Increased Need for Right Ventricular Support in Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiomyopathy Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support

被引:79
|
作者
Oliveira, Guilherme H. [1 ]
Dupont, Matthias [2 ]
Naftel, David [3 ]
Myers, Susan L. [3 ]
Yuan, Ya [3 ]
Tang, W. H. Wilson [1 ]
Gonzalez-Stawinski, Gonzalo [4 ]
Young, James B. [1 ]
Taylor, David O. [1 ]
Starling, Randall C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Harrington Heart & Vasc Inst, Adv Heart Failure & Transplantat Ctr,Sch Med, Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr,Div Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Cardiol, Genk, Belgium
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Baylor Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
BIVENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; RIGHT HEART-FAILURE; DESTINATION THERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; DOXORUBICIN; TRANSPLANTATION; IMPLANTATION; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; TRASTUZUMAB;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.040
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the use of durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy (CCMP) and determine their outcomes and survival in comparison to that of other patients with end-stage heart failure treated similarly. Background Patients with end-stage heart failure as a result of CCMP from anthracyclines are often precluded from heart transplantation because of a history of cancer. In such patients, durable MCS may offer an important chance for life prolongation. Yet, there are no data to support the use of MCS in this increasingly prevalent group of patients. Methods We searched 3,812 MCS patients from June 2006 through March 2011 in the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) database for the diagnosis of CCMP. We compared characteristics, outcomes, and survival between CCMP patients and patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Results Compared with patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy, patients with CCMP were overwhelmingly female (72% vs. 24% vs. 13%, p = 0.001), had MCS more often implanted as destination therapy (33% vs. 14% vs. 22%, p = 0.03), required more right ventricular assist device support (19% vs. 11% vs. 6%, p = 0.006), and had a higher risk of bleeding (p = 0001). Survival of CCMP patients was similar to that of other groups. Conclusions CCMP patients treated with MCS have survival similar to other MCS patients despite more frequent need for right ventricular assist device support and increased bleeding risk. (1 Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:240-8) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 248
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intraoperative Hemodynamics and Need for Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Combined Heart-liver Transplantation
    Wu, Wei Kelly
    Ziogas, Ioannis
    Mishra, Kelly
    Siegrist, Kara
    Matsuoka, Lea
    Menachem, Jonathan
    Izzy, Manhal
    Shingina, Alexandra
    Do, Nhue
    Bacchetta, Matthew
    Shah, Ashish
    Alexopoulos, Sophoclis
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (01) : S67 - S68
  • [42] MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK DUE TO ACUTE RIGHT VENTRICULAR FAILURE
    McLenon, Melissa
    Pham, Si
    Kon, Zachary
    Herr, Daniel
    Sorensen, Erik
    Rector, Ray
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12)
  • [43] Mechanical circulatory support for acute right ventricular failure in the setting of pulmonary embolism
    Elder, Mahir
    Blank, Nimrod
    Kaki, Amir
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    Grines, Cindy L.
    Kajy, Marvin
    Hasan, Reema
    Mohamad, Tamam
    Schreiber, Theodore
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (04) : 518 - 524
  • [44] Pragmatic approach to temporary mechanical circulatory support in acute right ventricular failure
    Carnicelli, Anthony P.
    van Diepen, Sean
    Gage, Ann
    Bernhardt, Alexander M.
    Cowger, Jennifer
    Houston, Brian A.
    Siuba, Matt T.
    Kataria, Rachna
    Beavers, Craig J.
    John, Kevin J.
    Meyns, Bart
    Kapur, Navin K.
    Tedford, Ryan J.
    Kanwar, Manreet
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 43 (11): : 1894 - 1904
  • [45] Mechanical circulatory support for the right ventricle in combination with a left ventricular assist device
    Shimada, Shogo
    Nawata, Kan
    Kinoshita, Osamu
    Ono, Minoru
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (08) : 663 - 673
  • [46] Mechanical circulatory support for the right ventricle in the setting of a left ventricular assist device
    Steffen, Robert J.
    Halbreiner, M. Scott
    Zhang, Li
    Fukamachi, Kiyotaka
    Soltesz, Edward G.
    Starling, Randall C.
    Moazami, Nader
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2014, 11 (06) : 587 - 593
  • [47] Success of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Treatment in Acute Right Ventricular Failure
    Zahedi, S.
    Parsons, A.
    Vahabzadeh, A.
    Franco-Palacios, D. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [48] Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Familial Dilated Cardiomyopathy
    Shetty, Naman S.
    Parcha, Vibhu
    Hasnie, Ammar
    Pandey, Ambarish
    Arora, Garima
    Arora, Pankaj
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [49] MECHANICAL VENTRICULAR MASSAGE - METHOD FOR CIRCULATORY SUPPORT
    BROBMANN, GF
    MIKOSCH, H
    SPRINGORUM, HW
    THOMAS, C
    KRUSEJAR.J
    EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1973, 5 : 95 - 95
  • [50] Characteristics and survival of patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy undergoing heart transplantation
    Oliveira, Guilherme H.
    Hardaway, Brian W.
    Kucheryavaya, Anna Y.
    Stehlik, Josef
    Edwards, Leah B.
    Taylor, David O.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 31 (08): : 805 - 810