Influence of Cushioning Variables in the Workplace and in the Family on the Probability of Suffering Stress

被引:2
|
作者
Gonzalo, David Cardenas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Burgos, Escuela Politecn Super, Burgos 09006, Spain
关键词
Bayesian networks; cushioning variables; European survey; stress; working conditions; SAFETY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.shaw.2016.02.003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Stress at work and in the family is a very common issue in our society that generates many health-related problems. During recent years, numerous studies have sought to define the term stress, raising many contradictions that various authors have studied. Other authors have attempted to establish some criteria, in subjective and not very quantitative ways, in an attempt to reduce and even to eliminate stressors and their effects at work and in the family context. The purpose of this study was to quantify so called cushioning variables, such as control, social support, home/work life conciliation, and even sports and leisure activities, with the purpose of, as much as possible, reducing the negative effects of stress, which seriously affects the health of workers. The study employs data from the Fifth European Working Conditions Survey, in which nearly 44,000 interviewees from 34 countries in the European Union participated. We constructed a probabilistic model based on a Bayesian network, using variables from both the workplace and the family, the aforementioned cushioning variables, as well as the variable stress. If action is taken on the above variables, then the probabilities of suffering high levels of stress may be reduced. Such action may improve the quality of life of people at work and in the family. (C) 2016, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. Published by Elsevier.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 184
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The influence of molecular variables on fatigue resistance in stress cracking environments
    Altstädt, V
    INTRINSIC MOLECULAR MOBILITY AND TOUGHNESS OF POLYMERS II, 2005, 188 : 105 - 152
  • [32] The influence of family origin and economic variables in land use and deforestation of family plots in Brazilian Amazonial
    Mattos, Luciano
    Brondizio, Eduardo
    Romeiro, Ademar
    Orair, Rodrigo
    NOVOS CADERNOS NAEA, 2010, 13 (02): : 27 - +
  • [33] An Investigation of the Variables That Influence Female Counselors' Work-Family Conflict
    Eckart, Emeline C.
    Ziomek-Daigle, Jolie
    JOURNAL OF EMPLOYMENT COUNSELING, 2019, 56 (02) : 50 - 68
  • [34] INFLUENCE OF FAMILY-STRUCTURE AND SCHOOL VARIABLES ON BEHAVIOR DISORDERS OF CHILDREN
    LINDHOLM, BW
    TOULIATOS, J
    RICH, A
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 1977, 14 (01) : 99 - 104
  • [35] Which variables influence the succession process in family farms? A literature review
    Rodriguez-Lizano, Victor
    Montero-Vega, Mercedes
    Sibelet, Nicole
    CAHIERS AGRICULTURES, 2020, 29
  • [36] HIGH-IMPACT VARIABLES THAT INFLUENCE FAMILY PERCEPTION OF ICU CARE
    Seman, Julie
    Stoudt, Gerald
    Burke, Ronald
    Saucier, Jason
    Collins, Tara
    Cole, Alyson
    Gabrielli, Andrea
    Martin, Niels
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01) : 402 - 402
  • [37] Influence of Family Variables on Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization: A Systematic Literature Review
    Lopez-Castro, Leticia
    Priegue, Diana
    SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (03):
  • [38] Influence of family variables on parental perception of their children's academic performance
    Alvarez Munoz, Jose Santiago
    Hernandez Prados, Ma Angeles
    Luisa Belmonte, Maria
    REVISTA INTERUNIVERSITARIA DE FORMACION DEL PROFESORADO-RIFOP, 2024, (99): : 253 - 272
  • [39] The influence of environmental variables on freshwater rotifers of the family Brachionidae and Lecanidae in Thailand
    Sa-ardrit, Phannee
    Pholpunthin, Pornsilp
    Segers, Hendrik
    Fontaneto, Diego
    TROPICAL ZOOLOGY, 2017, 30 (01) : 28 - 48
  • [40] SUBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS - THE INFLUENCE OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCE, FAMILY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL VARIABLES
    PELUCHETTE, JV
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 43 (02) : 198 - 208