A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer

被引:62
|
作者
Simillis, Constantinos [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Daniel L. H. [1 ,2 ]
Kontovounisios, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Pawa, Nikhil [1 ]
Brown, Gina [3 ]
Rasheed, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Tekkis, Paris P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
关键词
abdominoperineal excision; pelvic exenteration; rectal cancer; resection margin; survival; systematic review; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADICAL RESECTION; SURGERY; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001963
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess resection margin status and its impact on survival after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent rectal cancer. Summary of Background Data: Resection margin is important to guide therapy and to evaluate patient prognosis. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of resection margin status on survival, and a regression analysis to analyze positive resection margin rates reported in the literature. Results: The analysis included 111 studies reporting on 19,607 participants after abdominoperineal excision, and 30 studies reporting on 1326 participants after pelvic exenteration. The positive resection margin rates for abdominoperineal excision were 14.7% and 24.0% for pelvic exenteration. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly worse for patients with positive compared with negative resection margins after abdominoperineal excision [hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, P < 0.01; HR 3.70, P < 0.01, respectively] and after pelvic exenteration (HR 2.23, P < 0.01; HR 2.93, P < 0.01, respectively). For patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision with positive resection margins, the reported tumor sites were 57% anterior, 15% posterior, 10% left or right lateral, 8% circumferential, 10% unspecified. A significant decrease in positive resection margin rates was identified over time for abdominoperineal excision. Although positive resection margin rates did not significantly change with the size of the study, some small size studies reported higher than expected positive resection margin rates. Conclusions: Resection margin status influences survival and a multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers may result in reduced positive resection margins. For advanced anterior rectal cancer, posterior pelvic exenteration instead of abdominoperineal excision may improve resection margins.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Circumferential resection margin involvement after laparoscopic abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Raftopoulos, I.
    Reed, J. F., III
    Bergamaschi, R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (04) : 431 - 437
  • [2] Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Yang, Timothy X.
    Morris, David L.
    Chua, Terence C.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (04) : 519 - 531
  • [3] A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era
    How, P.
    Shihab, O.
    Tekkis, P.
    Brown, Gina
    Quirke, P.
    Heald, R.
    Moran, B.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2011, 20 (04): : E149 - E155
  • [4] VRAM Flap for Pelvic Floor Reconstruction after Pelvic Exenteration and Abdominoperineal Excision
    Faur, Ionut Flaviu
    Clim, Adelina
    Dobrescu, Amadeus
    Prodan, Catalin
    Hajjar, Rami
    Pasca, Paul
    Capitanio, Marco
    Tarta, Cristi
    Isaic, Alexandru
    Noditi, George
    Nati, Ionel
    Totolici, Bogdan
    Duta, Ciprian
    Lazar, Gabriel
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [5] Reconstructions of Perineal Defects After Abdominoperineal Resection or Pelvic Exenteration
    Aladashvili, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S414 - S415
  • [6] Perineal Wound Closure Following Abdominoperineal Resection and Pelvic Exenteration for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Buscail, Etienne
    Canivet, Cindy
    Shourick, Jason
    Chantalat, Elodie
    Carrere, Nicolas
    Duffas, Jean-Pierre
    Philis, Antoine
    Berard, Emilie
    Buscail, Louis
    Ghouti, Laurent
    Chaput, Benoit
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 15
  • [7] Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Peer Wille-Jørgensen
    Bo Pilsgaard
    Peter Møller
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2009, 24 : 323 - 325
  • [8] Pelvic floor reconstruction with biomesh after abdominoperineal extendend excision for rectal cancer?
    Pioch, V.
    Wolff, K.
    Marti, L.
    Gingert, C.
    Adamina, M.
    Hetzer, F. H.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2010, 140 : 24S - 24S
  • [9] Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer
    Wille-Jorgensen, Peer
    Pilsgaard, Bo
    Moller, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 24 (03) : 323 - 325
  • [10] OMISSION OF PELVIC PERITONEAL CLOSURE AFTER ABDOMINOPERINEAL RECTAL EXCISION
    FASTH, S
    HULTEN, L
    OJERSKOG, B
    ANNALES CHIRURGIAE ET GYNAECOLOGIAE, 1977, 66 (04) : 181 - 183