A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer

被引:62
|
作者
Simillis, Constantinos [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Daniel L. H. [1 ,2 ]
Kontovounisios, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Pawa, Nikhil [1 ]
Brown, Gina [3 ]
Rasheed, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Tekkis, Paris P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
关键词
abdominoperineal excision; pelvic exenteration; rectal cancer; resection margin; survival; systematic review; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADICAL RESECTION; SURGERY; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001963
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess resection margin status and its impact on survival after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent rectal cancer. Summary of Background Data: Resection margin is important to guide therapy and to evaluate patient prognosis. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of resection margin status on survival, and a regression analysis to analyze positive resection margin rates reported in the literature. Results: The analysis included 111 studies reporting on 19,607 participants after abdominoperineal excision, and 30 studies reporting on 1326 participants after pelvic exenteration. The positive resection margin rates for abdominoperineal excision were 14.7% and 24.0% for pelvic exenteration. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly worse for patients with positive compared with negative resection margins after abdominoperineal excision [hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, P < 0.01; HR 3.70, P < 0.01, respectively] and after pelvic exenteration (HR 2.23, P < 0.01; HR 2.93, P < 0.01, respectively). For patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision with positive resection margins, the reported tumor sites were 57% anterior, 15% posterior, 10% left or right lateral, 8% circumferential, 10% unspecified. A significant decrease in positive resection margin rates was identified over time for abdominoperineal excision. Although positive resection margin rates did not significantly change with the size of the study, some small size studies reported higher than expected positive resection margin rates. Conclusions: Resection margin status influences survival and a multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers may result in reduced positive resection margins. For advanced anterior rectal cancer, posterior pelvic exenteration instead of abdominoperineal excision may improve resection margins.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal excision or extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a systematic review of the literature
    Balla, A.
    Batista Rodriguez, G.
    Buonomo, N.
    Martinez, C.
    Hernandez, P.
    Bollo, J.
    Targarona, E. M.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2017, 21 (05) : 329 - 336
  • [42] Perineal hernia repair after abdominoperineal excision or extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a systematic review of the literature
    A. Balla
    G. Batista Rodríguez
    N. Buonomo
    C. Martinez
    P. Hernández
    J. Bollo
    E. M. Targarona
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2017, 21 : 329 - 336
  • [43] Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer with biological mesh for pelvic floor reconstruction
    Ge, Wei
    Jiang, Song-song
    Qi, Wang
    Chen, Hao
    Zheng, Li-ming
    Chen, Gang
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (05) : 8818 - 8824
  • [44] Minimum radial margin in pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer
    Aiba, Toshisada
    Uehara, Kay
    Tsuyuki, Yuta
    Ogura, Atsushi
    Murata, Yuki
    Mizuno, Takashi
    Yamaguchi, Junpei
    Kokuryo, Toshio
    Yokoyama, Yukihiro
    Ebata, Tomoki
    EJSO, 2022, 48 (12): : 2502 - 2508
  • [45] Combined laparoscopic and transperineal total pelvic exenteration with en bloc resection of urethra for recurrent rectal cancer following robotic abdominoperineal resection - A video vignette
    Kawada, Kenji
    Itatani, Yoshiro
    Masui, Kimihiko
    Tsuge, Itaru
    Kawamoto, Kazuyuki
    Obama, Kazutaka
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 25 (11) : 2270 - 2271
  • [46] Urinary Diversion After Total Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer
    Donald G. Skinner
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 1999, 6 : 717 - 718
  • [47] Quality of Life of Survivors After Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer
    Austin, Kirk K. S.
    Young, Jane M.
    Solomon, Michael J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (08) : 1121 - 1126
  • [48] Urinary diversion after total pelvic exenteration for rectal cancer
    Russo P.
    Ravindran B.
    Katz J.
    Paty P.
    Guillem J.
    Cohen A.M.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 1999, 6 (8) : 732 - 738
  • [49] Does Pelvic Radiotherapy Affect Genitourinary Function in Patients After Abdominoperineal Resection for Distal Rectal Cancer?
    Kasparek, Michael S.
    Hassan, Imran
    Cima, Robert R.
    Larson, Dirk R.
    Gullerud, Rachel E.
    Wolff, Bruce G.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 140 (05) : S1012 - S1013
  • [50] Differences in circumferential resection margin involvement after abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection no longer significant
    Van Leersum, N.
    Martijnse, I.
    Dulk, M.
    Kolfschoten, N. E.
    Le Cessie, S.
    Van de Velde, C. J.
    Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.
    Wouters, M. W. J. M.
    Rutten, H. J. T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S480 - S480