Increased Need for Right Ventricular Support in Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiomyopathy Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support

被引:79
|
作者
Oliveira, Guilherme H. [1 ]
Dupont, Matthias [2 ]
Naftel, David [3 ]
Myers, Susan L. [3 ]
Yuan, Ya [3 ]
Tang, W. H. Wilson [1 ]
Gonzalez-Stawinski, Gonzalo [4 ]
Young, James B. [1 ]
Taylor, David O. [1 ]
Starling, Randall C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Harrington Heart & Vasc Inst, Adv Heart Failure & Transplantat Ctr,Sch Med, Univ Hosp Case Med Ctr,Div Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Cardiol, Genk, Belgium
[3] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[4] Baylor Med Ctr, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
BIVENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE; RIGHT HEART-FAILURE; DESTINATION THERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; DOXORUBICIN; TRANSPLANTATION; IMPLANTATION; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; TRASTUZUMAB;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.040
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the use of durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy (CCMP) and determine their outcomes and survival in comparison to that of other patients with end-stage heart failure treated similarly. Background Patients with end-stage heart failure as a result of CCMP from anthracyclines are often precluded from heart transplantation because of a history of cancer. In such patients, durable MCS may offer an important chance for life prolongation. Yet, there are no data to support the use of MCS in this increasingly prevalent group of patients. Methods We searched 3,812 MCS patients from June 2006 through March 2011 in the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) database for the diagnosis of CCMP. We compared characteristics, outcomes, and survival between CCMP patients and patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Results Compared with patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy, patients with CCMP were overwhelmingly female (72% vs. 24% vs. 13%, p = 0.001), had MCS more often implanted as destination therapy (33% vs. 14% vs. 22%, p = 0.03), required more right ventricular assist device support (19% vs. 11% vs. 6%, p = 0.006), and had a higher risk of bleeding (p = 0001). Survival of CCMP patients was similar to that of other groups. Conclusions CCMP patients treated with MCS have survival similar to other MCS patients despite more frequent need for right ventricular assist device support and increased bleeding risk. (1 Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:240-8) 2014 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 248
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Switching to Impella 5.0 Decreases Need for Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Castro, L.
    Zipfel, S.
    Soeffker, G.
    Lubos, E.
    Rybczniski, M.
    Grahn, H.
    Schrage, B.
    Gebauer, A.
    Barten, M. J.
    Westermann, D.
    Reichenspurner, H.
    Bernhardt, A. M.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (04): : S410 - S410
  • [32] Switching to Impella 5.0 Decreases Need for Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Castro, L.
    Zipfel, S.
    Soeffker, G.
    Grahn, H.
    Schrage, B.
    Schrage, B.
    Barten, M.
    Westermann, D.
    Reichenspurner, H.
    Bernhardt, A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 39 (04): : S419 - S419
  • [33] Switching to Impella 5.0 decreases need for transfusion in patients undergoing temporary mechanical circulatory support
    Castro, Liesa
    Zipfel, Svante
    Braunsteiner, Josephine
    Schaefer, Andreas
    Sill, Bjorn
    Soffker, Gerold
    Kluge, Stefan
    Lubos, Edith
    Rybczinski, Meike
    Grahn, Hanno
    Schrage, Benedikt
    Becher, Peter M.
    Barten, Markus J.
    Westermann, Dirk
    Blankenberg, Stefan
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    Bernhardt, Alexer M.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 57 : 253 - 258
  • [34] Mechanical circulatory support in ventricular arrhythmias
    Tavazzi, Guido
    Dammassa, Valentino
    Colombo, Costanza Natalia Julia
    Arbustini, Eloisa
    Castelein, Thomas
    Balik, Martin
    Vandenbriele, Christophe
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [35] Perioperative management of patients with undergoing durable mechanical circulatory support
    Hulde, Nikolai
    Koster, Andreas
    von Dossow, Vera
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (13)
  • [36] Echocardiography in Weaning Right Ventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support: Are We Measuring the Right Stuff?
    Roscoe, Andrew
    Zochios, Vasileios
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2022, 36 (02) : 362 - 366
  • [37] DCM Support: cell therapy and circulatory support for dilated cardiomyopathy patients with severe ventricular impairment
    Reid, Alice
    Hussain, Mohsin
    Veerapen, Jessry
    Ramaseshan, Rohini
    Hall, Russell
    Bowles, Ruth
    Jones, Daniel A.
    Mathur, Anthony
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2023, 10 (04): : 2664 - 2671
  • [38] Characterization of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy
    Bakir, Nadia H.
    Florea, Ioana B.
    Schilling, Joel D.
    Ewald, Gregory A.
    Kotkar, Kunal D.
    Itoh, Akinobu
    Masood, Muhammad F.
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [39] Increased risk of Cerebrovascular Death in Patients with Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiomyopathy
    Mehanna, Emile
    Al-Kindi, Sadeer G.
    Ige, Mobolaji
    Kumar, Sachin
    Kattea, Mohammad
    ElAmm, Chantal
    Deo, Salil
    Benatti, Rodolfo D.
    Ginwalla, Mahazarin
    Park, Soon J.
    Oliveira, Guilherme H.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2015, 21 (08) : S61 - S62
  • [40] Nutrition support for patients on mechanical circulatory support
    Dresen, Ellen
    Modir, Ranna
    Stoppe, Christian
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 37 (01) : 24 - 34