference of Wetland Restoration and Ecological Engineering
    Qin, Pei
    Mitsch, William J.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 35 (04) : 437 - 441
  • [39] Modifications of ecological trophic structures on chemical gradients in lotic ecosystems and their relations to stream ecosystem health
    An, Kwang-Guk
    Choi, Ji-Woong
    Lee, Yeong-Jun
    [J]. ANIMAL CELLS AND SYSTEMS, 2013, 17 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [40] Special section on ecological restoration of ecosystems
    Mendez-Toribio, Moises
    Gomez-Ruiz, Pilar A.
    [J]. ACTA BOTANICA MEXICANA, 2022, 129