Subject-specific characteristics of instructional quality in mathematics education

被引:45
|
作者
Schlesinger, Lena [1 ]
Jentsch, Armin [1 ]
Kaiser, Gabriele [1 ,2 ]
Koenig, Johannes [3 ]
Blomeke, Sigrid [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Fac Educ, Math Educ, Von Melle Pk 8, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Australian Catholic Univ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Oslo, Ctr Educ Measurement CEMO, Oslo, Norway
来源
ZDM-MATHEMATICS EDUCATION | 2018年 / 50卷 / 03期
关键词
Instructional quality; Subject-specific aspects; High-inference ratings; Standardized classroom observations; Mathematics education; CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS; KNOWLEDGE; TEACHERS; DESIGN; SCHOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s11858-018-0917-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Instructional research in German-speaking countries has conceptualized teaching quality recently according to three generic dimensions, namely, classroom management, student support and cognitive activation. However, as these dimensions are mainly regarded as generic, subject-specific aspects of mathematics instruction, e.g., the mathematical depth of argumentation or the adequacy of concept introductions, are not covered in depth. Therefore, a new instrument for the analysis of instructional quality was developed, which extended this three-dimensional framework by relevant subject-specific aspects of instructional quality. In this paper, the newly developed observational protocol is applied to three videotaped mathematics lessons from the NCTE video library of Harvard University to explore strengths and weaknesses of this instrument, and to examine in more detail how the instrument works in practice. Therefore, we used a mixed-methods design to extend the quantitative observer ratings, which enable high inference, by methods from qualitative content analysis. The results suggest the conclusion that the framework differentiates well between the lessons under a subject-specific perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 490
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Disentangling general achievement levels and subject-specific strengths and weaknesses in mathematics, reading, and science
    Gladushyna, Olesya
    Strietholt, Rolf
    Steinmann, Isa
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2021, 33 (01) : 203 - 227
  • [22] Disentangling general achievement levels and subject-specific strengths and weaknesses in mathematics, reading, and science
    Olesya Gladushyna
    Rolf Strietholt
    Isa Steinmann
    [J]. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 2021, 33 : 203 - 227
  • [23] Subject-Specific Instructional Leadership in K8 Schools: The Supervision of Science in an Era of Reform
    Lowenhaupt, Rebecca
    McNeill, Katherine L.
    [J]. LEADERSHIP AND POLICY IN SCHOOLS, 2019, 18 (03) : 460 - 484
  • [24] SUBJECT-SPECIFIC AND TASK-SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS OF METALINGUISTIC AWARENESS IN BILINGUAL-CHILDREN
    GALAMBOS, SJ
    HAKUTA, K
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 1988, 9 (02) : 141 - 162
  • [25] Towards subject-specific biomechanical analyses
    Gorce, Philippe
    Mitton, David
    [J]. IRBM, 2009, 30 (01) : 1 - 1
  • [26] Erratum to: The Role of General and Subject-specific Language Skills when Learning Mathematics in Elementary School
    Stefan Ufer
    Katrin Bochnik
    [J]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 2020, 41 : 119 - 124
  • [27] MODELING SUBJECT-SPECIFIC NONAUTONOMOUS DYNAMICS
    Zhou, Siyuan
    Paul, Debashis
    Peng, Jie
    [J]. STATISTICA SINICA, 2018, 28 (01) : 423 - 447
  • [28] Inclusion as a Subject-specific task area of Special education speech and Language therapy?
    Grohnfeldt, M.
    [J]. SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2011, 35 (03): : E133 - E135
  • [29] Reconstructing subject-specific effect maps
    Konukoglu, Ender
    Glocker, Ben
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 181 : 521 - 538
  • [30] Subject-specific modeling of intracranial aneurysms
    Cebral, JR
    Henandez, M
    Frangi, A
    Putman, C
    Pergolesi, R
    Burgess, J
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: PHYSIOLOGY, FUNCTION, AND STRUCTURE FROM MEDICAL IMAGES, 2004, 5 (23): : 319 - 327