Influence of Cushioning Variables in the Workplace and in the Family on the Probability of Suffering Stress

被引:2
|
作者
Gonzalo, David Cardenas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Burgos, Escuela Politecn Super, Burgos 09006, Spain
关键词
Bayesian networks; cushioning variables; European survey; stress; working conditions; SAFETY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.shaw.2016.02.003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Stress at work and in the family is a very common issue in our society that generates many health-related problems. During recent years, numerous studies have sought to define the term stress, raising many contradictions that various authors have studied. Other authors have attempted to establish some criteria, in subjective and not very quantitative ways, in an attempt to reduce and even to eliminate stressors and their effects at work and in the family context. The purpose of this study was to quantify so called cushioning variables, such as control, social support, home/work life conciliation, and even sports and leisure activities, with the purpose of, as much as possible, reducing the negative effects of stress, which seriously affects the health of workers. The study employs data from the Fifth European Working Conditions Survey, in which nearly 44,000 interviewees from 34 countries in the European Union participated. We constructed a probabilistic model based on a Bayesian network, using variables from both the workplace and the family, the aforementioned cushioning variables, as well as the variable stress. If action is taken on the above variables, then the probabilities of suffering high levels of stress may be reduced. Such action may improve the quality of life of people at work and in the family. (C) 2016, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. Published by Elsevier.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 184
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of Suffering in the Workplace in Health, Occupational Safety, and Professional Performance
    Ormaechea, Sheila Liberal
    Paredes, Cristina
    Gismera, Eduardo
    Sastre, Javier
    UCJC BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW, 2022, (75): : 62 - 103
  • [2] THE INFLUENCE OF MACROECONOMIC VARIABLES ON THE PROBABILITY OF UNION DECERTIFICATION
    AHLBURG, DA
    DWORKIN, JB
    JOURNAL OF LABOR RESEARCH, 1984, 5 (01) : 13 - 28
  • [3] Assessment and Modeling of the Influence of Age, Gender, and Family History of Hearing Problems on the Probability of Suffering Hearing Loss in the Working Population
    Barrero, Jesus P.
    Lopez-Perea, Eva M.
    Herrera, Sixto
    Mariscal, Miguel A.
    Garcia-Herrero, Susana
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) : 1 - 15
  • [4] Proposal for Monitoring the Stress Through the Sensing of Environmental Variables in a Workplace
    de Ramon-Fernandez, Alberto
    Ruiz-Fernandez, Daniel
    Marcos-Jorquera, Diego
    Gilart-Iglesias, Virgilio
    Soriano-Paya, Antonio
    UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING AND AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE, UCAMI 2017, 2017, 10586 : 250 - 255
  • [5] Psychosocial and Ergonomic Conditions at Work: Influence on the Probability of a Workplace Accident
    Lopez-Garcia, J. R.
    Garcia-Herrero, S.
    Gutierrez, J. M.
    Mariscal, M. A.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 2019
  • [6] Influence of personal and family variables on eating disorders
    Frieiro, Paula
    Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Ruben
    Dominguez Alonso, Jose
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE SALUD PUBLICA, 2021, 95
  • [7] Calculation of probability of suffering stress associated with problems of health across Bayesian networks
    Cardenas-Gonzalo, David
    DYNA, 2016, 91 (03): : 248 - 248
  • [8] Empathic response to animal suffering: Societal versus family influence
    Fidler, M
    Coleman, P
    Roberts, A
    ANTHROZOOS, 2000, 13 (01): : 48 - 51
  • [9] COPING WITH STRESS - THE INDIVIDUAL, THE FAMILY AND THE WORKPLACE - GERMAN - COOPER,CL
    SELLE, HJ
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE, 1988, 196 (04): : 444 - 444
  • [10] Family-to-work Spillover Stress: Coping Communicatively in the Workplace
    Krouse, S. S.
    Afifi, T. D.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY COMMUNICATION, 2007, 7 (02) : 85 - 122