A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer

被引:62
|
作者
Simillis, Constantinos [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Daniel L. H. [1 ,2 ]
Kontovounisios, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Pawa, Nikhil [1 ]
Brown, Gina [3 ]
Rasheed, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Tekkis, Paris P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
关键词
abdominoperineal excision; pelvic exenteration; rectal cancer; resection margin; survival; systematic review; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADICAL RESECTION; SURGERY; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001963
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess resection margin status and its impact on survival after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent rectal cancer. Summary of Background Data: Resection margin is important to guide therapy and to evaluate patient prognosis. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of resection margin status on survival, and a regression analysis to analyze positive resection margin rates reported in the literature. Results: The analysis included 111 studies reporting on 19,607 participants after abdominoperineal excision, and 30 studies reporting on 1326 participants after pelvic exenteration. The positive resection margin rates for abdominoperineal excision were 14.7% and 24.0% for pelvic exenteration. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly worse for patients with positive compared with negative resection margins after abdominoperineal excision [hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, P < 0.01; HR 3.70, P < 0.01, respectively] and after pelvic exenteration (HR 2.23, P < 0.01; HR 2.93, P < 0.01, respectively). For patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision with positive resection margins, the reported tumor sites were 57% anterior, 15% posterior, 10% left or right lateral, 8% circumferential, 10% unspecified. A significant decrease in positive resection margin rates was identified over time for abdominoperineal excision. Although positive resection margin rates did not significantly change with the size of the study, some small size studies reported higher than expected positive resection margin rates. Conclusions: Resection margin status influences survival and a multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers may result in reduced positive resection margins. For advanced anterior rectal cancer, posterior pelvic exenteration instead of abdominoperineal excision may improve resection margins.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RATE AND TREATMENT OF PELVIC RECURRENCE AFTER ABDOMINOPERINEAL RESECTION AND LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION FOR RECTAL-CANCER
    NYMANN, T
    JESS, P
    CHRISTIANSEN, J
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1995, 38 (08) : 799 - 802
  • [22] Biologic Mesh Reconstruction of the Pelvic Floor after Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: A Systematic Review
    Alam, Nasra N.
    Narang, Sunil K.
    Koeckerling, Ferdinand
    Daniels, Ian R.
    Smart, Neil J.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2016, 3
  • [23] Abdominoperineal excision with prostatectomy in T4 rectal cancer - bladder-sparing robotic pelvic exenteration - a video vignette
    Raj Kumar, B.
    Bankar, S.
    Pandey, D.
    Rohila, J.
    Prakash, G.
    Bakshi, G.
    deSouza, A.
    Saklani, A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2020, 22 (11) : 1786 - 1787
  • [24] Perineal Wound Healing After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bobkiewicz, Adam
    Banasiewicz, Tomasz
    Krokowicz, Lukasz
    Paszkowski, Jacek
    Hermann, Jacek
    Malinger, Stanislaw
    Drews, Michal
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2015, 58 (02) : E18 - E18
  • [25] Perineal Wound Healing After Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Musters, Gijsbert D.
    Buskens, Christianne J.
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2014, 57 (09) : 1129 - 1139
  • [26] Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin
    Wang, Lin
    Gu, Guo-Li
    Li, Zhong-Wu
    Peng, Yi-Fan
    Gu, Jin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (27) : 9138 - 9145
  • [27] Abdominoperineal excision following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: Unfavorable prognosis even with negative circumferential resection margin
    Lin Wang
    Guo-Li Gu
    Zhong-Wu Li
    Yi-Fan Peng
    Jin Gu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 20 (27) : 9138 - 9145
  • [28] Total Pelvic Exenteration with Presacral Fascia and Pelvic Musculature Excision for Pelvic Recurrence of Rectal Cancer
    Wang, Anqi
    Zhang, Peng
    Zang, Jia
    Zhang, Xu
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhou, Haiyang
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 32 (04) : 2308 - 2309
  • [29] Extended abdominoperineal excision vs. standard abdominoperineal excision in rectal cancer-a systematic overview
    Stelzner, Sigmar
    Koehler, Carsta
    Stelzer, Juliane
    Sims, Anja
    Witzigmann, Helmut
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 26 (10) : 1227 - 1240
  • [30] Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision
    Tilney, Henry S.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    Sains, Parvinder S.
    Constantinides, Vasilis A.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (01) : 29 - 36