Spousal diabetes as a diabetes risk factor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:81
|
作者
Leong, Aaron [1 ,3 ]
Rahme, Elham [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dasgupta, Kaberi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Res Inst, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Div Clin Epidemiol, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
来源
BMC MEDICINE | 2014年 / 12卷
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Diabetes mellitus; Prediabetes; Spouses concordance; Risk factor; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY LEVELS; METABOLIC SYNDROME; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; MARRIED-COUPLES; US POPULATION; FOLLOW-UP; TYPE-2; PREVALENCE; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1186/1741-7015-12-12
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Diabetes history in biologically-related individuals increases diabetes risk. We assessed diabetes concordance in spouses (that is, biologically unrelated family members) to gauge the importance of socioenvironmental factors. Methods: We selected cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies examining spousal association for diabetes and/or prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance), indexed in Medline, Embase or Scopus (1 January 1997 to 28 February 2013). Effect estimates (that is, odds ratios, incidence rate ratios, and so on) with body mass index (BMI) adjustment were pooled separately from those without BMI adjustment (random effects models) to distinguish BMI-dependent and independent concordance. Results: Searches yielded 2,705 articles; six were retained (n = 75,498 couples) for systematic review and five for meta-analysis. Concordance was lowest in a study that relied on women's reports of diabetes in themselves and their spouses (effect estimate 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.30) and highest in a study with systematic assessment of glucose tolerance (2.11, 95% CI 1.74 to 5.10). The random-effects pooled estimate adjusted for age and other covariates but not BMI was 1.26 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.45). The estimate with BMI adjustment was lower (1.18, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.40). Two studies assessing between-spouse associations of diabetes/prediabetes determined by glucose testing reported high concordance (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.37 without BMI adjustment; 2.32, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.98 with BMI adjustment). Two studies did not distinguish type 1 and type 2 diabetes. However given that around 95% of adults is type 2, this is unlikely to have influenced the results. Conclusions: Our pooled estimate suggests that a spousal history of diabetes is associated with a 26% diabetes risk increase. Recognizing shared risk between spouses may improve diabetes detection and motivate couples to increase collaborative efforts to optimize eating and physical activity habits.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The risk of tooth loss in patients with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Weijdijk, Lotte P. M.
    Ziukaite, Laura
    Van der Weijden, G. A.
    Bakker, Eric W. P.
    Slot, Dagmar Else
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL HYGIENE, 2022, 20 (01) : 145 - 166
  • [32] Adverse childhood experiences and risk of diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Siyu
    Shan, Shiyi
    Liu, Wen
    Li, Shuting
    Hou, Leying
    Huang, Xuanyin
    Liu, Yi
    Yi, Qian
    Sun, Weidi
    Tang, Kun
    Adeloye, Davies
    Rudan, Igor
    Song, Peige
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 12
  • [33] Topical corticosteroids and risk of diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Phan, Kevin
    Smith, Saxon D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2021, 32 (03) : 345 - 349
  • [34] Preexisting diabetes in pregnancy and risk of hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahya, Hasan
    Ramon, Ryan
    Setiawan, Muhammad Rifki
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 : 87 - 88
  • [35] Diabetes and Risk of Surgical Site Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Martin, Emily T.
    Kaye, Keith S.
    Knott, Caitlin
    Huong Nguyen
    Santarossa, Maressa
    Evans, Richard
    Bertran, Elizabeth
    Jaber, Linda
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 37 (01): : 88 - 99
  • [36] Topical corticosteroids and risk of diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Phan, Kevin
    Smith, Saxon D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 83 (06) : AB111 - AB111
  • [37] Diabetes mellitus and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Ping
    Kang, Donghong
    Cao, Wei
    Wang, Yan
    Liu, Zhiwen
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2012, 28 (02) : 109 - 122
  • [38] Maternal height and risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arafa, Ahmed
    Dong, Jia-Yi
    [J]. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2019, 56 (07) : 723 - 728
  • [39] CARING: Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Cancer - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Starup-Linde, Jakob
    Vestergaard, Peter
    Karlstad, Oystein
    Eriksen, Stine A.
    Bronsveld, Heleen K.
    De Vries, Frank
    De Boer, Anthonius
    De Bruin, Marie L.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 : 402 - 403
  • [40] Maternal height and risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ahmed Arafa
    Jia-Yi Dong
    [J]. Acta Diabetologica, 2019, 56 : 723 - 728