Spousal diabetes as a diabetes risk factor: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:81
|
作者
Leong, Aaron [1 ,3 ]
Rahme, Elham [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dasgupta, Kaberi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Res Inst, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Div Clin Epidemiol, Ctr Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A1, Canada
来源
BMC MEDICINE | 2014年 / 12卷
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Diabetes mellitus; Prediabetes; Spouses concordance; Risk factor; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY LEVELS; METABOLIC SYNDROME; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; MARRIED-COUPLES; US POPULATION; FOLLOW-UP; TYPE-2; PREVALENCE; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1186/1741-7015-12-12
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Diabetes history in biologically-related individuals increases diabetes risk. We assessed diabetes concordance in spouses (that is, biologically unrelated family members) to gauge the importance of socioenvironmental factors. Methods: We selected cross-sectional, case-control and cohort studies examining spousal association for diabetes and/or prediabetes (impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance), indexed in Medline, Embase or Scopus (1 January 1997 to 28 February 2013). Effect estimates (that is, odds ratios, incidence rate ratios, and so on) with body mass index (BMI) adjustment were pooled separately from those without BMI adjustment (random effects models) to distinguish BMI-dependent and independent concordance. Results: Searches yielded 2,705 articles; six were retained (n = 75,498 couples) for systematic review and five for meta-analysis. Concordance was lowest in a study that relied on women's reports of diabetes in themselves and their spouses (effect estimate 1.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.30) and highest in a study with systematic assessment of glucose tolerance (2.11, 95% CI 1.74 to 5.10). The random-effects pooled estimate adjusted for age and other covariates but not BMI was 1.26 (95% CI 1.08 to 1.45). The estimate with BMI adjustment was lower (1.18, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.40). Two studies assessing between-spouse associations of diabetes/prediabetes determined by glucose testing reported high concordance (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.55 to 2.37 without BMI adjustment; 2.32, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.98 with BMI adjustment). Two studies did not distinguish type 1 and type 2 diabetes. However given that around 95% of adults is type 2, this is unlikely to have influenced the results. Conclusions: Our pooled estimate suggests that a spousal history of diabetes is associated with a 26% diabetes risk increase. Recognizing shared risk between spouses may improve diabetes detection and motivate couples to increase collaborative efforts to optimize eating and physical activity habits.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Miscarriage, stillbirth and the risk of diabetes in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    You, Qiqi
    Jiang, Qingqing
    Shani, Irakoze
    Lou, Yiling
    Huang, Shen
    Wang, Shiqi
    Cao, Shiyi
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 195
  • [22] Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and risk of diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schwingshackl, Lukas
    Missbach, Benjamin
    Koenig, Juergen
    Hoffmann, Georg
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2015, 18 (07) : 1292 - 1299
  • [23] ANTIDEPRESSANT USE AND THE RISK OF INCIDENT DIABETES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bhattacharjee, S.
    Bhattacharya, R.
    Kelley, G.
    Sambamoorthi, U.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A159 - A159
  • [24] CARING: diabetes mellitus and risk of cancer - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Starup-Linde, J.
    Vestergaard, P.
    Karlstad, O.
    Eriksen, S. A.
    Bronsveld, H. K.
    de Vries, F.
    de Boer, A.
    de Bruin, M. L.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2013, 56 : S183 - S183
  • [25] Diabetes and Risk of Parkinson's Disease A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cereda, Emanuele
    Barichella, Michela
    Pedrolli, Carlo
    Klersy, Catherine
    Cassani, Erica
    Caccialanza, Riccardo
    Pezzoli, Gianni
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 (12) : 2614 - 2623
  • [26] Hepatitis C infection and risk of diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    White, Donna L.
    Ratziu, Vlad
    El-Serag, Hashem B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 49 (05) : 831 - 844
  • [27] Depression and risk of mortality in individuals with diabetes: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Park, Mijung
    Katon, Wayne J.
    Wolf, Fredric M.
    [J]. GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 35 (03) : 217 - 225
  • [28] Built environmental characteristics and diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    den Braver, N. R.
    Lakerveld, J.
    Rutters, F.
    Schoonmade, L. J.
    Brug, J.
    Beulens, J. W. J.
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2017, 60 : S165 - S165
  • [29] Schizophrenia and type 2 diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dong, Kai
    Wang, Shenghai
    Qu, Chunhui
    Zheng, Kewei
    Sun, Ping
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [30] Diabetes and risk of physical disability in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wong, Evelyn
    Backholer, Kathryn
    Gearon, Emma
    Harding, Jessica
    Freak-Poli, Rosanne
    Stevenson, Christopher
    Peeters, Anna
    [J]. LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 1 (02): : 106 - 114